2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
[[limitations]]
2015-07-15 13:02:11 -04:00
== Limitations
2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
[float]
=== Plugins
Elasticsearch's plugin infrastructure is extremely flexible in terms of what can be extended. While it opens up Elasticsearch
to a wide variety of (often custom) additional functionality, when it comes to security, this high extensibility level
comes at a cost. We have no control over the third-party plugins' code (open source or not) and therefore we cannot
guarantee their compliance with Shield. For this reason, third-party plugins are not officially supported on clusters
with the Shield security plugin installed.
[float]
=== Changes in Index Wildcard Behavior
Elasticsearch clusters with the Shield security plugin installed apply the `/_all` wildcard, and all other wildcards,
to the indices that the current user has privileges for, not the set of all indices on the cluster. There are two
notable results of this behavior:
* Elasticsearch clusters with the Shield security plugin installed do not honor the `ignore_unavailable` option.
This behavior means that requests involving indices that the current user lacks authorization for throw an
`AuthorizationException` error, regardless of the option's setting.
* The `allow_no_indices` option is ignored, resulting in the following behavior: when the final set of indices after
wildcard expansion and replacement is empty, the request throws a `IndexMissingException` error.
As a general principle, core Elasticsearch will return empty results in scenarios where wildcard expansion returns no
indices, while Elasticsearch with Shield returns exceptions. Note that this behavior means that operations with
multiple items will fail the entire set of operations if any one operation throws an exception due to wildcard
expansion resulting in an empty set of authorized indices.
[[limitations-filtered-aliases]]
[float]
=== Filtered Index Aliases
You can combine a secured index alias with a {ref}/query-dsl-filters.html[filter]
to approximate document-level security. By manipulating the specific filtering, you can control the set of documents
that users with privileges on that index alias can access.
WARNING: Filtering secured index aliases does not provide security for documents retrieved through the
{ref}/docs-get.html[get api]. Read
2015-07-15 13:02:11 -04:00
https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/3861[Elasticsearch issue #3861] to learn more about this limitation.
2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
Users can obtain secure near-real-time get under this restriction with searches by document ID, using the
{ref}/search-search.html[search api] instead. Restrict get operations when you use this approach by granting the `search`
privilege and disallowing `get`.
WARNING: In Elasticsearch, issuing a delete operation on an alias also deletes all of the indices that the alias
points to, regardless of the filter that the alias might hold. Keep this behavior in mind when granting users
administrative privileges to filtered index aliases. Read
2015-07-15 13:02:11 -04:00
https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/2318[Elasticsearch issue #2318] to learn more about this limitation.
2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
2015-07-27 13:25:19 -04:00
WARNING: A filtered index alias will not provide document-level security for the {ref}/search-suggesters.html[suggesters apis]
as they do not take into account the filters placed on aliases.
WARNING: A filtered index alias will not provide document-level security when using a
{ref}/search-aggregations-bucket-children-aggregation.html[Children Aggregation] as the filter from the alias is not used
when computing the aggregation results.
2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
[float]
=== Queries and Filters
[[limitations-disable-cache]]
[float]
==== Elasticsearch 1.6+
2015-07-31 10:43:03 -04:00
Elasticsearch 1.6 removes all of the limitations below with queries and filters with the exception of the {ref}/query-dsl-mlt-query.html[More Like This Query].
*But* there is the possibility of authorization being bypassed when using a terms filter with the
2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
{ref}/query-dsl-terms-filter.html#_terms_lookup_mechanism[terms lookup mechanism]. The authorization that could be
2015-07-31 10:43:03 -04:00
bypassed is for the index containing the terms when using Shield 1.2.0 and 1.2.1. If using Shield 1.2.0 or 1.2.1,
add the following setting to your `elasticsearch.yml` file to ensure that requests are properly authorized:
2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
[source,yaml]
--------------------------------------------------
indices.cache.filter.terms.size: 0
--------------------------------------------------
2015-07-31 10:43:03 -04:00
Shield 1.2.2+ does not require this setting to be specified.
Elasticsearch 1.6.2+ and 1.7.1+ remove the limitations on the {ref}/query-dsl-mlt-query.html[More Like This Query].
2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
[float]
==== Elasticsearch pre-1.6.0
Certain Elasticsearch requests execute other requests as part of their implementation. Some of these requests do not
maintain the security context that the original request was made with. This causes an `AuthorizationException` even when
the user has authorization to make the subsequent requests. The following requests have this behavior:
* {ref}/query-dsl-mlt-query.html[More Like This Query]
* {ref}/query-dsl-geo-shape-query.html[GeoShape Query] and {ref}/query-dsl-geo-shape-filter.html[GeoShape Filter] when
used with an {ref}/query-dsl-geo-shape-filter.html#_pre_indexed_shape[indexed shape]
* {ref}/query-dsl-terms-filter.html[Terms Filter] when using the {ref}/query-dsl-terms-filter.html#_terms_lookup_mechanism[terms lookup mechanism]
* {ref}/search-suggesters-phrase.html[Phrase Suggester] when specifying the `collate` field
* Any query using {ref}/modules-scripting.html#_indexed_scripts[indexed scripts]
* Queries using a {ref}/search-template.html[search template]
[float]
=== Document Expiration (_ttl)
Document expiration handled using the built-in {ref}/mapping-ttl-field.html#mapping-ttl-field[`_ttl` (time to live) mechanism]
does not work with Shield. The document deletions will fail and the documents continue to live past their expiration.
[float]
=== LDAP Realm
The <<ldap, LDAP Realm>> does not currently support the discovery of nested LDAP Groups. For example, if a user is a member
2015-07-15 13:02:11 -04:00
of GroupA and GroupA is a member of GroupB, only GroupA will be discovered. However, the <<active-directory, Active Directory Realm>> _does_
2015-07-13 06:31:34 -04:00
support transitive group membership.