[7.x] Allow forcemerge in the hot phase for ILM policies (#520… (#52083)
* Allow forcemerge in the hot phase for ILM policies This commit changes the `forcemerge` action to also be allowed in the `hot` phase for policies. The forcemerge will occur after a rollover, and allows users to take advantage of higher disk speeds for performing the force merge (on a separate node type, for example). On caveat with this is that a `forcemerge` in the `hot` phase *MUST* be accompanied by a `rollover` action. ILM validates policies to ensure this is the case. Resolves #43165 * Use anyMatch instead of findAny in validation * Make randomTimeseriesLifecyclePolicy single-pass
This commit is contained in:
parent
d8169e5fdc
commit
37a2e9bac6
|
@ -287,11 +287,15 @@ PUT _ilm/policy/my_policy
|
|||
[[ilm-forcemerge-action]]
|
||||
==== Force Merge
|
||||
|
||||
Phases allowed: warm.
|
||||
Phases allowed: hot, warm.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Index will be be made read-only when this action is run
|
||||
(see: <<dynamic-index-settings,index.blocks.write>>)
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: If the `forcemerge` action is used in the `hot` phase, the `rollover` action *must* be preset.
|
||||
ILM validates this predicate and will refuse a policy with a forcemerge in the hot phase without a
|
||||
rollover action.
|
||||
|
||||
The Force Merge Action <<indices-forcemerge,force merges>> the index into at
|
||||
most a specific number of <<indices-segments,segments>>.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -31,8 +31,13 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
|
|||
public static final TimeseriesLifecycleType INSTANCE = new TimeseriesLifecycleType();
|
||||
|
||||
public static final String TYPE = "timeseries";
|
||||
static final List<String> VALID_PHASES = Arrays.asList("hot", "warm", "cold", "delete");
|
||||
static final List<String> ORDERED_VALID_HOT_ACTIONS = Arrays.asList(SetPriorityAction.NAME, UnfollowAction.NAME, RolloverAction.NAME);
|
||||
static final String HOT_PHASE = "hot";
|
||||
static final String WARM_PHASE = "warm";
|
||||
static final String COLD_PHASE = "cold";
|
||||
static final String DELETE_PHASE = "delete";
|
||||
static final List<String> VALID_PHASES = Arrays.asList(HOT_PHASE, WARM_PHASE, COLD_PHASE, DELETE_PHASE);
|
||||
static final List<String> ORDERED_VALID_HOT_ACTIONS = Arrays.asList(SetPriorityAction.NAME, UnfollowAction.NAME, RolloverAction.NAME,
|
||||
ForceMergeAction.NAME);
|
||||
static final List<String> ORDERED_VALID_WARM_ACTIONS = Arrays.asList(SetPriorityAction.NAME, UnfollowAction.NAME, ReadOnlyAction.NAME,
|
||||
AllocateAction.NAME, ShrinkAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME);
|
||||
static final List<String> ORDERED_VALID_COLD_ACTIONS = Arrays.asList(SetPriorityAction.NAME, UnfollowAction.NAME, AllocateAction.NAME,
|
||||
|
@ -45,10 +50,10 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
|
|||
private static Map<String, Set<String>> ALLOWED_ACTIONS = new HashMap<>();
|
||||
|
||||
static {
|
||||
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put("hot", VALID_HOT_ACTIONS);
|
||||
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put("warm", VALID_WARM_ACTIONS);
|
||||
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put("cold", VALID_COLD_ACTIONS);
|
||||
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put("delete", VALID_DELETE_ACTIONS);
|
||||
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put(HOT_PHASE, VALID_HOT_ACTIONS);
|
||||
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put(WARM_PHASE, VALID_WARM_ACTIONS);
|
||||
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put(COLD_PHASE, VALID_COLD_ACTIONS);
|
||||
ALLOWED_ACTIONS.put(DELETE_PHASE, VALID_DELETE_ACTIONS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private TimeseriesLifecycleType() {
|
||||
|
@ -126,16 +131,16 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
|
|||
public List<LifecycleAction> getOrderedActions(Phase phase) {
|
||||
Map<String, LifecycleAction> actions = phase.getActions();
|
||||
switch (phase.getName()) {
|
||||
case "hot":
|
||||
case HOT_PHASE:
|
||||
return ORDERED_VALID_HOT_ACTIONS.stream().map(a -> actions.getOrDefault(a, null))
|
||||
.filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
|
||||
case "warm":
|
||||
case WARM_PHASE:
|
||||
return ORDERED_VALID_WARM_ACTIONS.stream() .map(a -> actions.getOrDefault(a, null))
|
||||
.filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
|
||||
case "cold":
|
||||
case COLD_PHASE:
|
||||
return ORDERED_VALID_COLD_ACTIONS.stream().map(a -> actions.getOrDefault(a, null))
|
||||
.filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
|
||||
case "delete":
|
||||
case DELETE_PHASE:
|
||||
return ORDERED_VALID_DELETE_ACTIONS.stream().map(a -> actions.getOrDefault(a, null))
|
||||
.filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
@ -147,16 +152,16 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
|
|||
public String getNextActionName(String currentActionName, Phase phase) {
|
||||
List<String> orderedActionNames;
|
||||
switch (phase.getName()) {
|
||||
case "hot":
|
||||
case HOT_PHASE:
|
||||
orderedActionNames = ORDERED_VALID_HOT_ACTIONS;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case "warm":
|
||||
case WARM_PHASE:
|
||||
orderedActionNames = ORDERED_VALID_WARM_ACTIONS;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case "cold":
|
||||
case COLD_PHASE:
|
||||
orderedActionNames = ORDERED_VALID_COLD_ACTIONS;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case "delete":
|
||||
case DELETE_PHASE:
|
||||
orderedActionNames = ORDERED_VALID_DELETE_ACTIONS;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
@ -195,5 +200,19 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleType implements LifecycleType {
|
|||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for forcemerge in 'hot' without a rollover action
|
||||
if (phases.stream()
|
||||
// Is there a hot phase
|
||||
.filter(phase -> HOT_PHASE.equals(phase.getName()))
|
||||
// That contains the 'forcemerge' action
|
||||
.filter(phase -> phase.getActions().containsKey(ForceMergeAction.NAME))
|
||||
// But does *not* contain the 'rollover' action?
|
||||
.anyMatch(phase -> phase.getActions().containsKey(RolloverAction.NAME) == false)) {
|
||||
// If there is, throw an exception
|
||||
throw new IllegalArgumentException("the [" + ForceMergeAction.NAME +
|
||||
"] action may not be used in the [" + HOT_PHASE +
|
||||
"] phase without an accompanying [" + RolloverAction.NAME + "] action");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -190,6 +190,12 @@ public class LifecyclePolicyTests extends AbstractSerializingTestCase<LifecycleP
|
|||
TimeValue after = TimeValue.parseTimeValue(randomTimeValue(0, 1000000000, "s", "m", "h", "d"), "test_after");
|
||||
Map<String, LifecycleAction> actions = new HashMap<>();
|
||||
List<String> actionNames = randomSubsetOf(validActions.apply(phase));
|
||||
|
||||
// If the hot phase contains a forcemerge, also make sure to add a rollover, or else the policy will not validate
|
||||
if (phase.equals(TimeseriesLifecycleType.HOT_PHASE) && actionNames.contains(ForceMergeAction.NAME)) {
|
||||
actionNames.add(RolloverAction.NAME);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (String action : actionNames) {
|
||||
actions.put(action, randomAction.apply(action));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -10,11 +10,13 @@ import org.elasticsearch.common.unit.TimeValue;
|
|||
import org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.Arrays;
|
||||
import java.util.Collection;
|
||||
import java.util.Collections;
|
||||
import java.util.HashMap;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.Map;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Consumer;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Function;
|
||||
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -27,6 +29,7 @@ import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.TimeseriesLifecycleType.VALID_DEL
|
|||
import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.TimeseriesLifecycleType.VALID_HOT_ACTIONS;
|
||||
import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.TimeseriesLifecycleType.VALID_PHASES;
|
||||
import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.TimeseriesLifecycleType.VALID_WARM_ACTIONS;
|
||||
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.containsString;
|
||||
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
|
||||
|
||||
public class TimeseriesLifecycleTypeTests extends ESTestCase {
|
||||
|
@ -64,7 +67,7 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleTypeTests extends ESTestCase {
|
|||
Map<String, LifecycleAction> actions = VALID_HOT_ACTIONS
|
||||
.stream().map(this::getTestAction).collect(Collectors.toMap(LifecycleAction::getWriteableName, Function.identity()));
|
||||
if (randomBoolean()) {
|
||||
invalidAction = getTestAction(randomFrom("allocate", "forcemerge", "delete", "shrink", "freeze"));
|
||||
invalidAction = getTestAction(randomFrom("allocate", "delete", "shrink", "freeze"));
|
||||
actions.put(invalidAction.getWriteableName(), invalidAction);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Map<String, Phase> hotPhase = Collections.singletonMap("hot",
|
||||
|
@ -78,6 +81,22 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleTypeTests extends ESTestCase {
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
TimeseriesLifecycleType.INSTANCE.validate(hotPhase.values());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
final Consumer<Collection<String>> validateHotActions = hotActions -> {
|
||||
final Map<String, LifecycleAction> hotActionMap = hotActions.stream()
|
||||
.map(this::getTestAction)
|
||||
.collect(Collectors.toMap(LifecycleAction::getWriteableName, Function.identity()));
|
||||
TimeseriesLifecycleType.INSTANCE.validate(Collections.singleton(new Phase("hot", TimeValue.ZERO, hotActionMap)));
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
validateHotActions.accept(Arrays.asList(RolloverAction.NAME));
|
||||
validateHotActions.accept(Arrays.asList(RolloverAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME));
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException e = expectThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> validateHotActions.accept(Arrays.asList(ForceMergeAction.NAME)));
|
||||
assertThat(e.getMessage(),
|
||||
containsString("the [forcemerge] action may not be used in the [hot] phase without an accompanying [rollover] action"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testValidateWarmPhase() {
|
||||
|
@ -340,11 +359,12 @@ public class TimeseriesLifecycleTypeTests extends ESTestCase {
|
|||
|
||||
assertNextActionName("hot", RolloverAction.NAME, null, new String[] {});
|
||||
assertNextActionName("hot", RolloverAction.NAME, null, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
|
||||
assertNextActionName("hot", RolloverAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME, RolloverAction.NAME);
|
||||
assertNextActionName("hot", ForceMergeAction.NAME, null, RolloverAction.NAME, ForceMergeAction.NAME);
|
||||
|
||||
assertInvalidAction("hot", "foo", new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
|
||||
assertInvalidAction("hot", AllocateAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
|
||||
assertInvalidAction("hot", DeleteAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
|
||||
assertInvalidAction("hot", ForceMergeAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
|
||||
assertInvalidAction("hot", ReadOnlyAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
|
||||
assertInvalidAction("hot", ShrinkAction.NAME, new String[] { RolloverAction.NAME });
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -216,3 +216,25 @@ setup:
|
|||
catch: missing
|
||||
ilm.get_lifecycle:
|
||||
policy: "my_timeseries_lifecycle"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
"Test Invalid Policy":
|
||||
- do:
|
||||
catch: bad_request
|
||||
ilm.put_lifecycle:
|
||||
policy: "my_invalid_lifecycle"
|
||||
body: |
|
||||
{
|
||||
"policy": {
|
||||
"phases": {
|
||||
"hot": {
|
||||
"min_age": "0s",
|
||||
"actions": {
|
||||
"forcemerge": {
|
||||
"max_num_segments": 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue