## LLM Persona Triage
- Allows automated responses to posts using AI personas
- Configurable to respond as regular posts or whispers
- Adds context-aware formatting for topics and private messages
- Provides special handling for topic metadata (title, category, tags)
## LLM Tool Triage
- Enables custom AI tools to process and respond to posts
- Tools can analyze post content and invoke personas when needed
- Zero-parameter tools can be used for automated workflows
- Not enabled in production yet
## Implementation Details
- Added new scriptable registration in discourse_automation/ directory
- Created core implementation in lib/automation/ modules
- Enhanced PromptMessagesBuilder with topic-style formatting
- Added helper methods for persona and tool selection in UI
- Extended AI Bot functionality to support whisper responses
- Added rate limiting to prevent abuse
## Other Changes
- Added comprehensive test coverage for both automation types
- Enhanced tool runner with LLM integration capabilities
- Improved error handling and logging
This feature allows forum admins to configure AI personas to automatically respond to posts based on custom criteria and leverage AI tools for more complex triage workflows.
Tool Triage has been disabled in production while we finalize details of new scripting capabilities.
adds support for "thinking tokens" - a feature that exposes the model's reasoning process before providing the final response. Key improvements include:
- Add a new Thinking class to handle thinking content from LLMs
- Modify endpoints (Claude, AWS Bedrock) to handle thinking output
- Update AI bot to display thinking in collapsible details section
- Fix SEARCH/REPLACE blocks to support empty replacement strings and general improvements to artifact editing
- Allow configurable temperature in triage and report automations
- Various bug fixes and improvements to diff parsing
## 🔍 Overview
This update adds a new report page at `admin/reports/sentiment_analysis` where admins can see a sentiment analysis report for the forum grouped by either category or tags.
## ➕ More details
The report can breakdown either category or tags into positive/negative/neutral sentiments based on the grouping (category/tag). Clicking on the doughnut visualization will bring up a post list of all the posts that were involved in that classification with further sentiment classifications by post.
The report can additionally be sorted in alphabetical order or by size, as well as be filtered by either category/tag based on the grouping.
## 👨🏽💻 Technical Details
The new admin report is registered via the pluginAPi with `api.registerReportModeComponent` to register the custom sentiment doughnut report. However, when each doughnut visualization is clicked, a new endpoint found at: `/discourse-ai/sentiment/posts` is fetched to showcase posts classified by sentiments based on the respective params.
## 📸 Screenshots
* FEATURE: Tool name validation
- Add unique index to the name column of the ai_tools table
- correct our tests for AiToolController
- tool_name field which will be used to represent to LLM
- Add tool_name to Tools's presets
- Add duplicate tools validation for AiPersona
- Add unique constraint to the name column of the ai_tools table
* DEV: Validate duplicate tool_name between builin tools and custom tools
* lint
* chore: fix linting
* fix conlict mistakes
* chore: correct icon class
* chore: fix failed specs
* Add max_length to tool_name
* chore: correct the option name
* lintings
* fix lintings
### Why
This pull request fundamentally restructures how AI bots create and update web artifacts to address critical limitations in the previous approach:
1. **Improved Artifact Context for LLMs**: Previously, artifact creation and update tools included the *entire* artifact source code directly in the tool arguments. This overloaded the Language Model (LLM) with raw code, making it difficult for the LLM to maintain a clear understanding of the artifact's current state when applying changes. The LLM would struggle to differentiate between the base artifact and the requested modifications, leading to confusion and less effective updates.
2. **Reduced Token Usage and History Bloat**: Including the full artifact source code in every tool interaction was extremely token-inefficient. As conversations progressed, this redundant code in the history consumed a significant number of tokens unnecessarily. This not only increased costs but also diluted the context for the LLM with less relevant historical information.
3. **Enabling Updates for Large Artifacts**: The lack of a practical diff or targeted update mechanism made it nearly impossible to efficiently update larger web artifacts. Sending the entire source code for every minor change was both computationally expensive and prone to errors, effectively blocking the use of AI bots for meaningful modifications of complex artifacts.
**This pull request addresses these core issues by**:
* Introducing methods for the AI bot to explicitly *read* and understand the current state of an artifact.
