Ignore ILM indices in the TerminalPolicyStep (#55184)
Prior to the change in #51631 indices were moved to the `TerminalPolicyStep` when their ILM actions had completed. Once we switched ILM to stop in the last policy configured, these steps because inaccessible from the policy's perspective. This meant that indices upgraded from ES prior to 7.7.0 could see the following error spammed in their logs every 10 minutes (by default) for every index in this state: ``` [2020-04-14T15:52:23,764][ERROR][o.e.x.i.IndexLifecycleRunner] [midgar] current step [{"phase":"completed","action":"completed","name":"completed"}] for index [foo] with policy [full] is not recognized ``` This changes the runner to ignore these steps, which is what is desired anyway since the index is already in the terminal phase.
This commit is contained in:
parent
18dc2f7330
commit
36f6e542a2
|
@ -134,8 +134,15 @@ class IndexLifecycleRunner {
|
|||
markPolicyDoesNotExist(policy, indexMetadata.getIndex(), lifecycleState);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Step.StepKey currentStepKey = LifecycleExecutionState.getCurrentStepKey(lifecycleState);
|
||||
if (TerminalPolicyStep.KEY.equals(currentStepKey)) {
|
||||
// This index is a leftover from before we halted execution on the final phase
|
||||
// instead of going to the completed phase, so it's okay to ignore this index
|
||||
// for now
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
logger.error("current step [{}] for index [{}] with policy [{}] is not recognized",
|
||||
LifecycleExecutionState.getCurrentStepKey(lifecycleState), index, policy);
|
||||
currentStepKey, index, policy);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -263,8 +270,15 @@ class IndexLifecycleRunner {
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (currentStep == null) {
|
||||
Step.StepKey currentStepKey = LifecycleExecutionState.getCurrentStepKey(lifecycleState);
|
||||
if (TerminalPolicyStep.KEY.equals(currentStepKey)) {
|
||||
// This index is a leftover from before we halted execution on the final phase
|
||||
// instead of going to the completed phase, so it's okay to ignore this index
|
||||
// for now
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
logger.warn("current step [{}] for index [{}] with policy [{}] is not recognized",
|
||||
LifecycleExecutionState.getCurrentStepKey(lifecycleState), index, policy);
|
||||
currentStepKey, index, policy);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -323,8 +337,15 @@ class IndexLifecycleRunner {
|
|||
markPolicyDoesNotExist(policy, indexMetadata.getIndex(), lifecycleState);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Step.StepKey currentStepKey = LifecycleExecutionState.getCurrentStepKey(lifecycleState);
|
||||
if (TerminalPolicyStep.KEY.equals(currentStepKey)) {
|
||||
// This index is a leftover from before we halted execution on the final phase
|
||||
// instead of going to the completed phase, so it's okay to ignore this index
|
||||
// for now
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
logger.error("current step [{}] for index [{}] with policy [{}] is not recognized",
|
||||
LifecycleExecutionState.getCurrentStepKey(lifecycleState), index, policy);
|
||||
currentStepKey, index, policy);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue