From 4f99f0c6f15b5721bc25e869274e2719e5c482b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: violuke Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:18:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [DOCS] Improved readability of multi-match query docs --- docs/reference/query-dsl/queries/multi-match-query.asciidoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/reference/query-dsl/queries/multi-match-query.asciidoc b/docs/reference/query-dsl/queries/multi-match-query.asciidoc index b0d3b037a79..e0ac20ae496 100644 --- a/docs/reference/query-dsl/queries/multi-match-query.asciidoc +++ b/docs/reference/query-dsl/queries/multi-match-query.asciidoc @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ In other words, `first` and `last` would be grouped together and treated as a single field, and `first.edge` and `last.edge` would be grouped together and treated as a single field. -Having multiple groups is fine but, when combined with `operator` or +Having multiple groups is fine, but when combined with `operator` or `minimum_should_match`, it can suffer from the <> as `most_fields` or `best_fields`.