Sub-fields should not accept `include_in_all` parameter (#21971)

Fail to update mapping when multifield has `include_in_all`.

Closes #21710
This commit is contained in:
Nik Everett 2016-12-19 15:07:00 -05:00 committed by GitHub
commit 2e1d152fc0
2 changed files with 70 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -222,7 +222,11 @@ public class TypeParsers {
builder.indexOptions(nodeIndexOptionValue(propNode)); builder.indexOptions(nodeIndexOptionValue(propNode));
iterator.remove(); iterator.remove();
} else if (propName.equals("include_in_all")) { } else if (propName.equals("include_in_all")) {
builder.includeInAll(nodeBooleanValue("include_in_all", propNode, parserContext)); if (parserContext.isWithinMultiField()) {
throw new MapperParsingException("include_in_all in multi fields is not allowed. Found the include_in_all in field [" + name + "] which is within a multi field.");
} else {
builder.includeInAll(nodeBooleanValue("include_in_all", propNode, parserContext));
}
iterator.remove(); iterator.remove();
} else if (propName.equals("similarity")) { } else if (propName.equals("similarity")) {
SimilarityProvider similarityProvider = resolveSimilarity(parserContext, name, propNode.toString()); SimilarityProvider similarityProvider = resolveSimilarity(parserContext, name, propNode.toString());

View File

@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
/*
* Licensed to Elasticsearch under one or more contributor
* license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright
* ownership. Elasticsearch licenses this file to you under
* the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
* not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
* software distributed under the License is distributed on an
* "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
* KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
* specific language governing permissions and limitations
* under the License.
*/
package org.elasticsearch.index.mapper;
import org.elasticsearch.common.compress.CompressedXContent;
import org.elasticsearch.common.settings.Settings;
import org.elasticsearch.common.xcontent.XContentBuilder;
import org.elasticsearch.index.MapperTestUtils;
import org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase;
import java.io.IOException;
import static org.elasticsearch.common.xcontent.XContentFactory.jsonBuilder;
import static org.hamcrest.core.IsEqual.equalTo;
public class MultiFieldIncludeInAllMapperTests extends ESTestCase {
public void testExceptionForIncludeInAllInMultiFields() throws IOException {
XContentBuilder mapping = createMappingWithIncludeInAllInMultiField();
// first check that for newer versions we throw exception if include_in_all is found withing multi field
MapperService mapperService = MapperTestUtils.newMapperService(createTempDir(), Settings.EMPTY);
Exception e = expectThrows(MapperParsingException.class, () -> mapperService.parse("type", new CompressedXContent(mapping.string()), true));
assertThat(e.getMessage(), equalTo("include_in_all in multi fields is not allowed. Found the include_in_all in field [c] which is within a multi field."));
}
private static XContentBuilder createMappingWithIncludeInAllInMultiField() throws IOException {
XContentBuilder mapping = jsonBuilder();
mapping.startObject()
.startObject("type")
.startObject("properties")
.startObject("a")
.field("type", "text")
.endObject()
.startObject("b")
.field("type", "text")
.startObject("fields")
.startObject("c")
.field("type", "text")
.field("include_in_all", false)
.endObject()
.endObject()
.endObject()
.endObject()
.endObject()
.endObject();
return mapping;
}
}