Removed an unecessary TODO for snapshot file restoration and instead
added comments explaining what happens during the restore process.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3fe42beb64
commit
5fac32e699
|
@ -1638,8 +1638,13 @@ public abstract class BlobStoreRepository extends AbstractLifecycleComponent imp
|
|||
stream = new RateLimitingInputStream(partSliceStream, restoreRateLimiter, restoreRateLimitingTimeInNanos::inc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: why does the target file sometimes already exist? Simon says: I think, this can happen if you fail a shard and
|
||||
// it's not cleaned up yet, the restore process tries to reuse files
|
||||
// A restore could possibly overwrite existing segment files due to any number of reasons,
|
||||
// for example if the primary was snapshotted and then the replica was promoted to primary
|
||||
// with different segment files. In this case, the goal of the restore is to forget about
|
||||
// what is currently in the index and just restore the state to whatever is in the snapshot.
|
||||
// Hence, we are deleting files here if they already exist before writing to them. A better
|
||||
// long term solution would be to use recovery for restoring, so we have more robust restoring
|
||||
// of files (copying to temporary files first and then moving them over).
|
||||
IOUtils.deleteFilesIgnoringExceptions(store.directory(), fileInfo.physicalName());
|
||||
|
||||
try (final IndexOutput indexOutput = store.createVerifyingOutput(fileInfo.physicalName(), fileInfo.metadata(), IOContext.DEFAULT)) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue