Change DiskThresholdDecider's behavior when factoring in leaving shards

This changes DiskThresholdDecider to only factor in leaving shards when
checking if a shard can remain. Previously, leaving shards were factored
in for both the `canAllocate` and `canRemain` checks, however, this
makes only the leaving shard sizes subtracted in the `canRemain` check.

It was possible that multiple shards relocating away from the node would
have their entire size subtracted, and the node had a chance to go over
the disk threshold (or hit the disk full) because it subtracted space
that was still being used for other in-progress relocations.
This commit is contained in:
Lee Hinman 2016-08-30 13:48:23 -06:00
parent fd3392aef8
commit 28d3c4488e
2 changed files with 20 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -78,8 +78,7 @@ public class DiskThresholdDecider extends AllocationDecider {
* Returns the size of all shards that are currently being relocated to
* the node, but may not be finished transferring yet.
*
* If subtractShardsMovingAway is set then the size of shards moving away is subtracted from the total size
* of all shards
* If subtractShardsMovingAway is true then the size of shards moving away is subtracted from the total size of all shards
*/
static long sizeOfRelocatingShards(RoutingNode node, RoutingAllocation allocation,
boolean subtractShardsMovingAway, String dataPath) {
@ -111,7 +110,9 @@ public class DiskThresholdDecider extends AllocationDecider {
final double usedDiskThresholdLow = 100.0 - diskThresholdSettings.getFreeDiskThresholdLow();
final double usedDiskThresholdHigh = 100.0 - diskThresholdSettings.getFreeDiskThresholdHigh();
DiskUsage usage = getDiskUsage(node, allocation, usages);
// subtractLeavingShards is passed as false here, because they still use disk space, and therefore should we should be extra careful
// and take the size into account
DiskUsage usage = getDiskUsage(node, allocation, usages, false);
// First, check that the node currently over the low watermark
double freeDiskPercentage = usage.getFreeDiskAsPercentage();
// Cache the used disk percentage for displaying disk percentages consistent with documentation
@ -243,7 +244,9 @@ public class DiskThresholdDecider extends AllocationDecider {
return decision;
}
final DiskUsage usage = getDiskUsage(node, allocation, usages);
// subtractLeavingShards is passed as true here, since this is only for shards remaining, we will *eventually* have enough disk
// since shards are moving away. No new shards will be incoming since in canAllocate we pass false for this check.
final DiskUsage usage = getDiskUsage(node, allocation, usages, true);
final String dataPath = clusterInfo.getDataPath(shardRouting);
// If this node is already above the high threshold, the shard cannot remain (get it off!)
final double freeDiskPercentage = usage.getFreeDiskAsPercentage();
@ -280,7 +283,8 @@ public class DiskThresholdDecider extends AllocationDecider {
"there is enough disk on this node for the shard to remain, free: [%s]", new ByteSizeValue(freeBytes));
}
private DiskUsage getDiskUsage(RoutingNode node, RoutingAllocation allocation, ImmutableOpenMap<String, DiskUsage> usages) {
private DiskUsage getDiskUsage(RoutingNode node, RoutingAllocation allocation,
ImmutableOpenMap<String, DiskUsage> usages, boolean subtractLeavingShards) {
DiskUsage usage = usages.get(node.nodeId());
if (usage == null) {
// If there is no usage, and we have other nodes in the cluster,
@ -293,7 +297,7 @@ public class DiskThresholdDecider extends AllocationDecider {
}
if (diskThresholdSettings.includeRelocations()) {
long relocatingShardsSize = sizeOfRelocatingShards(node, allocation, true, usage.getPath());
long relocatingShardsSize = sizeOfRelocatingShards(node, allocation, subtractLeavingShards, usage.getPath());
DiskUsage usageIncludingRelocations = new DiskUsage(node.nodeId(), node.node().getName(), usage.getPath(),
usage.getTotalBytes(), usage.getFreeBytes() - relocatingShardsSize);
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {

View File

@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
import static java.util.Collections.emptyMap;
import static java.util.Collections.singleton;
@ -729,10 +730,9 @@ public class DiskThresholdDeciderTests extends ESAllocationTestCase {
ImmutableOpenMap<String, Long> shardSizes = shardSizesBuilder.build();
final ClusterInfo clusterInfo = new DevNullClusterInfo(usages, usages, shardSizes);
DiskThresholdDecider decider = makeDecider(diskSettings);
AllocationDeciders deciders = new AllocationDeciders(Settings.EMPTY,
new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(
new SameShardAllocationDecider(Settings.EMPTY),
makeDecider(diskSettings))));
new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(new SameShardAllocationDecider(Settings.EMPTY), decider)));
ClusterInfoService cis = new ClusterInfoService() {
@Override
@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ public class DiskThresholdDeciderTests extends ESAllocationTestCase {
ImmutableOpenMap.Builder<String, Long> shardSizesBuilder = ImmutableOpenMap.builder();
shardSizesBuilder.put("[test][0][p]", 40L);
shardSizesBuilder.put("[test][1][p]", 40L);
shardSizesBuilder.put("[foo][0][p]", 10L);
ImmutableOpenMap<String, Long> shardSizes = shardSizesBuilder.build();
final ClusterInfo clusterInfo = new DevNullClusterInfo(usages, usages, shardSizes);
@ -839,10 +840,12 @@ public class DiskThresholdDeciderTests extends ESAllocationTestCase {
DiskThresholdDecider diskThresholdDecider = makeDecider(diskSettings);
MetaData metaData = MetaData.builder()
.put(IndexMetaData.builder("test").settings(settings(Version.CURRENT)).numberOfShards(2).numberOfReplicas(0))
.put(IndexMetaData.builder("foo").settings(settings(Version.CURRENT)).numberOfShards(1).numberOfReplicas(0))
.build();
RoutingTable initialRoutingTable = RoutingTable.builder()
.addAsNew(metaData.index("test"))
.addAsNew(metaData.index("foo"))
.build();
DiscoveryNode discoveryNode1 = new DiscoveryNode("node1", new LocalTransportAddress("1"), emptyMap(),
@ -881,6 +884,7 @@ public class DiskThresholdDeciderTests extends ESAllocationTestCase {
// Two shards consuming each 80% of disk space while 70% is allowed, but one is relocating, so shard 0 can stay
firstRouting = TestShardRouting.newShardRouting("test", 0, "node1", null, true, ShardRoutingState.STARTED);
secondRouting = TestShardRouting.newShardRouting("test", 1, "node1", "node2", true, ShardRoutingState.RELOCATING);
ShardRouting fooRouting = TestShardRouting.newShardRouting("foo", 0, "node1", null, true, ShardRoutingState.UNASSIGNED);
firstRoutingNode = new RoutingNode("node1", discoveryNode1, firstRouting, secondRouting);
builder = RoutingTable.builder().add(
IndexRoutingTable.builder(firstRouting.index())
@ -898,6 +902,8 @@ public class DiskThresholdDeciderTests extends ESAllocationTestCase {
false);
decision = diskThresholdDecider.canRemain(firstRouting, firstRoutingNode, routingAllocation);
assertThat(decision.type(), equalTo(Decision.Type.YES));
decision = diskThresholdDecider.canAllocate(fooRouting, firstRoutingNode, routingAllocation);
assertThat(decision.type(), equalTo(Decision.Type.NO));
// Creating AllocationService instance and the services it depends on...
ClusterInfoService cis = new ClusterInfoService() {