OpenSearch/docs/reference/indices/flush.asciidoc

249 lines
9.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[[indices-flush]]
== Flush
The flush API allows to flush one or more indices through an API. The
flush process of an index makes sure that any data that is currently only
persisted in the <<index-modules-translog,transaction log>> is also permanently
persisted in Lucene. This reduces recovery times as that data doesn't need to be
reindexed from the transaction logs after the Lucene indexed is opened. By
default, Elasticsearch uses heuristics in order to automatically
trigger flushes as required. It is rare for users to need to call the API directly.
[source,js]
--------------------------------------------------
POST twitter/_flush
--------------------------------------------------
// CONSOLE
// TEST[setup:twitter]
[float]
[[flush-parameters]]
=== Request Parameters
The flush API accepts the following request parameters:
[horizontal]
`wait_if_ongoing`:: If set to `true` the flush operation will block until the
flush can be executed if another flush operation is already executing.
The default is `false` and will cause an exception to be thrown on
the shard level if another flush operation is already running.
`force`:: Whether a flush should be forced even if it is not necessarily needed i.e.
if no changes will be committed to the index. This is useful if transaction log IDs
should be incremented even if no uncommitted changes are present.
(This setting can be considered as internal)
[float]
[[flush-multi-index]]
=== Multi Index
The flush API can be applied to more than one index with a single call,
or even on `_all` the indices.
[source,js]
--------------------------------------------------
POST kimchy,elasticsearch/_flush
POST _flush
--------------------------------------------------
// CONSOLE
// TEST[s/^/PUT kimchy\nPUT elasticsearch\n/]
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
[[indices-synced-flush]]
=== Synced Flush
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
Elasticsearch tracks the indexing activity of each shard. Shards that have not
received any indexing operations for 5 minutes are automatically marked as inactive. This presents
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
an opportunity for Elasticsearch to reduce shard resources and also perform
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
a special kind of flush, called `synced flush`. A synced flush performs a normal flush, then adds
a generated unique marker (sync_id) to all shards.
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
Since the sync id marker was added when there were no ongoing indexing operations, it can
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
be used as a quick way to check if the two shards' lucene indices are identical. This quick sync id
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
comparison (if present) is used during recovery or restarts to skip the first and
most costly phase of the process. In that case, no segment files need to be copied and
the transaction log replay phase of the recovery can start immediately. Note that since the sync id
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
marker was applied together with a flush, it is very likely that the transaction log will be empty,
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
speeding up recoveries even more.
This is particularly useful for use cases having lots of indices which are
never or very rarely updated, such as time based data. This use case typically generates lots of indices whose
recovery without the synced flush marker would take a long time.
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
To check whether a shard has a marker or not, look for the `commit` section of shard stats returned by
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
the <<indices-stats,indices stats>> API:
[source,sh]
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
--------------------------------------------------
GET twitter/_stats?filter_path=**.commit&level=shards <1>
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
--------------------------------------------------
// CONSOLE
// TEST[s/^/PUT twitter\nPOST twitter\/_flush\/synced\n/]
<1> `filter_path` is used to reduce the verbosity of the response, but is entirely optional
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
which returns something similar to:
[source,js]
--------------------------------------------------
{
"indices": {
"twitter": {
"shards": {
"0": [
{
"commit" : {
"id" : "3M3zkw2GHMo2Y4h4/KFKCg==",
"generation" : 3,
"user_data" : {
"translog_uuid" : "hnOG3xFcTDeoI_kvvvOdNA",
Introduce a History UUID as a requirement for ops based recovery (#26577) The new ops based recovery, introduce as part of #10708, is based on the assumption that all operations below the global checkpoint known to the replica do not need to be synced with the primary. This is based on the guarantee that all ops below it are available on primary and they are equal. Under normal operations this guarantee holds. Sadly, it can be violated when a primary is restored from an old snapshot. At the point the restore primary can miss operations below the replica's global checkpoint, or even worse may have total different operations at the same spot. This PR introduces the notion of a history uuid to be able to capture the difference with the restored primary (in a follow up PR). The History UUID is generated by a primary when it is first created and is synced to the replicas which are recovered via a file based recovery. The PR adds a requirement to ops based recovery to make sure that the history uuid of the source and the target are equal. Under normal operations, all shard copies will stay with that history uuid for the rest of the index lifetime and thus this is a noop. However, it gives us a place to guarantee we fall back to file base syncing in special events like a restore from snapshot (to be done as a follow up) and when someone calls the truncate translog command which can go wrong when combined with primary recovery (this is done in this PR). We considered in the past to use the translog uuid for this function (i.e., sync it across copies) and thus avoid adding an extra identifier. This idea was rejected as it removes the ability to verify that a specific translog really belongs to a specific lucene index. We also feel that having a history uuid will serve us well in the future.