* Implementing efficient update strategies that send *targeted* changes rather than the entire artifact source code.
* Providing options to control the level of artifact context included in LLM prompts, optimizing token usage.
### What
The main changes implemented in this PR to resolve the above issues are:
1. **`Read Artifact` Tool for Contextual Awareness**:
- A new `read_artifact` tool is introduced, enabling AI bots to fetch and process the current content of a web artifact from a given URL (local or external).
- This provides the LLM with a clear and up-to-date representation of the artifact's HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, improving its understanding of the base to be modified.
- By cloning local artifacts, it allows the bot to work with a fresh copy, further enhancing context and control.
2. **Refactored `Update Artifact` Tool with Efficient Strategies**:
- The `update_artifact` tool is redesigned to employ more efficient update strategies, minimizing token usage and improving update precision:
- **`diff` strategy**: Utilizes a search-and-replace diff algorithm to apply only the necessary, targeted changes to the artifact's code. This significantly reduces the amount of code sent to the LLM and focuses its attention on the specific modifications.
- **`full` strategy**: Provides the option to replace the entire content sections (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) when a complete rewrite is required.
- Tool options enhance the control over the update process:
- `editor_llm`: Allows selection of a specific LLM for artifact updates, potentially optimizing for code editing tasks.
- `update_algorithm`: Enables choosing between `diff` and `full` update strategies based on the nature of the required changes.
- `do_not_echo_artifact`: Defaults to true, and by *not* echoing the artifact in prompts, it further reduces token consumption in scenarios where the LLM might not need the full artifact context for every update step (though effectiveness might be slightly reduced in certain update scenarios).
3. **System and General Persona Tool Option Visibility and Customization**:
- Tool options, including those for system personas, are made visible and editable in the admin UI. This allows administrators to fine-tune the behavior of all personas and their tools, including setting specific LLMs or update algorithms. This was previously limited or hidden for system personas.
4. **Centralized and Improved Content Security Policy (CSP) Management**:
- The CSP for AI artifacts is consolidated and made more maintainable through the `ALLOWED_CDN_SOURCES` constant. This improves code organization and future updates to the allowed CDN list, while maintaining the existing security posture.
5. **Codebase Improvements**:
- Refactoring of diff utilities, introduction of strategy classes, enhanced error handling, new locales, and comprehensive testing all contribute to a more robust, efficient, and maintainable artifact management system.
By addressing the issues of LLM context confusion, token inefficiency, and the limitations of updating large artifacts, this pull request significantly improves the practicality and effectiveness of AI bots in managing web artifacts within Discourse.
Before this change, we let you set the embeddings selected model back to " " even with embeddings enabled. This will leave the site in a broken state.
Additionally, it adds a fail-safe for these scenarios to avoid errors on the topics page.
* Use AR model for embeddings features
* endpoints
* Embeddings CRUD UI
* Add presets. Hide a couple more settings
* system specs
* Seed embedding definition from old settings
* Generate search bit index on the fly. cleanup orphaned data
* support for seeded models
* Fix run test for new embedding
* fix selected model not set correctly
Adds a comprehensive quota management system for LLM models that allows:
- Setting per-group (applied per user in the group) token and usage limits with configurable durations
- Tracking and enforcing token/usage limits across user groups
- Quota reset periods (hourly, daily, weekly, or custom)
- Admin UI for managing quotas with real-time updates
This system provides granular control over LLM API usage by allowing admins
to define limits on both total tokens and number of requests per group.
Supports multiple concurrent quotas per model and automatically handles
quota resets.
Co-authored-by: Keegan George <kgeorge13@gmail.com>
This update adds some structure for handling errors in the spam config while also handling a specific error related to the spam scanning user not being an admin account.
* FEATURE: smart date support for AI helper
This feature allows conversion of human typed in dates and times
to smart "Discourse" timezone friendly dates.
* fix specs and lint
* lint
* address feedback
* add specs
This feature adds a periodic problem check which periodically checks for issues with LLMs that are in use. Periodically, we will run a test to see if the in use LLMs are still operational. If it is not, the LLM with the problem is surfaced to the admin so they can easily go and update the configuration.
