[ML] Fix a race condition simultaneous close requests are made for a job (elastic/x-pack-elasticsearch#2913)
When simultaneous close requests were made for the same job it was possible that one of the requests would inappropriately log error messages about the job having failed. This change prevents that problem, whilst continuing to adhere to the requirement that close requests for already closing jobs do not return until the close request that is doing the work completes. relates elastic/x-pack-elasticsearch#2912 Original commit: elastic/x-pack-elasticsearch@513b7fa1d6
This commit is contained in:
parent
8e5855e62e
commit
027f64b221
|
@ -325,12 +325,12 @@ public class AutodetectProcessManager extends AbstractComponent {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void createProcessAndSetRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectParams params, Consumer<Exception> handler) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// At this point we lock the process context until the process has been started.
|
||||
// The reason behind this is to ensure closing the job does not happen before
|
||||
// the process is started as that can result to the job getting seemingly closed
|
||||
// but the actual process is hanging alive.
|
||||
processContext.tryLock();
|
||||
try {
|
||||
AutodetectCommunicator communicator = create(processContext.getJobTask(), params, handler);
|
||||
processContext.setRunning(communicator);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
|
@ -444,8 +444,11 @@ public class AutodetectProcessManager extends AbstractComponent {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
processContext.tryLock();
|
||||
processContext.setDying();
|
||||
processContext.unlock();
|
||||
try {
|
||||
if (processContext.setDying() == false) {
|
||||
logger.debug("Cannot close job [{}] as it has already been closed", jobId);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (reason == null) {
|
||||
logger.info("Closing job [{}]", jobId);
|
||||
|
@ -460,13 +463,17 @@ public class AutodetectProcessManager extends AbstractComponent {
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
communicator.close(restart, reason);
|
||||
processByAllocation.remove(allocationId);
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
logger.warn("[" + jobId + "] Exception closing autodetect process", e);
|
||||
setJobState(jobTask, JobState.FAILED);
|
||||
throw ExceptionsHelper.serverError("Exception closing autodetect process", e);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
// to ensure the contract that multiple simultaneous close calls for the same job wait until
|
||||
// the job is closed is honoured, hold the lock throughout the close procedure so that another
|
||||
// thread that gets into this method blocks until the first thread has finished closing the job
|
||||
processContext.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ final class ProcessContext {
|
|||
state.setRunning(this, autodetectCommunicator);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void setDying() {
|
||||
boolean setDying() {
|
||||
assert lock.isHeldByCurrentThread();
|
||||
state.setDying(this);
|
||||
return state.setDying(this);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
KillBuilder newKillBuilder() {
|
||||
|
@ -134,21 +134,29 @@ final class ProcessContext {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private interface ProcessState {
|
||||
void setRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectCommunicator autodetectCommunicator);
|
||||
void setDying(ProcessContext processContext);
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return was a state change made?
|
||||
* */
|
||||
boolean setRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectCommunicator autodetectCommunicator);
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return was a state change made?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
boolean setDying(ProcessContext processContext);
|
||||
ProcessStateName getName();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static class ProcessNotRunningState implements ProcessState {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void setRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectCommunicator autodetectCommunicator) {
|
||||
public boolean setRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectCommunicator autodetectCommunicator) {
|
||||
processContext.setAutodetectCommunicator(autodetectCommunicator);
|
||||
processContext.setState(new ProcessRunningState());
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void setDying(ProcessContext processContext) {
|
||||
public boolean setDying(ProcessContext processContext) {
|
||||
processContext.setState(new ProcessDyingState());
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
|
@ -160,13 +168,15 @@ final class ProcessContext {
|
|||
private static class ProcessRunningState implements ProcessState {
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void setRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectCommunicator autodetectCommunicator) {
|
||||
public boolean setRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectCommunicator autodetectCommunicator) {
|
||||
LOGGER.debug("Process set to [running] while it was already in that state");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void setDying(ProcessContext processContext) {
|
||||
public boolean setDying(ProcessContext processContext) {
|
||||
processContext.setState(new ProcessDyingState());
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
|
@ -178,13 +188,15 @@ final class ProcessContext {
|
|||
private static class ProcessDyingState implements ProcessState {
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void setRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectCommunicator autodetectCommunicator) {
|
||||
public boolean setRunning(ProcessContext processContext, AutodetectCommunicator autodetectCommunicator) {
|
||||
LOGGER.debug("Process set to [running] while it was in [dying]");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void setDying(ProcessContext processContext) {
|
||||
public boolean setDying(ProcessContext processContext) {
|
||||
LOGGER.debug("Process set to [dying] while it was already in that state");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.ThreadContext;
|
|||
import org.elasticsearch.common.xcontent.NamedXContentRegistry;
|
||||
import org.elasticsearch.common.xcontent.XContentType;
|
||||
import org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase;
|
||||
import org.elasticsearch.test.junit.annotations.TestLogging;
|
||||
import org.elasticsearch.threadpool.ThreadPool;
|
||||
import org.elasticsearch.xpack.ml.action.OpenJobAction.JobTask;
|
||||
import org.elasticsearch.xpack.ml.job.JobManager;
|
||||
|
@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
|
|||
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
|
||||
import java.util.function.BiConsumer;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Consumer;
|
||||
|
@ -308,6 +310,46 @@ public class AutodetectProcessManagerTests extends ESTestCase {
|
|||
assertEquals(0, manager.numberOfOpenJobs());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// DEBUG logging makes it possible to see exactly how the two threads
|
||||
// interleaved in the AutodetectProcessManager.close() call
|
||||
@TestLogging("org.elasticsearch.xpack.ml.job.process.autodetect:DEBUG")
|
||||
public void testCanCloseClosingJob() throws Exception {
|
||||
AutodetectCommunicator communicator = mock(AutodetectCommunicator.class);
|
||||
AtomicInteger numberOfCommunicatorCloses = new AtomicInteger(0);
|
||||
doAnswer(invocationOnMock -> {
|
||||
numberOfCommunicatorCloses.incrementAndGet();
|
||||
// This increases the chance of the two threads both getting into
|
||||
// the middle of the AutodetectProcessManager.close() method
|
||||
Thread.yield();
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}).when(communicator).close(anyBoolean(), anyString());
|
||||
AutodetectProcessManager manager = createManager(communicator);
|
||||
assertEquals(0, manager.numberOfOpenJobs());
|
||||
|
||||
JobTask jobTask = mock(JobTask.class);
|
||||
when(jobTask.getJobId()).thenReturn("foo");
|
||||
manager.openJob(jobTask, e -> {});
|
||||
manager.processData(jobTask, createInputStream(""), randomFrom(XContentType.values()),
|
||||
mock(DataLoadParams.class), (dataCounts1, e) -> {});
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(1, manager.numberOfOpenJobs());
|
||||
|
||||
// Close the job in a separate thread
|
||||
Thread closeThread = new Thread(() -> manager.closeJob(jobTask, false, "in separate thread"));
|
||||
closeThread.start();
|
||||
Thread.yield();
|
||||
|
||||
// Also close the job in the current thread, so that we have two simultaneous close requests
|
||||
manager.closeJob(jobTask, false, "in main test thread");
|
||||
|
||||
closeThread.join(500);
|
||||
assertFalse(closeThread.isAlive());
|
||||
|
||||
// Only one of the threads should have called AutodetectCommunicator.close()
|
||||
assertEquals(1, numberOfCommunicatorCloses.get());
|
||||
assertEquals(0, manager.numberOfOpenJobs());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testCanKillClosingJob() throws Exception {
|
||||
CountDownLatch closeStartedLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
|
||||
CountDownLatch killLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue