Before this change, a summary was only outdated when new content appeared, for topics with "best replies", when the query returned different results. The intent behind this change is to detect when a summary is outdated as a result of an edit.
Additionally, we are changing the backfill candidates query to compare "ai_summary_backfill_topic_max_age_days" against "last_posted_at" instead of "created_at", to catch long-lived, active topics. This was discussed here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/ai-summarization-backfill-is-stuck-keeps-regenerating-the-same-topic/347088/14?u=roman_rizzi
To quickly select backfill candidates without comparing SHAs, we compare the last summarized post to the topic's highest_post_number. However, hiding or deleting a post and adding a small action will update this column, causing the job to stall and re-generate the same summary repeatedly until someone posts a regular reply. On top of this, this is not always true for topics with `best_replies`, as this last reply isn't necessarily included.
Since this is not evident at first glance and each summarization strategy picks its targets differently, I'm opting to simplify the backfill logic and how we track potential candidates.
The first step is dropping `content_range`, which serves no purpose and it's there because summary caching was supposed to work differently at the beginning. So instead, I'm replacing it with a column called `highest_target_number`, which tracks `highest_post_number` for topics and could track other things like channel's `message_count` in the future.
Now that we have this column when selecting every potential backfill candidate, we'll check if the summary is truly outdated by comparing the SHAs, and if it's not, we just update the column and move on
This PR fixes an issue where clicking to regenerate a summary was still showing the cached summary. To resolve this we call resetSummary() to reset all the summarization related properties before creating a new request.
This change introduces a job to summarize topics and cache the results automatically. We provide a setting to control how many topics we'll backfill per hour and what the topic's minimum word count is to qualify.
We'll prioritize topics without summary over outdated ones.
* FEATURE: Fast-track gist regeneration when a hot topic gets a new post
* DEV: Introduce an upsert-like summarize
* FIX: Only enqueue fast-track gist for hot hot hot topics
---------
Co-authored-by: Rafael Silva <xfalcox@gmail.com>
* FIX/REFACTOR: FoldContent revamp
We hit a snag with our hot topic gist strategy: the regex we used to split the content didn't work, so we cannot send the original post separately. This was important for letting the model focus on what's new in the topic.
The algorithm doesn’t give us full control over how prompts are written, and figuring out how to format the content isn't straightforward. This means we're having to use more complicated workarounds, like regex.
To tackle this, I'm suggesting we simplify the approach a bit. Let's focus on summarizing as much as we can upfront, then gradually add new content until there's nothing left to summarize.
Also, the "extend" part is mostly for models with small context windows, which shouldn't pose a problem 99% of the time with the content volume we're dealing with.
* Fix fold docs
* Use #shift instead of #pop to get the first elem, not the last
