Bulk archiving group messages can be done from two places: a) from the user's view (/u/ted/messages/group/swedes) and b) from the group's view (/g/swedes/messages/inbox). Only the former is currently working. From the latter view, the action looks like a success, but is actually a no-op.
There are flaky system tests that have been exhausting the 10 seconds
default max wait time which we have set previously on CI. However, I
have yet to be able to figure out why and lack the tools to be able to
figure out why. The hope here is that the upcoming playwright driver
will provide us with better tooling to debug such problems.
I've attempted to use `Capybara::Session#using_wait_time` by there is
some race condition going on where the session's default max wait time
is sometimes not set properly. I can't figure out why and have spent too
much time trying to figure out why. Instead, I will just bump up the
`default_max_wait_time` to `20`. This may the build take longer when
there are test failures but it is a trade-off we will make right now.
We now have 3 search UX variations:
* Header search
* Welcome banner search
* Icon search
And within each of these there is a `<SearchMenu />`
component with an input that needs to be focused based
on either Ctrl+F or `/` shortcuts. This commit makes
sure that each has a unique ID, and moves the functionality
of determining the "current" input ID and focusing the
input to the search service.
This fixes issues like where pressing Ctrl+F twice on
the header search would not reveal the regular browser
search.
This builds onto #32013 in two major ways:
- Unsaved changes are now persisted when you browse categories inside "All site settings".
- If you're about to navigate away (and lose edits) you will be prompted if you want to save or discard changes. (This applies to individual category site setting pages as well.
When `Capybara.threadsafe` has been set to `true` as in our case, we
have to use `Capybara::Session#using_wait_time` instead of
`Capybara.using_wait_time`. The latter sets `default_max_wait_time` on
`Capybara.default_max_wait_time` while the former sets
`default_max_wait_time` on the session.
This is a follow up to 59edec46a3de105e720bd2c716ae34d636794044
Test is flaky and seems to require more time to complete on CI so we
double the max wait time for now to see if it reduces the test's
flakiness.
iOS is automatically converting a double-hyphen (--) to an em-dash (–).
It may get in the way when we're trying to create an horizontal rule
with a ---, so this PR adds the "em-dash + hyphen" case to our input
rule regex.
This commit allows the ProseMirror rich editor to display chat
transcripts copied from chat using the "Copy" button.
The BBCode usually looks something like this:
```
[chat quote="hunter;29856;2025-03-20T07:13:04Z" channel="design gems 🎉" channelId="95"]
haha **ok** _cool_
[/chat]
```
But there are several variations that must be accounted for:
* Single message from single user
* Multiple messages from a single and multiple users
* Messages inside chat threads
The rich transcript extension has to ignore many of the chat transcript
markdown
tokens because they simply aren't necessary -- none of the ProseMirror
nodes need
to be editable. So, we basically recreate the same HTML that the chat
transcript markdown
rule does in the `toDOM()` function. Maybe in future we want to make the
markdown rule
do less and have this HTML creation in one place, but for now we need to
mirror in both files.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renato Atilio <renato@discourse.org>
When a site has the `must_approve_users` setting enabled, new user data is stored on the Reviewable model, including username, email, and any other data that is entered during signup. If the user is rejected, that data is retained, without a clear path to deleting it.
In order to allow data that could be PII to be removed, without breaking Discourse's audit and logging trails, this change scrubs the PII from the relevant `ReviewableUser` and `UserHistory` objects, replacing that data with who scrubbed it, and why.
The rules are:
- between 1 and 3 emojis: bigger emoji
- more than 3 or any text or node in the same paragraph: regular emoji
This is implemented through a prose mirror plugin, which try to be smart
and recompute only edited paragraphs. Full scan on first load.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renato Atilio <renato@discourse.org>
The `using_wait_time` DSL did not work when used in the `around` context
as the Capybara's session has not been initialized.
Follow-up to afde7cc1727a751e4d87be2ceee17f2d82edf89c
I'm not sure what is causing the tests to be flaky so I need more
information to determine where the problem is. For now, I'm doubling the
wait time to rule out any server side problem.
