Clarify expectations of false positives/negatives (#27964)

Today this part of the documentation just says that Geo queries are not 100% 
accurate, but in fact we can be more precise about which kinds of queries see
which kinds of error. This commit clarifies this point.
This commit is contained in:
David Turner 2018-04-02 10:03:42 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 3ca9310aee
commit 40d19532bc
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ are provided:
[float]
===== Accuracy
Geo_shape does not provide 100% accuracy and depending on how it is
configured it may return some false positives or false negatives for
certain queries. To mitigate this, it is important to select an
appropriate value for the tree_levels parameter and to adjust
expectations accordingly. For example, a point may be near the border of
a particular grid cell and may thus not match a query that only matches the
Geo_shape does not provide 100% accuracy and depending on how it is configured
it may return some false positives for `INTERSECTS`, `WITHIN` and `CONTAINS`
queries, and some false negatives for `DISJOINT` queries. To mitigate this, it
is important to select an appropriate value for the tree_levels parameter and
to adjust expectations accordingly. For example, a point may be near the border
of a particular grid cell and may thus not match a query that only matches the
cell right next to it -- even though the shape is very close to the point.
[float]