2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
[[indices-upgrade]]
|
|
|
|
== Upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-05 11:50:10 -04:00
|
|
|
The upgrade API allows to upgrade one or more indices to the latest Lucene
|
|
|
|
format through an API. The upgrade process converts any segments written with
|
|
|
|
older formats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.When to use the `upgrade` API
|
|
|
|
**************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newer versions of Lucene often come with a new index format which provides bug
|
|
|
|
fixes and performance improvements. In order to take advantage of these
|
|
|
|
improvements, the segments in each shard need to be rewritten using the latest
|
|
|
|
Lucene format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.Automatic upgrading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indices that are actively being written to will automatically write new
|
|
|
|
segments in the latest format. The background merge process which combines
|
|
|
|
multiple small segments into a single bigger segment will also write the new
|
|
|
|
merged segment in the latest format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.Optional manual upgrades
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some old segments may never be merged away because they are already too big to
|
|
|
|
be worth merging, and indices that no longer receive changes will not be
|
|
|
|
upgraded automatically. Upgrading segments is not required for most
|
|
|
|
Elasticsearch upgrades because it can read older formats from the current and
|
|
|
|
previous major version of Lucene.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can, however, choose to upgrade old segments manually to take advantage of
|
|
|
|
the latest format. The `upgrade` API will rewrite any old segments in the
|
|
|
|
latest Lucene format. It can be run on one index, multiple or all indices, so
|
|
|
|
you can control when it is run and how many indices it should upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.When you must use the `upgrade` API
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elasticsearch can only read formats from the current and previous major
|
|
|
|
version of Lucene. For instance, Elasticsearch 2.x (Lucene 5) can read disk
|
|
|
|
formats from Elasticsearch 0.90 and 1.x (Lucene 4), but not from Elasticsearch
|
|
|
|
0.20 and before (Lucene 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fact, an Elasticsearch 2.0 cluster will refuse to start if any indices
|
|
|
|
created before Elasticsearch 0.90 are present, and it will refuse to open them
|
|
|
|
if they are imported as dangling indices later on. It will not be possible to
|
|
|
|
restore an index created with Elasticsearch 0.20.x and before into a 2.0
|
|
|
|
cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These ancient indices must either be deleted or upgraded before migrating to
|
|
|
|
Elasticsearch 2.0. Upgrading will:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Rewrite old segments in the latest Lucene format.
|
|
|
|
* Add the `index.version.minimum_compatible` setting to the index, to mark it as
|
|
|
|
2.0 compatible coming[1.6.0].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of upgrading all segments that weren't written with the most recent
|
|
|
|
version of Lucene, you can choose to do the minimum work required before
|
|
|
|
moving to Elasticsearch 2.0, by specifying the `only_ancient_segments` option,
|
|
|
|
which will only rewrite segments written by Lucene 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**************************************************
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-10-11 10:22:24 -04:00
|
|
|
[float]
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
=== Start an upgrade
|
2014-10-11 10:22:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,sh]
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
$ curl -XPOST 'http://localhost:9200/twitter/_upgrade'
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-11 10:22:24 -04:00
|
|
|
NOTE: Upgrading is an I/O intensive operation, and is limited to processing a
|
|
|
|
single shard per node at a time. It also is not allowed to run at the same
|
|
|
|
time as optimize.
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-10 17:52:19 -05:00
|
|
|
This call will block until the upgrade is complete. If the http connection
|
|
|
|
is lost, the request will continue in the background, and
|
|
|
|
any new requests will block until the previous upgrade is complete.
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 04:54:00 -04:00
|
|
|
[float]
|
|
|
|
[[upgrade-parameters]]
|
|
|
|
==== Request Parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `upgrade` API accepts the following request parameters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[horizontal]
|
|
|
|
`only_ancient_segments`:: If true, only very old segments (from a
|
|
|
|
previous Lucene major release) will be upgraded. While this will do
|
|
|
|
the minimal work to ensure the next major release of Elasticsearch can
|
|
|
|
read the segments, it's dangerous because it can leave other very old
|
|
|
|
segments in sub-optimal formats. Defaults to `false`.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-11 10:22:24 -04:00
|
|
|
[float]
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
=== Check upgrade status
|
2014-10-11 10:22:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
Use a `GET` request to monitor how much of an index is upgraded. This
|
2015-04-16 04:54:00 -04:00
|
|
|
can also be used prior to starting an upgrade to identify which
|
|
|
|
indices you want to upgrade at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `ancient` byte values that are returned indicate total bytes of
|
|
|
|
segments whose version is extremely old (Lucene major version is
|
|
|
|
different from the current version), showing how much upgrading is
|
|
|
|
necessary when you run with `only_ancient_segments=true`.
|
2014-10-11 10:22:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,sh]
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
2015-01-16 07:55:22 -05:00
|
|
|
curl 'http://localhost:9200/twitter/_upgrade?pretty&human'
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,js]
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-05-24 18:22:06 -04:00
|
|
|
"size": "21gb",
|
|
|
|
"size_in_bytes": "21000000000",
|
|
|
|
"size_to_upgrade": "10gb",
|
|
|
|
"size_to_upgrade_in_bytes": "10000000000"
|
|
|
|
"size_to_upgrade_ancient": "1gb",
|
|
|
|
"size_to_upgrade_ancient_in_bytes": "1000000000"
|
|
|
|
"indices": {
|
|
|
|
"twitter": {
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
"size": "21gb",
|
|
|
|
"size_in_bytes": "21000000000",
|
|
|
|
"size_to_upgrade": "10gb",
|
|
|
|
"size_to_upgrade_in_bytes": "10000000000"
|
2015-04-16 04:54:00 -04:00
|
|
|
"size_to_upgrade_ancient": "1gb",
|
|
|
|
"size_to_upgrade_ancient_in_bytes": "1000000000"
|
2015-05-24 18:22:06 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-10-07 11:09:50 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
2015-05-24 18:22:06 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The level of details in the upgrade status command can be controlled by
|
|
|
|
setting `level` parameter to `cluster`, `index` (default) or `shard` levels.
|
|
|
|
For example, you can run the upgrade status command with `level=shard` to
|
|
|
|
get detailed upgrade information of each individual shard.
|