Fix for Jenkins advice on SignificantTermsAggregatorFactory, changing a small switch statement to an if-else

This commit is contained in:
markharwood 2014-03-20 10:59:00 +00:00
parent 644fdfc4aa
commit 0cd184ef3c
1 changed files with 7 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -102,29 +102,27 @@ public class SignificantTermsAggregatorFactory extends ValueSourceAggregatorFact
protected Aggregator create(ValuesSource valuesSource, long expectedBucketsCount, AggregationContext aggregationContext, Aggregator parent) {
numberOfAggregatorsCreated++;
switch (numberOfAggregatorsCreated) {
case 1:
if (numberOfAggregatorsCreated == 1) {
// Setup a termsEnum for use by first aggregator
try {
SearchContext searchContext = aggregationContext.searchContext();
ContextIndexSearcher searcher = searchContext.searcher();
Terms terms = MultiFields.getTerms(searcher.getIndexReader(), indexedFieldName);
//terms can be null if the choice of field is not found in this index
// terms can be null if the choice of field is not found in this index
if (terms != null) {
termsEnum = terms.iterator(null);
}
}
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new ElasticsearchException("IOException loading background document frequency info", e);
}
break;
case 2:
// When we have > 1 agg we have possibility of duplicate term frequency lookups and so introduce a cache
// in the form of a wrapper around the plain termsEnum created for use with the first agg
} else if (numberOfAggregatorsCreated == 2) {
// When we have > 1 agg we have possibility of duplicate term frequency lookups and
// so introduce a cache in the form of a wrapper around the plain termsEnum created
// for use with the first agg
if (termsEnum != null) {
SearchContext searchContext = aggregationContext.searchContext();
termsEnum = new FrequencyCachingTermsEnumWrapper(termsEnum, searchContext.bigArrays(), true, false);
}
break;
}
long estimatedBucketCount = valuesSource.metaData().maxAtomicUniqueValuesCount();