OpenSearch/docs/reference/aggregations/bucket/histogram-aggregation.asciidoc

379 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[[search-aggregations-bucket-histogram-aggregation]]
=== Histogram Aggregation
A multi-bucket values source based aggregation that can be applied on numeric values or numeric range values extracted
from the documents. It dynamically builds fixed size (a.k.a. interval) buckets over the values. For example, if the
documents have a field that holds a price (numeric), we can configure this aggregation to dynamically build buckets with
interval `5` (in case of price it may represent $5). When the aggregation executes, the price field of every document
will be evaluated and will be rounded down to its closest bucket - for example, if the price is `32` and the bucket size
is `5` then the rounding will yield `30` and thus the document will "fall" into the bucket that is associated with the
key `30`.
To make this more formal, here is the rounding function that is used:
[source,java]
--------------------------------------------------
bucket_key = Math.floor((value - offset) / interval) * interval + offset
--------------------------------------------------
For range values, a document can fall into multiple buckets. The first bucket is computed from the lower
bound of the range in the same way as a bucket for a single value is computed. The final bucket is computed in the same
way from the upper bound of the range, and the range is counted in all buckets in between and including those two.
The `interval` must be a positive decimal, while the `offset` must be a decimal in `[0, interval)`
(a decimal greater than or equal to `0` and less than `interval`)
The following snippet "buckets" the products based on their `price` by interval of `50`:
[source,console]
--------------------------------------------------
POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
"aggs" : {
"prices" : {
"histogram" : {
"field" : "price",
"interval" : 50
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TEST[setup:sales]
And the following may be the response:
[source,console-result]
--------------------------------------------------
{
...
"aggregations": {
"prices" : {
"buckets": [
{
"key": 0.0,
"doc_count": 1
},
{
"key": 50.0,
"doc_count": 1
},
{
"key": 100.0,
"doc_count": 0
},
{
"key": 150.0,
"doc_count": 2
},
{
"key": 200.0,
"doc_count": 3
}
]
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TESTRESPONSE[s/\.\.\./"took": $body.took,"timed_out": false,"_shards": $body._shards,"hits": $body.hits,/]
==== Minimum document count
The response above show that no documents has a price that falls within the range of `[100, 150)`. By default the
response will fill gaps in the histogram with empty buckets. It is possible change that and request buckets with
a higher minimum count thanks to the `min_doc_count` setting:
[source,console]
--------------------------------------------------
POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
"aggs" : {
"prices" : {
"histogram" : {
"field" : "price",
"interval" : 50,
"min_doc_count" : 1
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TEST[setup:sales]
Response:
[source,console-result]
--------------------------------------------------
{
...
"aggregations": {
"prices" : {
"buckets": [
{
"key": 0.0,
"doc_count": 1
},
{
"key": 50.0,
"doc_count": 1
},
{
"key": 150.0,
"doc_count": 2
},
{
"key": 200.0,
"doc_count": 3
}
]
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TESTRESPONSE[s/\.\.\./"took": $body.took,"timed_out": false,"_shards": $body._shards,"hits": $body.hits,/]
Added extended_bounds support for date_/histogram aggs By default the date_/histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when when requesting empty buckets (min_doc_count : 0), this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered. To understand why, let's look at an example: Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs from the last month, and in the date_histogram aggs you'd like to slice the data per day. You also specify min_doc_count:0 so that you'd still get empty buckets for those days to which no document belongs. By default, if the first document that fall in this last month also happen to fall on the first day of the **second week** of the month, the date_histogram will **not** return empty buckets for all those days prior to that second week. The reason for that is that by default the histogram aggregations only start building buckets when they encounter documents (hence, missing on all the days of the first week in our example). With extended_bounds, you now can "force" the histogram aggregations to start building buckets on a specific min values and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if the min_doc_count is greater than 0). Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the min bounds is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the min bucket will be (and the same goes to the extended_bounds.max and the max bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram agg under a range filter agg with the appropriate min/max. Closes #5224
2014-03-16 20:06:07 -04:00
[[search-aggregations-bucket-histogram-aggregation-extended-bounds]]
By default the `histogram` returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with
Added extended_bounds support for date_/histogram aggs By default the date_/histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when when requesting empty buckets (min_doc_count : 0), this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered. To understand why, let's look at an example: Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs from the last month, and in the date_histogram aggs you'd like to slice the data per day. You also specify min_doc_count:0 so that you'd still get empty buckets for those days to which no document belongs. By default, if the first document that fall in this last month also happen to fall on the first day of the **second week** of the month, the date_histogram will **not** return empty buckets for all those days prior to that second week. The reason for that is that by default the histogram aggregations only start building buckets when they encounter documents (hence, missing on all the days of the first week in our example). With extended_bounds, you now can "force" the histogram aggregations to start building buckets on a specific min values and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if the min_doc_count is greater than 0). Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the min bounds is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the min bucket will be (and the same goes to the extended_bounds.max and the max bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram agg under a range filter agg with the appropriate min/max. Closes #5224
2014-03-16 20:06:07 -04:00
the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the
documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when
requesting empty buckets, this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered.
Added extended_bounds support for date_/histogram aggs By default the date_/histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when when requesting empty buckets (min_doc_count : 0), this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered. To understand why, let's look at an example: Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs from the last month, and in the date_histogram aggs you'd like to slice the data per day. You also specify min_doc_count:0 so that you'd still get empty buckets for those days to which no document belongs. By default, if the first document that fall in this last month also happen to fall on the first day of the **second week** of the month, the date_histogram will **not** return empty buckets for all those days prior to that second week. The reason for that is that by default the histogram aggregations only start building buckets when they encounter documents (hence, missing on all the days of the first week in our example). With extended_bounds, you now can "force" the histogram aggregations to start building buckets on a specific min values and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if the min_doc_count is greater than 0). Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the min bounds is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the min bucket will be (and the same goes to the extended_bounds.max and the max bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram agg under a range filter agg with the appropriate min/max. Closes #5224
2014-03-16 20:06:07 -04:00
To understand why, let's look at an example:
Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs with values between `0` and `500`, in addition you'd like
to slice the data per price using a histogram with an interval of `50`. You also specify `"min_doc_count" : 0` as you'd
like to get all buckets even the empty ones. If it happens that all products (documents) have prices higher than `100`,
the first bucket you'll get will be the one with `100` as its key. This is confusing, as many times, you'd also like
to get those buckets between `0 - 100`.
With `extended_bounds` setting, you now can "force" the histogram aggregation to start building buckets on a specific
`min` value and also keep on building buckets up to a `max` value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using
Added extended_bounds support for date_/histogram aggs By default the date_/histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when when requesting empty buckets (min_doc_count : 0), this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered. To understand why, let's look at an example: Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs from the last month, and in the date_histogram aggs you'd like to slice the data per day. You also specify min_doc_count:0 so that you'd still get empty buckets for those days to which no document belongs. By default, if the first document that fall in this last month also happen to fall on the first day of the **second week** of the month, the date_histogram will **not** return empty buckets for all those days prior to that second week. The reason for that is that by default the histogram aggregations only start building buckets when they encounter documents (hence, missing on all the days of the first week in our example). With extended_bounds, you now can "force" the histogram aggregations to start building buckets on a specific min values and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if the min_doc_count is greater than 0). Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the min bounds is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the min bucket will be (and the same goes to the extended_bounds.max and the max bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram agg under a range filter agg with the appropriate min/max. Closes #5224
2014-03-16 20:06:07 -04:00
`extended_bounds` only makes sense when `min_doc_count` is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if `min_doc_count`
is greater than 0).
Note that (as the name suggest) `extended_bounds` is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the `extended_bounds.min` is higher
than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the first bucket will be (and the
same goes for the `extended_bounds.max` and the last bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram aggregation
under a range `filter` aggregation with the appropriate `from`/`to` settings.