This introduces a comprehensive spam detection system that uses LLM models
to automatically identify and flag potential spam posts. The system is
designed to be both powerful and configurable while preventing false positives.
Key Features:
* Automatically scans first 3 posts from new users (TL0/TL1)
* Creates dedicated AI flagging user to distinguish from system flags
* Tracks false positives/negatives for quality monitoring
* Supports custom instructions to fine-tune detection
* Includes test interface for trying detection on any post
Technical Implementation:
* New database tables:
- ai_spam_logs: Stores scan history and results
- ai_moderation_settings: Stores LLM config and custom instructions
* Rate limiting and safeguards:
- Minimum 10-minute delay between rescans
- Only scans significant edits (>10 char difference)
- Maximum 3 scans per post
- 24-hour maximum age for scannable posts
* Admin UI features:
- Real-time testing capabilities
- 7-day statistics dashboard
- Configurable LLM model selection
- Custom instruction support
Security and Performance:
* Respects trust levels - only scans TL0/TL1 users
* Skips private messages entirely
* Stops scanning users after 3 successful public posts
* Includes comprehensive test coverage
* Maintains audit log of all scan attempts
---------
Co-authored-by: Keegan George <kgeorge13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
Instead of a stacked chart showing a separate series for positive and negative, this PR introduces a simplification to the overall sentiment dashboard. It comprises the sentiment into a single series of the difference between `positive - negative` instead. This should allow for the data to be more easy to scan and look for trends
Instead of a stacked chart showing a separate series for positive and negative, this PR introduces a simplification to the overall sentiment dashboard. It comprises the sentiment into a single series of the difference between `positive - negative` instead. This should allow for the data to be more easy to scan and look for trends.
* FEATURE: first class support for OpenRouter
This new implementation supports picking quantization and provider pref
Also:
- Improve logging for summary generation
- Improve error message when contacting LLMs fails
* Better support for full screen artifacts on iPad
Support back button to close full screen
Add support for versioned artifacts with improved diff handling
* Add versioned artifacts support allowing artifacts to be updated and tracked
- New `ai_artifact_versions` table to store version history
- Support for updating artifacts through a new `UpdateArtifact` tool
- Add version-aware artifact rendering in posts
- Include change descriptions for version tracking
* Enhance artifact rendering and security
- Add support for module-type scripts and external JS dependencies
- Expand CSP to allow trusted CDN sources (unpkg, cdnjs, jsdelivr, googleapis)
- Improve JavaScript handling in artifacts
* Implement robust diff handling system (this is dormant but ready to use once LLMs catch up)
- Add new DiffUtils module for applying changes to artifacts
- Support for unified diff format with multiple hunks
- Intelligent handling of whitespace and line endings
- Comprehensive error handling for diff operations
* Update routes and UI components
- Add versioned artifact routes
- Update markdown processing for versioned artifacts
Also
- Tweaks summary prompt
- Improves upload support in custom tool to also provide urls
* FEATURE: allow mentioning an LLM mid conversation to switch
This is a edgecase feature that allow you to start a conversation
in a PM with LLM1 and then use LLM2 to evaluation or continue
the conversation
* FEATURE: allow auto silencing of spam accounts
New rule can also allow for silencing an account automatically
This can prevent spammers from creating additional posts.
* FEATURE: Make emotion /filter ordering match the dashboard table
This change makes the /filter endpoint use the same criteria we use
in the dashboard table for emotion, so it is not confusing for users.
It means that only posts made in the period with the emotion shall be
shown in the /filter, and the order is simply a count of posts that
match the emotion in the period.
It also uses a trick to extract the filter period, and apply it to
the CTE clause that calculates post emotion count on the period, making
it a bit more efficient. Downside is that /filter filters are evaluated
from left to right, so it will only get the speed-up if the emotion
order is last. As we do this on the dashboard table, it should cover
most uses of the ordering, kicking the need for materialized views
down the road.
