Add magic $_path stash key to docs tests (#24724)
Adds a "magic" key to the yaml testing stash mostly for use with documentation tests. When unstashing an object, `$_path` is the path into the current position in the object you are unstashing. This means that in docs tests you can use `// TESTRESPONSEs/somevalue/$body.${_path}/` to mean "replace `somevalue` with whatever is the response in the same position." Compare how you must carefully mock out all the numbers in the profile response without this change: ``` // TESTRESPONSE[s/"id": "\[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ\]\[twitter\]\[1\]"/"id": $body.profile.shards.0.id/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"rewrite_time": 51443/"rewrite_time": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.rewrite_time/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 51306/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.score/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "1873811"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.time_in_nanos/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 2935582/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.build_scorer/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 919297/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.create_weight/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 53876/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.next_doc/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "391943"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.time_in_nanos/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 28776/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.score/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 784451/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.build_scorer/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 1669564/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.create_weight/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 10111/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.next_doc/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "210682"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.time_in_nanos/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 4552/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.score/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 42602/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.build_scorer/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 89323/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.create_weight/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 2852/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.next_doc/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "304311"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector.0.time_in_nanos/] // TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "32273"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector.0.children.0.time_in_nanos/] ``` To how you can cavalierly mock all the numbers at once with this change: ``` // TESTRESPONSE[s/(?<=[" ])\d+(\.\d+)?/$body.$_path/] ```
This commit is contained in:
parent
24a8ba5ca8
commit
13a86fec99
|
@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ public class RestTestsFromSnippetsTask extends SnippetsTask {
|
|||
current.println(" - skip:")
|
||||
current.println(" features: ")
|
||||
current.println(" - stash_in_key")
|
||||
current.println(" - stash_in_path")
|
||||
current.println(" - stash_path_replace")
|
||||
current.println(" - warnings")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (test.skipTest) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ public class SnippetsTask extends DefaultTask {
|
|||
* tests cleaner.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
subst = subst.replace('$body', '\\$body')
|
||||
subst = subst.replace('$_path', '\\$_path')
|
||||
// \n is a new line....
|
||||
subst = subst.replace('\\n', '\n')
|
||||
snippet.contents = snippet.contents.replaceAll(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ for its modifiers:
|
|||
how it works. These are much more common than `// TEST[s/foo/bar]` because
|
||||
they are useful for eliding portions of the response that are not pertinent
|
||||
to the documentation.
|
||||
* One interesting difference here is that you often want to match against
|
||||
the response from Elasticsearch. To do that you can reference the "body" of
|
||||
the response like this: `// TESTRESPONSE[s/"took": 25/"took": $body.took/]`.
|
||||
Note the `$body` string. This says "I don't expect that 25 number in the
|
||||
response, just match against what is in the response." Instead of writing
|
||||
the path into the response after `$body` you can write `$_path` which
|
||||
"figures out" the path. This is especially useful for making sweeping
|
||||
assertions like "I made up all the numbers in this example, don't compare
|
||||
them" which looks like `// TESTRESPONSE[s/\d+/$body.$_path/]`.
|
||||
* `// TESTRESPONSE[_cat]`: Add substitutions for testing `_cat` responses. Use
|
||||
this after all other substitutions so it doesn't make other substitutions
|
||||
difficult.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ This will yield the following result:
|
|||
"profile": {
|
||||
"shards": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ][twitter][1]",
|
||||
"id": "[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ][twitter][0]",
|
||||
"searches": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"query": [
|
||||
|
@ -139,27 +139,9 @@ This will yield the following result:
|
|||
}
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"took": 25/"took": $body.took/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"hits": \[...\]/"hits": $body.hits.hits/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"id": "\[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ\]\[twitter\]\[1\]"/"id": $body.profile.shards.0.id/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"rewrite_time": 51443/"rewrite_time": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.rewrite_time/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 51306/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.score/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "1873811"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.time_in_nanos/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 2935582/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.build_scorer/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 919297/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.create_weight/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 53876/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.next_doc/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "391943"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.time_in_nanos/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 28776/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.score/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 784451/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.build_scorer/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 1669564/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.create_weight/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 10111/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.next_doc/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "210682"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.time_in_nanos/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 4552/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.score/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 42602/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.build_scorer/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 89323/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.create_weight/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 2852/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.next_doc/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "304311"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector.0.time_in_nanos/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "32273"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector.0.children.0.time_in_nanos/]
|
||||
// Sorry for this mess....
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"hits": \[...\]/"hits": $body.$_path/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/(?<=[" ])\d+(\.\d+)?/$body.$_path/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/\[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ\]\[twitter\]\[0\]/$body.$_path/]
|
||||
|
||||
<1> Search results are returned, but were omitted here for brevity
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -174,7 +156,7 @@ First, the overall structure of the profile response is as follows:
|
|||
"profile": {
|
||||
"shards": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ][twitter][1]", <1>
|
||||
"id": "[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ][twitter][0]", <1>
|
||||
"searches": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"query": [...], <2>
|
||||
|
@ -189,10 +171,10 @@ First, the overall structure of the profile response is as follows:
|
|||
}
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"profile": /"took": $body.took, "timed_out": $body.timed_out, "_shards": $body._shards, "hits": $body.hits, "profile": /]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"id": "\[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ\]\[twitter\]\[1\]"/"id": $body.profile.shards.0.id/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"query": \[...\]/"query": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"rewrite_time": 51443/"rewrite_time": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.rewrite_time/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"collector": \[...\]/"collector": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/(?<=[" ])\d+(\.\d+)?/$body.$_path/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/\[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ\]\[twitter\]\[0\]/$body.$_path/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"query": \[...\]/"query": $body.$_path/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"collector": \[...\]/"collector": $body.$_path/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"aggregations": \[...\]/"aggregations": []/]
|
||||
<1> A profile is returned for each shard that participated in the response, and is identified
|
||||
by a unique ID
|
||||
|
@ -267,11 +249,10 @@ The overall structure of this query tree will resemble your original Elasticsear
|
|||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/^/{\n"took": $body.took,\n"timed_out": $body.timed_out,\n"_shards": $body._shards,\n"hits": $body.hits,\n"profile": {\n"shards": [ {\n"id": "$body.profile.shards.0.id",\n"searches": [{\n/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/]$/],"rewrite_time": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.rewrite_time, "collector": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector}], "aggregations": []}]}}/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "1873811",\n.+"breakdown": \{...\}/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.time_in_nanos, "breakdown": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "391943",\n.+"breakdown": \{...\}/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.time_in_nanos, "breakdown": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "210682",\n.+"breakdown": \{...\}/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.time_in_nanos, "breakdown": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/^/{\n"took": $body.took,\n"timed_out": $body.timed_out,\n"_shards": $body._shards,\n"hits": $body.hits,\n"profile": {\n"shards": [ {\n"id": "$body.$_path",\n"searches": [{\n/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/]$/],"rewrite_time": $body.$_path, "collector": $body.$_path}], "aggregations": []}]}}/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/(?<=[" ])\d+(\.\d+)?/$body.$_path/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"breakdown": \{...\}/"breakdown": $body.$_path/]
|
||||
<1> The breakdown timings are omitted for simplicity
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the profile structure, we can see that our `match` query was rewritten by Lucene into a BooleanQuery with two
|
||||
|
@ -309,13 +290,9 @@ The `breakdown` component lists detailed timing statistics about low-level Lucen
|
|||
"advance_count": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/^/{\n"took": $body.took,\n"timed_out": $body.timed_out,\n"_shards": $body._shards,\n"hits": $body.hits,\n"profile": {\n"shards": [ {\n"id": "$body.profile.shards.0.id",\n"searches": [{\n"query": [{\n"type": "BooleanQuery",\n"description": "message:message message:number",\n"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.time_in_nanos,/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/}$/},\n"children": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children}],\n"rewrite_time": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.rewrite_time, "collector": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector}], "aggregations": []}]}}/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 51306/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.score/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "1873811"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.time_in_nanos/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 2935582/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.build_scorer/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 919297/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.create_weight/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 53876/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.next_doc/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/^/{\n"took": $body.took,\n"timed_out": $body.timed_out,\n"_shards": $body._shards,\n"hits": $body.hits,\n"profile": {\n"shards": [ {\n"id": "$body.$_path",\n"searches": [{\n"query": [{\n"type": "BooleanQuery",\n"description": "message:message message:number",\n"time_in_nanos": $body.$_path,/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/}$/},\n"children": $body.$_path}],\n"rewrite_time": $body.$_path, "collector": $body.$_path}], "aggregations": []}]}}/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/(?<=[" ])\d+(\.\d+)?/$body.$_path/]
|
||||
|
||||
Timings are listed in wall-clock nanoseconds and are not normalized at all. All caveats about the overall
|
||||
`time_in_nanos` apply here. The intention of the breakdown is to give you a feel for A) what machinery in Lucene is
|
||||
|
@ -416,10 +393,9 @@ Looking at the previous example:
|
|||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/^/{\n"took": $body.took,\n"timed_out": $body.timed_out,\n"_shards": $body._shards,\n"hits": $body.hits,\n"profile": {\n"shards": [ {\n"id": "$body.profile.shards.0.id",\n"searches": [{\n"query": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query,\n"rewrite_time": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.rewrite_time,/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/^/{\n"took": $body.took,\n"timed_out": $body.timed_out,\n"_shards": $body._shards,\n"hits": $body.hits,\n"profile": {\n"shards": [ {\n"id": "$body.$_path",\n"searches": [{\n"query": $body.$_path,\n"rewrite_time": $body.$_path,/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/]$/]}], "aggregations": []}]}}/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "304311"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector.0.time_in_nanos/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "32273"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector.0.children.0.time_in_nanos/]
|
||||
// TESTRESPONSE[s/(?<=[" ])\d+(\.\d+)?/$body.$_path/]
|
||||
|
||||
We see a single collector named `SimpleTopScoreDocCollector` wrapped into `CancellableCollector`. `SimpleTopScoreDocCollector` is the default "scoring and sorting"
|
||||
`Collector` used by Elasticsearch. The `reason` field attempts to give a plain english description of the class name. The
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ public final class Features {
|
|||
"headers",
|
||||
"stash_in_key",
|
||||
"stash_in_path",
|
||||
"stash_path_replace",
|
||||
"warnings",
|
||||
"yaml"));
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ import org.elasticsearch.common.xcontent.XContentBuilder;
|
|||
import java.io.IOException;
|
||||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
import java.util.HashMap;
|
||||
import java.util.Iterator;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.Map;
|
||||
import java.util.TreeMap;
|
||||
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
|
||||
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ import java.util.regex.Pattern;
|
|||
*/
|
||||
public class Stash implements ToXContent {
|
||||
private static final Pattern EXTENDED_KEY = Pattern.compile("\\$\\{([^}]+)\\}");
|
||||
private static final Pattern PATH = Pattern.compile("\\$_path");
|
||||
|
||||
private static final Logger logger = Loggers.getLogger(Stash.class);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -125,19 +126,22 @@ public class Stash implements ToXContent {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // Safe because we check that all the map keys are string in unstashObject
|
||||
public Map<String, Object> replaceStashedValues(Map<String, Object> map) throws IOException {
|
||||
return (Map<String, Object>) unstashObject(map);
|
||||
return (Map<String, Object>) unstashObject(new ArrayList<>(), map);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private Object unstashObject(Object obj) throws IOException {
|
||||
private Object unstashObject(List<Object> path, Object obj) throws IOException {
|
||||
if (obj instanceof List) {
|
||||
List<?> list = (List<?>) obj;
|
||||
List<Object> result = new ArrayList<>();
|
||||
int index = 0;
|
||||
for (Object o : list) {
|
||||
path.add(index++);
|
||||
if (containsStashedValue(o)) {
|
||||
result.add(getValue(o.toString()));
|
||||
result.add(getValue(path, o.toString()));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
result.add(unstashObject(o));
|
||||
result.add(unstashObject(path, o));
|
||||
}
|
||||
path.remove(path.size() - 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -150,11 +154,13 @@ public class Stash implements ToXContent {
|
|||
if (containsStashedValue(key)) {
|
||||
key = getValue(key).toString();
|
||||
}
|
||||
path.add(key);
|
||||
if (containsStashedValue(value)) {
|
||||
value = getValue(value.toString());
|
||||
value = getValue(path, value.toString());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
value = unstashObject(value);
|
||||
value = unstashObject(path, value);
|
||||
}
|
||||
path.remove(path.size() - 1);
|
||||
if (null != result.putIfAbsent(key, value)) {
|
||||
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unstashing has caused a key conflict! The map is [" + result + "] and the key is ["
|
||||
+ entry.getKey() + "] which unstashes to [" + key + "]");
|
||||
|
@ -165,6 +171,34 @@ public class Stash implements ToXContent {
|
|||
return obj;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Lookup a value from the stash adding support for a special key ({@code $_path}) which
|
||||
* returns a string that is the location in the path of the of the object currently being
|
||||
* unstashed. This is useful during documentation testing.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private Object getValue(List<Object> path, String key) throws IOException {
|
||||
Matcher matcher = PATH.matcher(key);
|
||||
if (false == matcher.find()) {
|
||||
return getValue(key);
|
||||
}
|
||||
StringBuilder pathBuilder = new StringBuilder();
|
||||
Iterator<Object> element = path.iterator();
|
||||
if (element.hasNext()) {
|
||||
pathBuilder.append(element.next());
|
||||
while (element.hasNext()) {
|
||||
pathBuilder.append('.');
|
||||
pathBuilder.append(element.next());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
String builtPath = Matcher.quoteReplacement(pathBuilder.toString());
|
||||
StringBuffer newKey = new StringBuffer(key.length());
|
||||
do {
|
||||
matcher.appendReplacement(newKey, builtPath);
|
||||
} while (matcher.find());
|
||||
matcher.appendTail(newKey);
|
||||
return getValue(newKey.toString());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public XContentBuilder toXContent(XContentBuilder builder, Params params) throws IOException {
|
||||
builder.field("stash", stash);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -95,7 +95,6 @@ public class StashTests extends ESTestCase {
|
|||
+ key + "] which unstashes to [foobar]");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
public void testReplaceStashedValuesStashKeyInList() throws IOException {
|
||||
Stash stash = new Stash();
|
||||
stash.stashValue("stashed", "bar");
|
||||
|
@ -117,4 +116,43 @@ public class StashTests extends ESTestCase {
|
|||
assertEquals(expected, actual);
|
||||
assertThat(actual, not(sameInstance(map)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testPathInList() throws IOException {
|
||||
Stash stash = new Stash();
|
||||
stash.stashValue("body", singletonMap("foo", Arrays.asList("a", "b")));
|
||||
|
||||
Map<String, Object> expected;
|
||||
Map<String, Object> map;
|
||||
if (randomBoolean()) {
|
||||
expected = singletonMap("foo", Arrays.asList("test", "boooooh!"));
|
||||
map = singletonMap("foo", Arrays.asList("test", "${body.$_path}oooooh!"));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
expected = singletonMap("foo", Arrays.asList("test", "b"));
|
||||
map = singletonMap("foo", Arrays.asList("test", "$body.$_path"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Map<String, Object> actual = stash.replaceStashedValues(map);
|
||||
assertEquals(expected, actual);
|
||||
assertThat(actual, not(sameInstance(map)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testPathInMapValue() throws IOException {
|
||||
Stash stash = new Stash();
|
||||
stash.stashValue("body", singletonMap("foo", singletonMap("a", "b")));
|
||||
|
||||
Map<String, Object> expected;
|
||||
Map<String, Object> map;
|
||||
if (randomBoolean()) {
|
||||
expected = singletonMap("foo", singletonMap("a", "boooooh!"));
|
||||
map = singletonMap("foo", singletonMap("a", "${body.$_path}oooooh!"));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
expected = singletonMap("foo", singletonMap("a", "b"));
|
||||
map = singletonMap("foo", singletonMap("a", "$body.$_path"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Map<String, Object> actual = stash.replaceStashedValues(map);
|
||||
assertEquals(expected, actual);
|
||||
assertThat(actual, not(sameInstance(map)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue