[7.x] Allow forcemerge in the hot phase for ILM policies (#520… (#52083)

* Allow forcemerge in the hot phase for ILM policies

This commit changes the `forcemerge` action to also be allowed in the `hot` phase for policies. The
forcemerge will occur after a rollover, and allows users to take advantage of higher disk speeds for
performing the force merge (on a separate node type, for example).

On caveat with this is that a `forcemerge` in the `hot` phase *MUST* be accompanied by a `rollover`
action. ILM validates policies to ensure this is the case.

Resolves #43165

* Use anyMatch instead of findAny in validation

* Make randomTimeseriesLifecyclePolicy single-pass
This commit is contained in:
Lee Hinman 2020-02-10 08:54:49 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent d8169e5fdc
commit 37a2e9bac6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
5 changed files with 90 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -287,11 +287,15 @@ PUT _ilm/policy/my_policy
[[ilm-forcemerge-action]]
==== Force Merge
Phases allowed: warm.
Phases allowed: hot, warm.
NOTE: Index will be be made read-only when this action is run
(see: <<dynamic-index-settings,index.blocks.write>>)
NOTE: If the `forcemerge` action is used in the `hot` phase, the `rollover` action *must* be preset.
ILM validates this predicate and will refuse a policy with a forcemerge in the hot phase without a
rollover action.
The Force Merge Action <<indices-forcemerge,force merges>> the index into at
most a specific number of <<indices-segments,segments>>.

View File

@ -31,8 +31,13 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
public static final TimeseriesLifecycleType INSTANCE = new TimeseriesLifecycleType();
public static final String TYPE = "timeseries";
static final List<String> VALID_PHASES = Arrays.asList("hot", "warm", "cold", "delete");
static final List<String> ORDERED_VALID_HOT_ACTIONS = Arrays.asList(SetPriorityAction.NAME, UnfollowAction.NAME, RolloverAction.NAME);
static final String HOT_PHASE = "hot";
static final String WARM_PHASE = "warm";
static final String COLD_PHASE = "cold";
static final String DELETE_PHASE = "delete";
static final List<String> VALID_PHASES = Arrays.asList(HOT_PHASE, WARM_PHASE, COLD_PHASE, DELETE_PHASE);
static final List<String> ORDERED_VALID_HOT_ACTIONS = Arrays.asList(SetPriorityAction.NAME, UnfollowAction.NAME, RolloverAction.NAME,
ForceMergeAction.NAME);
static final List<String> ORDERED_VALID_WARM_ACTIONS = Arrays.asList(SetPriorityAction.NAME, UnfollowAction.NAME, ReadOnlyAction.NAME,
AllocateAction.NAME, ShrinkAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME);
static final List<String> ORDERED_VALID_COLD_ACTIONS = Arrays.asList(SetPriorityAction.NAME, UnfollowAction.NAME, AllocateAction.NAME,
@ -45,10 +50,10 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
private static Map<String, Set<String>> ALLOWED_ACTIONS = new HashMap<>();
static {
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put("hot", VALID_HOT_ACTIONS);
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put("warm", VALID_WARM_ACTIONS);
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put("cold", VALID_COLD_ACTIONS);
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put("delete", VALID_DELETE_ACTIONS);
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put(HOT_PHASE, VALID_HOT_ACTIONS);
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put(WARM_PHASE, VALID_WARM_ACTIONS);
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put(COLD_PHASE, VALID_COLD_ACTIONS);
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put(DELETE_PHASE, VALID_DELETE_ACTIONS);
}
private TimeseriesLifecycleType() {
@ -126,16 +131,16 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
public List<LifecycleAction> getOrderedActions(Phase phase) {
Map<String, LifecycleAction> actions = phase.getActions();
switch (phase.getName()) {
case "hot":
case HOT_PHASE:
return ORDERED_VALID_HOT_ACTIONS.stream().map(a -> actions.getOrDefault(a, null))
.filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
case "warm":
case WARM_PHASE:
return ORDERED_VALID_WARM_ACTIONS.stream() .map(a -> actions.getOrDefault(a, null))
.filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
case "cold":
case COLD_PHASE:
return ORDERED_VALID_COLD_ACTIONS.stream().map(a -> actions.getOrDefault(a, null))
.filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
case "delete":
case DELETE_PHASE:
return ORDERED_VALID_DELETE_ACTIONS.stream().map(a -> actions.getOrDefault(a, null))
.filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
default:
@ -147,16 +152,16 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
public String getNextActionName(String currentActionName, Phase phase) {
List<String> orderedActionNames;
switch (phase.getName()) {
case "hot":
case HOT_PHASE:
orderedActionNames = ORDERED_VALID_HOT_ACTIONS;
break;
case "warm":
case WARM_PHASE:
orderedActionNames = ORDERED_VALID_WARM_ACTIONS;
break;
case "cold":
case COLD_PHASE:
orderedActionNames = ORDERED_VALID_COLD_ACTIONS;
break;
case "delete":
case DELETE_PHASE:
orderedActionNames = ORDERED_VALID_DELETE_ACTIONS;
break;
default:
@ -195,5 +200,19 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
}
});
});
// Check for forcemerge in 'hot' without a rollover action
if (phases.stream()
// Is there a hot phase
.filter(phase -> HOT_PHASE.equals(phase.getName()))
// That contains the 'forcemerge' action
.filter(phase -> phase.getActions().containsKey(ForceMergeAction.NAME))
// But does *not* contain the 'rollover' action?
.anyMatch(phase -> phase.getActions().containsKey(RolloverAction.NAME) == false)) {
// If there is, throw an exception
throw new IllegalArgumentException("the [" + ForceMergeAction.NAME +
"] action may not be used in the [" + HOT_PHASE +
"] phase without an accompanying [" + RolloverAction.NAME + "] action");
}
}
}

View File

@ -190,6 +190,12 @@ public class LifecyclePolicyTests extends AbstractSerializingTestCase<LifecycleP
TimeValue after = TimeValue.parseTimeValue(randomTimeValue(0, 1000000000, "s", "m", "h", "d"), "test_after");
Map<String, LifecycleAction> actions = new HashMap<>();
List<String> actionNames = randomSubsetOf(validActions.apply(phase));
// If the hot phase contains a forcemerge, also make sure to add a rollover, or else the policy will not validate
if (phase.equals(TimeseriesLifecycleType.HOT_PHASE) && actionNames.contains(ForceMergeAction.NAME)) {
actionNames.add(RolloverAction.NAME);
}
for (String action : actionNames) {
actions.put(action, randomAction.apply(action));
}

View File

@ -10,11 +10,13 @@ import org.elasticsearch.common.unit.TimeValue;
import org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
import java.util.function.Function;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
@ -27,6 +29,7 @@ import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.TimeseriesLifecycleType.VALID_DEL
import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.TimeseriesLifecycleType.VALID_HOT_ACTIONS;
import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.TimeseriesLifecycleType.VALID_PHASES;
import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.TimeseriesLifecycleType.VALID_WARM_ACTIONS;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.containsString;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
public class TimeseriesLifecycleTypeTests extends ESTestCase {
@ -64,7 +67,7 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleTypeTests extends ESTestCase {
Map<String, LifecycleAction> actions = VALID_HOT_ACTIONS
.stream().map(this::getTestAction).collect(Collectors.toMap(LifecycleAction::getWriteableName, Function.identity()));
if (randomBoolean()) {
invalidAction = getTestAction(randomFrom("allocate", "forcemerge", "delete", "shrink", "freeze"));
invalidAction = getTestAction(randomFrom("allocate", "delete", "shrink", "freeze"));
actions.put(invalidAction.getWriteableName(), invalidAction);
}
Map<String, Phase> hotPhase = Collections.singletonMap("hot",
@ -78,6 +81,22 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleTypeTests extends ESTestCase {
} else {
TimeseriesLifecycleType.INSTANCE.validate(hotPhase.values());
}
{
final Consumer<Collection<String>> validateHotActions = hotActions -> {
final Map<String, LifecycleAction> hotActionMap = hotActions.stream()
.map(this::getTestAction)
.collect(Collectors.toMap(LifecycleAction::getWriteableName, Function.identity()));
TimeseriesLifecycleType.INSTANCE.validate(Collections.singleton(new Phase("hot", TimeValue.ZERO, hotActionMap)));
};
validateHotActions.accept(Arrays.asList(RolloverAction.NAME));
validateHotActions.accept(Arrays.asList(RolloverAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME));
IllegalArgumentException e = expectThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class,
() -> validateHotActions.accept(Arrays.asList(ForceMergeAction.NAME)));
assertThat(e.getMessage(),
containsString("the [forcemerge] action may not be used in the [hot] phase without an accompanying [rollover] action"));
}
}
public void testValidateWarmPhase() {
@ -340,11 +359,12 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleTypeTests extends ESTestCase {
assertNextActionName("hot", RolloverAction.NAME, null, new String[] {});
assertNextActionName("hot", RolloverAction.NAME, null, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
assertNextActionName("hot", RolloverAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME, RolloverAction.NAME);
assertNextActionName("hot", ForceMergeAction.NAME, null, RolloverAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME);
assertInvalidAction("hot", "foo", new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
assertInvalidAction("hot", AllocateAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
assertInvalidAction("hot", DeleteAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
assertInvalidAction("hot", ForceMergeAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
assertInvalidAction("hot", ReadOnlyAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
assertInvalidAction("hot", ShrinkAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });

View File

@ -216,3 +216,25 @@ setup:
catch: missing
ilm.get_lifecycle:
policy: "my_timeseries_lifecycle"
---
"Test Invalid Policy":
- do:
catch: bad_request
ilm.put_lifecycle:
policy: "my_invalid_lifecycle"
body: |
{
"policy": {
"phases": {
"hot": {
"min_age": "0s",
"actions": {
"forcemerge": {
"max_num_segments": 1
}
}
}
}
}
}