* Remove zero score in filter
* add table tooltip
* lint
1. Keep source in a "details" block after rendered so it does
not overwhelm users
2. Ensure artifacts are never indexed by robots
3. Cache break our CSS that changed recently
This is a significant PR that introduces AI Artifacts functionality to the discourse-ai plugin along with several other improvements. Here are the key changes:
1. AI Artifacts System:
- Adds a new `AiArtifact` model and database migration
- Allows creation of web artifacts with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript content
- Introduces security settings (`strict`, `lax`, `disabled`) for controlling artifact execution
- Implements artifact rendering in iframes with sandbox protection
- New `CreateArtifact` tool for AI to generate interactive content
2. Tool System Improvements:
- Adds support for partial tool calls, allowing incremental updates during generation
- Better handling of tool call states and progress tracking
- Improved XML tool processing with CDATA support
- Fixes for tool parameter handling and duplicate invocations
3. LLM Provider Updates:
- Updates for Anthropic Claude models with correct token limits
- Adds support for native/XML tool modes in Gemini integration
- Adds new model configurations including Llama 3.1 models
- Improvements to streaming response handling
4. UI Enhancements:
- New artifact viewer component with expand/collapse functionality
- Security controls for artifact execution (click-to-run in strict mode)
- Improved dialog and response handling
- Better error management for tool execution
5. Security Improvements:
- Sandbox controls for artifact execution
- Public/private artifact sharing controls
- Security settings to control artifact behavior
- CSP and frame-options handling for artifacts
6. Technical Improvements:
- Better post streaming implementation
- Improved error handling in completions
- Better memory management for partial tool calls
- Enhanced testing coverage
7. Configuration:
- New site settings for artifact security
- Extended LLM model configurations
- Additional tool configuration options
This PR significantly enhances the plugin's capabilities for generating and displaying interactive content while maintaining security and providing flexible configuration options for administrators.
This change introduces a job to summarize topics and cache the results automatically. We provide a setting to control how many topics we'll backfill per hour and what the topic's minimum word count is to qualify.
We'll prioritize topics without summary over outdated ones.
The new `/admin/plugins/discourse-ai/ai-personas/stream-reply.json` was added.
This endpoint streams data direct from a persona and can be used
to access a persona from remote systems leaving a paper trail in
PMs about the conversation that happened
This endpoint is only accessible to admins.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Grubba <70247653+Grubba27@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Keegan George <kgeorge13@gmail.com>
* FIX: Llm selector / forced tools / search tool
This fixes a few issues:
1. When search was not finding any semantic results we would break the tool
2. Gemin / Anthropic models did not implement forced tools previously despite it being an API option
3. Mechanics around displaying llm selector were not right. If you disabled LLM selector server side persona PM did not work correctly.
4. Disabling native tools for anthropic model moved out of a site setting. This deliberately does not migrate cause this feature is really rare to need now, people who had it set probably did not need it.
5. Updates anthropic model names to latest release
* linting
* fix a couple of tests I missed
* clean up conditional
* Display gists in the hot topics list
* Adjust hot topics gist strategy and add a job to generate gists
* Replace setting with a configurable batch size
* Avoid loading summaries for other topic lists
* Tweak gist prompt to focus on latest posts in the context of the OP
* Remove serializer hack and rely on core change from discourse/discourse#29291
* Update lib/summarization/strategies/hot_topic_gists.rb
Co-authored-by: Rafael dos Santos Silva <xfalcox@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Rafael dos Santos Silva <xfalcox@gmail.com>
This adds chain halting (ability to terminate llm chain in a tool)
and the ability to create uploads in a tool
Together this lets us integrate custom image generators into a
custom tool.
Previous to this change we could flag, but there was no way
to hide content and treat the flag as spam.
We had the option to hide topics, but this is not desirable for
a spam reply.
New option allows triage to hide a post if it is a reply, if the
post happens to be the first post on the topic, the topic will
be hidden.
* FEATURE: LLM Triage support for systemless models.
This change adds support for OSS models without support for system messages. LlmTriage's system message field is no longer mandatory. We now send the post contents in a separate user message.
* Models using Ollama can also disable system prompts
New `ai_pm_summarization_allowed_groups` can be used to allow
visibility of the summarization feature on PMs.
This can be useful on forums where a lot of communication happens
inside PMs.
Creating a new model, either manually or from presets, doesn't initialize the `provider_params` object, meaning their custom params won't persist.
Additionally, this change adds some validations for Bedrock params, which are mandatory, and a clear message when a completion fails because we cannot build the URL.
