Fix testRefreshingMultipleTimesWithinWindowSucceeds (#39701)

Previously all the threads were writing the received tokens to a
HashSet. In cases with many threads, sometimes (1 every ~25 tests)
calling size() on the HashSet returned 2 even though it seemed to
contain only one String and there was no evidence from logging that
threadSecurityClient.refreshToken() ever returned a different
access or refresh token.

This commit changes the test to use a ConcurrentHashMap instead,
checking that we only received one pair of access token/refresh token
eventually. It also adds a check so that we won't take into consideration
tokens that are returned after 30s, hence not in the concurrent refresh
time window.
This commit is contained in:
Ioannis Kakavas 2019-03-07 12:59:23 +02:00 committed by Ioannis Kakavas
parent 95bed81198
commit 6c19d872a0
1 changed files with 14 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -40,18 +40,18 @@ import org.elasticsearch.xpack.security.support.SecurityIndexManager;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import java.time.Clock;
import java.time.Instant;
import java.time.temporal.ChronoUnit;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
import static org.elasticsearch.index.mapper.MapperService.SINGLE_MAPPING_NAME;
import static org.elasticsearch.test.hamcrest.ElasticsearchAssertions.assertNoTimeout;
@ -391,12 +391,12 @@ public class TokenAuthIntegTests extends SecurityIntegTestCase {
}
public void testRefreshingMultipleTimesWithinWindowSucceeds() throws Exception {
final Clock clock = Clock.systemUTC();
Client client = client().filterWithHeader(Collections.singletonMap("Authorization",
UsernamePasswordToken.basicAuthHeaderValue(SecuritySettingsSource.TEST_USER_NAME,
SecuritySettingsSourceField.TEST_PASSWORD_SECURE_STRING)));
SecurityClient securityClient = new SecurityClient(client);
Set<String> refreshTokens = new HashSet<>();
Set<String> accessTokens = new HashSet<>();
final List<String> tokens = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>());
CreateTokenResponse createTokenResponse = securityClient.prepareCreateToken()
.setGrantType("password")
.setUsername(SecuritySettingsSource.TEST_USER_NAME)
@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ public class TokenAuthIntegTests extends SecurityIntegTestCase {
final CountDownLatch readyLatch = new CountDownLatch(numberOfThreads + 1);
final CountDownLatch completedLatch = new CountDownLatch(numberOfThreads);
AtomicBoolean failed = new AtomicBoolean();
final Instant t1 = clock.instant();
for (int i = 0; i < numberOfThreads; i++) {
threads.add(new Thread(() -> {
// Each thread gets its own client so that more than one nodes will be hit
@ -427,8 +428,13 @@ public class TokenAuthIntegTests extends SecurityIntegTestCase {
return;
}
threadSecurityClient.refreshToken(refreshRequest, ActionListener.wrap(result -> {
accessTokens.add(result.getTokenString());
refreshTokens.add(result.getRefreshToken());
final Instant t2 = clock.instant();
if (t1.plusSeconds(30L).isBefore(t2)){
logger.warn("Tokens [{}], [{}] were received more than 30 seconds after the request, not checking them",
result.getTokenString(), result.getRefreshToken());
} else {
tokens.add(result.getTokenString() + result.getRefreshToken());
}
logger.info("received access token [{}] and refresh token [{}]", result.getTokenString(), result.getRefreshToken());
completedLatch.countDown();
}, e -> {
@ -448,8 +454,8 @@ public class TokenAuthIntegTests extends SecurityIntegTestCase {
}
completedLatch.await();
assertThat(failed.get(), equalTo(false));
assertThat(accessTokens.size(), equalTo(1));
assertThat(refreshTokens.size(), equalTo(1));
// Assert that we only ever got one access_token/refresh_token pair
assertThat(tokens.stream().distinct().collect(Collectors.toList()).size(), equalTo(1));
}
public void testRefreshAsDifferentUser() {