A system test in `system/search_spec.rb` was failing with the following
error frequently on CI:
```
Failure/Error: expect(search_page).to have_heading_text("Search")
expected `#<PageObjects::Pages::Search:0x00007fb9fcd3f028>.has_heading_text?("Search")` to be truthy, got false
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_search_when_using_full_page_search_on_mobile_works_and_clears_search_page_state_912.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
(no logs)
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./spec/system/search_spec.rb:42:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/benchmark-0.4.0/lib/benchmark.rb:304:in `measure'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:580:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:185:in `block in timeout'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:192:in `timeout'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:570:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:527:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.25.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
The failure screenshot shows that the "user" is on the homepage even
though we have already clicked the search icon and ensured that the user
can see the search container. I suspect there is some sort of race
condition here since Capybara executes clicks in quick sucession where
we clicked on both the homepage logo and the search icon. It may be
possible that Ember redirected the user to the search page first
before the browser was able to finish navigating the user to the `/`
href.
### Reviewer notes
Test flaked in
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/14085443789/job/39448197089
with the following failure screenshot:
This is to provide diagnostic information for some flaky system tests
which we are currently investigating. The previous attempt in
6f92f42eb83fea61b2712aaaefcc124e4939365d only dumped threads that
contains the `puma` gem in the backtrace but that is not enough. Since I
am now printing all thread backtraces, I added the
`dump_threads_on_failure` metadata
which will be used to determine if all the thread backtraces should be
printed out in the spec's failure output.
This commit improves said method to ensure that user is redirected to
the right page before returning.
### Reviewer notes
Example of test flakiness:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/14081653020/job/39435797236
```
Failure/Error: raise capybara_timeout_error
CapybaraTimeoutExtension::CapybaraTimedOut:
This spec passed, but capybara waited for the full wait duration (10s) at least once. This will slow down the test suite. Beware of negating the result of selenium's RSpec matchers.
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_user_resetting_password_when_desktop_when_user_has_multi_factor_authentication_configured_when_user_has_security_key_and_backup_codes_configured_should_allow_a_user_to_reset_pass_261.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
Shared Example Group: "forgot password scenarios" called from ./spec/system/forgot_password_spec.rb:213
./spec/rails_helper.rb:426:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/benchmark-0.4.0/lib/benchmark.rb:304:in `measure'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:580:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:185:in `block in timeout'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:192:in `timeout'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:570:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:527:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.25.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
This commit adds a loading state to the confirm button in
`confirm-session` dialog.
This also unskips the flaky system tests in
`spec/system/forgot_password_spec.rb` as this change will allow us to
gather more information about why the test is flaky. The screenshots
which we have gathered when the test flakes does not allow us to know if
the button has been clicked or not before the test times out.
This switches the signup/login UI to the full page experience by
default. This has been in use by many sites for multiple months and we
have ironed out many fixes in the meantime.
The `full_page_login` setting is also marked for removal in about
1.5mths, by the end of April 2025.
This commit unskips 3 flaky system tests and gives up on asserting that
redirecting is done correctly. This is because we have invested
considerable effort into this and cannot figure it out. The redirect is
tested by the client side anyway so there is still some test coverage.
Tight lists are lists that look like this:
* Item 1
* Item 2
* Item 3
Loose lists look like this:
* Item 1
* Item 2
* Item 3
There is a place for the latter, but the former is more
common default behaviour for writing apps and widgets, so
we are overriding the prosemirror default to use tight lists.
Eventually we will have a shortcut or other special behaviour
to switch between the list styles.
When editing a color palette via the new page introduced in
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/31742, it should apply the
color changes for the admin making the change automatically upon save.
Internal topic: t/148628/12.
The tests being fixed in this commit are not waiting for the
asynchronous behaviour of bulk closing topic to complete before running
some of the assertions. This commit updates the tests to check for the
asynchronous behaviour to complete so that the following assertions will
pass with more reliability.
This commit removes an assertion for the redirect after 2FA
authentication is success message because the message is flashed briefly
before a route transition happens. A proper fix would require us to
redesign when/how the flash message which we can address in the future.
Meta:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/cant-erase-the-bookmark-search-input/357861/4
> When we fill in the bookmark search input and send the request, then
we can’t delete the input’s content.
After removing the last character, the `searchTerm` getter is called. At
this point, `_searchTerm` is empty.
However, `this._searchTerm || this.q` will treat the empty string as
_falsy_, and the `q` value is displayed instead.
It makes it impossible to clear the input.
To fix this, we check specifically on the initial state of
`_searchTerm,` which is _undefined_, to include an empty string as a
valid value.
Note: because of `@computed`, the issue is not triggered when the
content is selected and deleted.
This commit updates the 2FA token submission page to disable the submit
button when the 2FA token is not valid and to also set the submit button
to be in the loading state after the submit button has been clicked.
The UX issues were discovered while I was investigating a flaky test
which has been unskipped in this commit as well. I am not sure if this
will completely resolve the flakiness but we have to unskip it to know
if it continues to be flaky.
Now we have the search input showing in a few
different configurations:
* Welcome banner
* Header field
* Header icon
And we can get to the search with both `/` and
`Ctrl+F` shortcuts. These configurations can
be used together, and we need to focus on the right
search input at the right time.
This commit fixes the shortcuts not working
or showing the wrong thing in some cases,
and adds a comprehensive system spec for all
the variants.
Fixes an incorrect logic on `transformPasted` that was causing a
`TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'marks')` when only
part of a paragraph was selected.
Adds tests
Follow-up to https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/30953
This PR is a partial revert of the linked PR — it changes the "Themes
and components" link in the admin sidebar back to the legacy
`/admin/customize/themes` page and adds the themes list/sidebar back to
the left hand side of the page. The new `/admin/config/customize/` route
is still available, but it's not linked from anywhere. When accessing
the new page and then navigating to a theme, the old components (e.g.
the themes list) of the page are hidden. This allows us to iterate on
the new page and improve until we're more ready to make it available
more widely.
Both tests being unskipped here failed previosly with the following
error:
```
Failure/Error: expect(page).to have_current_path("/u/#{user.username}/preferences/account")
expected "/u/confirm-new-email/f42a416fcbca40d66788d65a8837ad49" to equal "/u/bruce306/preferences/account"
./spec/system/email_change_spec.rb:49:in `block (2 levels) in <main>'
```
The error indicates that the transition was not successful and I
suspect that it may be due to the use of the `/my` route prefix which
is just a nice to have and not necessary.
The change made in #31854 introduced a regression when editing groups, preventing saving when no auto membership e-mail domains are entered.
This change fixes that and adds a system test.
Before this commit,
`PageObjects::Components::SelectKit#expanded_component` might not expand
the component if `is_collapsed?` returns true which can return true if
the method was called before the select-kit component appears on the
screen. When that happens, we end up not expanding the `select-kit`
because we think it is collapsed when in fact the select-kit component
is not rendered yet. This lead to system test failures with errors like:
```
Capybara::ElementNotFound:
Unable to find css "#add-synonyms.is-expanded"
```
This commit updates `PageObjects::Components::SelectKit#is_collapsed?`
to check that the select-kit component has rendered first before
checking if the component is not expanded.
### Reviewer notes
Instances of test flakiness due to this bug:
1.
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/13905226478/job/38906569777
2.
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/13848357836/job/38751122333
When performing an action in the review queue, this change makes two improvements:
- The buttons on the reviewable item are disabled, so you can't accidentally multi-click.
- A toast is displayed when the action is complete, as a success indication.
Test is flaking in CI with:
```
Failure/Error: expect(theme_translations_settings_editor.get_input_value).to have_content("Bonjour!")
expected to find text "Bonjour!" in "Hello there!"
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_admin_customize_themes_when_editing_theme_translations_should_allow_admin_to_edit_and_save_the_theme_translations_from_other_languages_797.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
(no logs)
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./spec/system/admin_customize_themes_spec.rb:158:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
```
This is a stripped-back version of the Search Banner
component https://meta.discourse.org/t/search-banner/122939,
which will be renamed to Advanced Search Banner,
see https://github.com/discourse/discourse-search-banner/pull/84.
This welcome banner interacts with the header search.
When `search_experience` is set to `search_field`, we only
show the header search after the welcome banner scrolls
out of view, and vice-versa.
Only new sites will get this feature turned on by default,
existing sites have a migration to disable it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Vidrine <jordan@jordanvidrine.com>
