[Docs] Add note on limitation for significant_text with nested objects (#28052)
Add section to `significant_text` documentation mentioning that it currently does not support use on nested objects. Relates to #28050
This commit is contained in:
parent
5e3ba8a88d
commit
556d77c9ad
|
@ -334,6 +334,12 @@ Clients can always take the heavily-trimmed set of results from a `significant_t
|
||||||
make a subsequent follow-up query using a `terms` aggregation with an `include` clause and child
|
make a subsequent follow-up query using a `terms` aggregation with an `include` clause and child
|
||||||
aggregations to perform further analysis of selected keywords in a more efficient fashion.
|
aggregations to perform further analysis of selected keywords in a more efficient fashion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
===== No support for nested objects
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The significant_text aggregation currently also cannot be used with text fields in
|
||||||
|
nested objects, because it works with the document JSON source. This makes this
|
||||||
|
feature inefficient when matching nested docs from stored JSON given a matching
|
||||||
|
Lucene docID.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
===== Approximate counts
|
===== Approximate counts
|
||||||
The counts of how many documents contain a term provided in results are based on summing the samples returned from each shard and
|
The counts of how many documents contain a term provided in results are based on summing the samples returned from each shard and
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue