This change fixes two bugs and adds a safeguard.
The first issue is that the schema Gemini expected differed from the one sent, resulting in 400 errors when performing completions.
The second issue was that creating a new persona won't define a method
for `response_format`. This has to be explicitly defined when we wrap it inside the Persona class. Also, There was a mismatch between the default value and what we stored in the DB. Some parts of the code expected symbols as keys and others as strings.
Finally, we add a safeguard when, even if asked to, the model refuses to reply with a valid JSON. In this case, we are making a best-effort to recover and stream the raw response.
This commit introduces a new Forum Researcher persona specialized in deep forum content analysis along with comprehensive improvements to our AI infrastructure.
Key additions:
New Forum Researcher persona with advanced filtering and analysis capabilities
Robust filtering system supporting tags, categories, dates, users, and keywords
LLM formatter to efficiently process and chunk research results
Infrastructure improvements:
Implemented CancelManager class to centrally manage AI completion cancellations
Replaced callback-based cancellation with a more robust pattern
Added systematic cancellation monitoring with callbacks
Other improvements:
Added configurable default_enabled flag to control which personas are enabled by default
Updated translation strings for the new researcher functionality
Added comprehensive specs for the new components
Renames Researcher -> Web Researcher
This change makes our AI platform more stable while adding powerful research capabilities that can analyze forum trends and surface relevant content.
* DEV: Use structured responses for summaries
* Fix system specs
* Make response_format a first class citizen and update endpoints to support it
* Response format can be specified in the persona
* lint
* switch to jsonb and make column nullable
* Reify structured output chunks. Move JSON parsing to the depths of Completion
* Switch to JsonStreamingTracker for partial JSON parsing
* REFACTOR: Move personas into it's own module.
* WIP: Use personas for summarization
* Prioritize persona default LLM or fallback to newest one
* Simplify summarization strategy
* Keep ai_sumarization_model as a fallback
Before this change, a summary was only outdated when new content appeared, for topics with "best replies", when the query returned different results. The intent behind this change is to detect when a summary is outdated as a result of an edit.
Additionally, we are changing the backfill candidates query to compare "ai_summary_backfill_topic_max_age_days" against "last_posted_at" instead of "created_at", to catch long-lived, active topics. This was discussed here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/ai-summarization-backfill-is-stuck-keeps-regenerating-the-same-topic/347088/14?u=roman_rizzi
To quickly select backfill candidates without comparing SHAs, we compare the last summarized post to the topic's highest_post_number. However, hiding or deleting a post and adding a small action will update this column, causing the job to stall and re-generate the same summary repeatedly until someone posts a regular reply. On top of this, this is not always true for topics with `best_replies`, as this last reply isn't necessarily included.
Since this is not evident at first glance and each summarization strategy picks its targets differently, I'm opting to simplify the backfill logic and how we track potential candidates.
The first step is dropping `content_range`, which serves no purpose and it's there because summary caching was supposed to work differently at the beginning. So instead, I'm replacing it with a column called `highest_target_number`, which tracks `highest_post_number` for topics and could track other things like channel's `message_count` in the future.
Now that we have this column when selecting every potential backfill candidate, we'll check if the summary is truly outdated by comparing the SHAs, and if it's not, we just update the column and move on
This PR fixes an issue where clicking to regenerate a summary was still showing the cached summary. To resolve this we call resetSummary() to reset all the summarization related properties before creating a new request.
This change introduces a job to summarize topics and cache the results automatically. We provide a setting to control how many topics we'll backfill per hour and what the topic's minimum word count is to qualify.
We'll prioritize topics without summary over outdated ones.
* FEATURE: Fast-track gist regeneration when a hot topic gets a new post
* DEV: Introduce an upsert-like summarize
* FIX: Only enqueue fast-track gist for hot hot hot topics
---------
Co-authored-by: Rafael Silva <xfalcox@gmail.com>
* FIX/REFACTOR: FoldContent revamp
We hit a snag with our hot topic gist strategy: the regex we used to split the content didn't work, so we cannot send the original post separately. This was important for letting the model focus on what's new in the topic.
The algorithm doesn’t give us full control over how prompts are written, and figuring out how to format the content isn't straightforward. This means we're having to use more complicated workarounds, like regex.
To tackle this, I'm suggesting we simplify the approach a bit. Let's focus on summarizing as much as we can upfront, then gradually add new content until there's nothing left to summarize.
Also, the "extend" part is mostly for models with small context windows, which shouldn't pose a problem 99% of the time with the content volume we're dealing with.
* Fix fold docs
* Use #shift instead of #pop to get the first elem, not the last