2017-09-14 14:25:02 -04:00
"history_uuid" : "XP7KDJGiS1a2fHYiFL5TXQ",
"local_checkpoint" : "-1",
"translog_generation" : "2",
"max_seq_no" : "-1",
"sync_id" : "AVvFY-071siAOuFGEO9P", <1>
"max_unsafe_auto_id_timestamp" : "-1",
"min_retained_seq_no" : "0",
"retention_leases" : "id:replica-0;retaining_seq_no:0;timestamp:1547235588;source:replica"
},
"num_docs" : 0
}
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
}
]
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"id" : "3M3zkw2GHMo2Y4h4\/KFKCg=="/"id": $body.indices.twitter.shards.0.0.commit.id/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"translog_uuid" : "hnOG3xFcTDeoI_kvvvOdNA"/"translog_uuid": $body.indices.twitter.shards.0.0.commit.user_data.translog_uuid/]
Introduce a History UUID as a requirement for ops based recovery (#26577) The new ops based recovery, introduce as part of #10708, is based on the assumption that all operations below the global checkpoint known to the replica do not need to be synced with the primary. This is based on the guarantee that all ops below it are available on primary and they are equal. Under normal operations this guarantee holds. Sadly, it can be violated when a primary is restored from an old snapshot. At the point the restore primary can miss operations below the replica's global checkpoint, or even worse may have total different operations at the same spot. This PR introduces the notion of a history uuid to be able to capture the difference with the restored primary (in a follow up PR). The History UUID is generated by a primary when it is first created and is synced to the replicas which are recovered via a file based recovery. The PR adds a requirement to ops based recovery to make sure that the history uuid of the source and the target are equal. Under normal operations, all shard copies will stay with that history uuid for the rest of the index lifetime and thus this is a noop. However, it gives us a place to guarantee we fall back to file base syncing in special events like a restore from snapshot (to be done as a follow up) and when someone calls the truncate translog command which can go wrong when combined with primary recovery (this is done in this PR). We considered in the past to use the translog uuid for this function (i.e., sync it across copies) and thus avoid adding an extra identifier. This idea was rejected as it removes the ability to verify that a specific translog really belongs to a specific lucene index. We also feel that having a history uuid will serve us well in the future.
2017-09-14 14:25:02 -04:00
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"history_uuid" : "XP7KDJGiS1a2fHYiFL5TXQ"/"history_uuid": $body.indices.twitter.shards.0.0.commit.user_data.history_uuid/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"sync_id" : "AVvFY-071siAOuFGEO9P"/"sync_id": $body.indices.twitter.shards.0.0.commit.user_data.sync_id/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"retention_leases" : "id:replica-0;retaining_seq_no:0;timestamp:1547235588;source:replica"/"retention_leases": $body.indices.twitter.shards.0.0.commit.user_data.retention_leases/]
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
<1> the `sync id` marker
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
[float]
=== Synced Flush API
2015-05-27 03:29:37 -04:00
The Synced Flush API allows an administrator to initiate a synced flush manually. This can be particularly useful for
a planned (rolling) cluster restart where you can stop indexing and don't want to wait the default 5 minutes for
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
idle indices to be sync-flushed automatically.
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
While handy, there are a couple of caveats for this API:
1. Synced flush is a best effort operation. Any ongoing indexing operations will cause
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
the synced flush to fail on that shard. This means that some shards may be synced flushed while others aren't. See below for more.
2015-05-27 03:29:37 -04:00
2. The `sync_id` marker is removed as soon as the shard is flushed again. That is because a flush replaces the low level
lucene commit point where the marker is stored. Uncommitted operations in the transaction log do not remove the marker.
In practice, one should consider any indexing operation on an index as removing the marker as a flush can be triggered by Elasticsearch
at any time.
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
NOTE: It is harmless to request a synced flush while there is ongoing indexing. Shards that are idle will succeed and shards
that are not will fail. Any shards that succeeded will have faster recovery times.
[source,sh]
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
--------------------------------------------------
POST twitter/_flush/synced
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
--------------------------------------------------
// CONSOLE
// TEST[setup:twitter]
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
2015-05-27 03:29:37 -04:00
The response contains details about how many shards were successfully sync-flushed and information about any failure.
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
Here is what it looks like when all shards of a two shards and one replica index successfully
sync-flushed:
[source,js]
--------------------------------------------------
{
"_shards": {
"total": 2,
"successful": 2,
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
"failed": 0
},
"twitter": {
"total": 2,
"successful": 2,
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
"failed": 0
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"successful": 2/"successful": 1/]
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
Here is what it looks like when one shard group failed due to pending operations:
[source,js]
--------------------------------------------------
{
"_shards": {
"total": 4,
"successful": 2,
"failed": 2
},
"twitter": {
"total": 4,
"successful": 2,
"failed": 2,
"failures": [
{
"shard": 1,
"reason": "[2] ongoing operations on primary"
}
]
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// NOTCONSOLE
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
2016-02-09 05:07:32 -05:00
NOTE: The above error is shown when the synced flush fails due to concurrent indexing operations. The HTTP
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
status code in that case will be `409 CONFLICT`.
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
2015-05-27 03:29:37 -04:00
Sometimes the failures are specific to a shard copy. The copies that failed will not be eligible for
fast recovery but those that succeeded still will be. This case is reported as follows:
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
[source,js]
--------------------------------------------------
{
"_shards": {
"total": 4,
"successful": 1,
"failed": 1
},
"twitter": {
"total": 4,
"successful": 3,
"failed": 1,
"failures": [
{
"shard": 1,
"reason": "unexpected error",
"routing": {
"state": "STARTED",
"primary": false,
"node": "SZNr2J_ORxKTLUCydGX4zA",
"relocating_node": null,
"shard": 1,
"index": "twitter"
}
}
]
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// NOTCONSOLE
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
2015-05-27 08:40:02 -04:00
NOTE: When a shard copy fails to sync-flush, the HTTP status code returned will be `409 CONFLICT`.
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
The synced flush API can be applied to more than one index with a single call,
or even on `_all` the indices.
[source,js]
--------------------------------------------------
POST kimchy,elasticsearch/_flush/synced
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
POST _flush/synced
2015-05-23 10:18:21 -04:00
--------------------------------------------------
// CONSOLE