Example:
[source,console]
Added extended_bounds support for date_/histogram aggs By default the date_/histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when when requesting empty buckets (min_doc_count : 0), this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered. To understand why, let's look at an example: Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs from the last month, and in the date_histogram aggs you'd like to slice the data per day. You also specify min_doc_count:0 so that you'd still get empty buckets for those days to which no document belongs. By default, if the first document that fall in this last month also happen to fall on the first day of the **second week** of the month, the date_histogram will **not** return empty buckets for all those days prior to that second week. The reason for that is that by default the histogram aggregations only start building buckets when they encounter documents (hence, missing on all the days of the first week in our example). With extended_bounds, you now can "force" the histogram aggregations to start building buckets on a specific min values and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if the min_doc_count is greater than 0). Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the min bounds is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the min bucket will be (and the same goes to the extended_bounds.max and the max bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram agg under a range filter agg with the appropriate min/max. Closes #5224
2014-03-16 20:06:07 -04:00
--------------------------------------------------
POST /sales/_search?size=0
Added extended_bounds support for date_/histogram aggs By default the date_/histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when when requesting empty buckets (min_doc_count : 0), this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered. To understand why, let's look at an example: Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs from the last month, and in the date_histogram aggs you'd like to slice the data per day. You also specify min_doc_count:0 so that you'd still get empty buckets for those days to which no document belongs. By default, if the first document that fall in this last month also happen to fall on the first day of the **second week** of the month, the date_histogram will **not** return empty buckets for all those days prior to that second week. The reason for that is that by default the histogram aggregations only start building buckets when they encounter documents (hence, missing on all the days of the first week in our example). With extended_bounds, you now can "force" the histogram aggregations to start building buckets on a specific min values and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if the min_doc_count is greater than 0). Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the min bounds is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the min bucket will be (and the same goes to the extended_bounds.max and the max bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram agg under a range filter agg with the appropriate min/max. Closes #5224
2014-03-16 20:06:07 -04:00
{
"query" : {
"constant_score" : { "filter": { "range" : { "price" : { "to" : "500" } } } }
Added extended_bounds support for date_/histogram aggs By default the date_/histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when when requesting empty buckets (min_doc_count : 0), this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered. To understand why, let's look at an example: Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs from the last month, and in the date_histogram aggs you'd like to slice the data per day. You also specify min_doc_count:0 so that you'd still get empty buckets for those days to which no document belongs. By default, if the first document that fall in this last month also happen to fall on the first day of the **second week** of the month, the date_histogram will **not** return empty buckets for all those days prior to that second week. The reason for that is that by default the histogram aggregations only start building buckets when they encounter documents (hence, missing on all the days of the first week in our example). With extended_bounds, you now can "force" the histogram aggregations to start building buckets on a specific min values and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if the min_doc_count is greater than 0). Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the min bounds is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the min bucket will be (and the same goes to the extended_bounds.max and the max bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram agg under a range filter agg with the appropriate min/max. Closes #5224
2014-03-16 20:06:07 -04:00
},
"aggs" : {
"prices" : {
"histogram" : {
"field" : "price",
"interval" : 50,
"extended_bounds" : {
"min" : 0,
"max" : 500
}
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TEST[setup:sales]
Added extended_bounds support for date_/histogram aggs By default the date_/histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when when requesting empty buckets (min_doc_count : 0), this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered. To understand why, let's look at an example: Lets say the you're filtering your request to get all docs from the last month, and in the date_histogram aggs you'd like to slice the data per day. You also specify min_doc_count:0 so that you'd still get empty buckets for those days to which no document belongs. By default, if the first document that fall in this last month also happen to fall on the first day of the **second week** of the month, the date_histogram will **not** return empty buckets for all those days prior to that second week. The reason for that is that by default the histogram aggregations only start building buckets when they encounter documents (hence, missing on all the days of the first week in our example). With extended_bounds, you now can "force" the histogram aggregations to start building buckets on a specific min values and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if the min_doc_count is greater than 0). Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is **not** filtering buckets. Meaning, if the min bounds is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the min bucket will be (and the same goes to the extended_bounds.max and the max bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram agg under a range filter agg with the appropriate min/max. Closes #5224
2014-03-16 20:06:07 -04:00
When aggregating ranges, buckets are based on the values of the returned documents. This means the response may include
buckets outside of a query's range. For example, if your query looks for values greater than 100, and you have a range
covering 50 to 150, and an interval of 50, that document will land in 3 buckets - 50, 100, and 150. In general, it's
best to think of the query and aggregation steps as independent - the query selects a set of documents, and then the
aggregation buckets those documents without regard to how they were selected.
See <<search-aggregations-bucket-range-field-note,note on bucketing range
fields>> for more information and an example.
==== Order
By default the returned buckets are sorted by their `key` ascending, though the order behaviour can be controlled using
the `order` setting. Supports the same `order` functionality as the <<search-aggregations-bucket-terms-aggregation-order,`Terms Aggregation`>>.
==== Offset
By default the bucket keys start with 0 and then continue in even spaced steps
of `interval`, e.g. if the interval is `10`, the first three buckets (assuming
there is data inside them) will be `[0, 10)`, `[10, 20)`, `[20, 30)`. The bucket
boundaries can be shifted by using the `offset` option.
This can be best illustrated with an example. If there are 10 documents with values ranging from 5 to 14, using interval `10` will result in
two buckets with 5 documents each. If an additional offset `5` is used, there will be only one single bucket `[5, 15)` containing all the 10
documents.
==== Response Format
By default, the buckets are returned as an ordered array. It is also possible to request the response as a hash
instead keyed by the buckets keys:
[source,console]
--------------------------------------------------
POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
"aggs" : {
"prices" : {
"histogram" : {
"field" : "price",
"interval" : 50,
"keyed" : true
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TEST[setup:sales]
Response:
[source,console-result]
--------------------------------------------------
{
...
"aggregations": {
"prices": {
"buckets": {
"0.0": {
"key": 0.0,
"doc_count": 1
},
"50.0": {
"key": 50.0,
"doc_count": 1
},
"100.0": {
"key": 100.0,
"doc_count": 0
},
"150.0": {
"key": 150.0,
"doc_count": 2
},
"200.0": {
"key": 200.0,
"doc_count": 3
}
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TESTRESPONSE[s/\.\.\./"took": $body.took,"timed_out": false,"_shards": $body._shards,"hits": $body.hits,/]
==== Missing value
The `missing` parameter defines how documents that are missing a value should be treated.
By default they will be ignored but it is also possible to treat them as if they
had a value.
[source,console]
--------------------------------------------------
POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
"aggs" : {
"quantity" : {
"histogram" : {
"field" : "quantity",
"interval": 10,
"missing": 0 <1>
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TEST[setup:sales]
<1> Documents without a value in the `quantity` field will fall into the same bucket as documents that have the value `0`.
[[search-aggregations-bucket-histogram-aggregation-histogram-fields]]
==== Histogram fields
Running a histogram aggregation over histogram fields computes the total number of counts for each interval.
For example, executing a histogram aggregation against the following index that stores pre-aggregated histograms
with latency metrics (in milliseconds) for different networks:
[source,console]
--------------------------------------------------
PUT metrics_index/_doc/1
{
"network.name" : "net-1",
"latency_histo" : {
"values" : [1, 3, 8, 12, 15],
"counts" : [3, 7, 23, 12, 6]
}
}
PUT metrics_index/_doc/2
{
"network.name" : "net-2",
"latency_histo" : {
"values" : [1, 6, 8, 12, 14],
"counts" : [8, 17, 8, 7, 6]
}
}
POST /metrics_index/_search?size=0
{
"aggs" : {
"latency_buckets" : {
"histogram" : {
"field" : "latency_histo",
"interval" : 5
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
The `histogram` aggregation will sum the counts of each interval computed based on the `values` and
return the following output:
[source,console-result]
--------------------------------------------------
{
...
"aggregations": {
"prices" : {
"buckets": [
{
"key": 0.0,
"doc_count": 18
},
{
"key": 5.0,
"doc_count": 48
},
{
"key": 10.0,
"doc_count": 25
},
{
"key": 15.0,
"doc_count": 6
}
]
}
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TESTRESPONSE[skip:test not setup]
[IMPORTANT]
========
Histogram aggregation is a bucket aggregation, which partitions documents into buckets rather than calculating metrics over fields like
metrics aggregations do. Each bucket represents a collection of documents which sub-aggregations can run on.
On the other hand, a histogram field is a pre-aggregated field representing multiple values inside a single field:
buckets of numerical data and a count of items/documents for each bucket. This mismatch between the histogram aggregations expected input
(expecting raw documents) and the histogram field (that provides summary information) limits the outcome of the aggregation
to only the doc counts for each bucket.
**Consequently, when executing a histogram aggregation over a histogram field, no sub-aggregations are allowed.**
========
Also, when running histogram aggregation over histogram field the `missing` parameter is not supported.