SQL: Fix incorrect HAVING equality (#31820)
Fix bug that causes `HAVING a = b` to be translated ad-litteram in Painless which uses `==` for equality checks not `=`. Close #31796
This commit is contained in:
parent
cce7dc20ad
commit
89cb0872cf
|
@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ public class Equals extends BinaryComparison {
|
||||||
return new Equals(location(), newLeft, newRight);
|
return new Equals(location(), newLeft, newRight);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Override
|
||||||
public Object fold() {
|
public Object fold() {
|
||||||
return Objects.equals(left().fold(), right().fold());
|
return Objects.equals(left().fold(), right().fold());
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -38,6 +39,6 @@ public class Equals extends BinaryComparison {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@Override
|
@Override
|
||||||
public String symbol() {
|
public String symbol() {
|
||||||
return "=";
|
return "==";
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ public class CliExplainIT extends CliIntegrationTestCase {
|
||||||
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith("----------"));
|
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith("----------"));
|
||||||
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith("With[{}]"));
|
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith("With[{}]"));
|
||||||
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith("\\_Project[[?*]]"));
|
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith("\\_Project[[?*]]"));
|
||||||
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith(" \\_Filter[?i = 2]"));
|
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith(" \\_Filter[?i == 2]"));
|
||||||
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith(" \\_UnresolvedRelation[[][index=test],null,Unknown index [test]]"));
|
assertThat(readLine(), startsWith(" \\_UnresolvedRelation[[][index=test],null,Unknown index [test]]"));
|
||||||
assertEquals("", readLine());
|
assertEquals("", readLine());
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT hire_date) AS count FROM test_emp;
|
||||||
// Conditional COUNT
|
// Conditional COUNT
|
||||||
aggCountAndHaving
|
aggCountAndHaving
|
||||||
SELECT gender g, COUNT(*) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING COUNT(*) > 10 ORDER BY gender;
|
SELECT gender g, COUNT(*) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING COUNT(*) > 10 ORDER BY gender;
|
||||||
|
aggCountAndHavingEquality
|
||||||
|
SELECT gender g, COUNT(*) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING COUNT(*) = 10 ORDER BY gender;
|
||||||
aggCountOnColumnAndHaving
|
aggCountOnColumnAndHaving
|
||||||
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING COUNT(gender) > 10 ORDER BY gender;
|
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING COUNT(gender) > 10 ORDER BY gender;
|
||||||
// NOT supported yet since Having introduces a new agg
|
// NOT supported yet since Having introduces a new agg
|
||||||
|
@ -91,6 +93,8 @@ aggCountOnColumnAndHavingOnAlias
|
||||||
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING c > 10 ORDER BY gender;
|
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING c > 10 ORDER BY gender;
|
||||||
aggCountOnColumnAndMultipleHaving
|
aggCountOnColumnAndMultipleHaving
|
||||||
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING c > 10 AND c < 70 ORDER BY gender ;
|
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING c > 10 AND c < 70 ORDER BY gender ;
|
||||||
|
aggCountOnColumnAndMultipleHavingEquals
|
||||||
|
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING c > 10 AND c = 63 ORDER BY gender ;
|
||||||
aggCountOnColumnAndMultipleHavingWithLimit
|
aggCountOnColumnAndMultipleHavingWithLimit
|
||||||
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING c > 10 AND c < 70 ORDER BY gender LIMIT 1;
|
SELECT gender g, COUNT(gender) c FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING c > 10 AND c < 70 ORDER BY gender LIMIT 1;
|
||||||
aggCountOnColumnAndHavingBetween
|
aggCountOnColumnAndHavingBetween
|
||||||
|
@ -145,6 +149,7 @@ SELECT gender g, MIN(emp_no) m FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING m BETWEEN 10 AN
|
||||||
aggMinWithMultipleHavingOnAliasAndFunction
|
aggMinWithMultipleHavingOnAliasAndFunction
|
||||||
SELECT gender g, MIN(emp_no) m FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING m > 10 AND MIN(emp_no) < 99999 ORDER BY gender;
|
SELECT gender g, MIN(emp_no) m FROM "test_emp" GROUP BY g HAVING m > 10 AND MIN(emp_no) < 99999 ORDER BY gender;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// MAX
|
// MAX
|
||||||
aggMaxImplicit
|
aggMaxImplicit
|
||||||
// tag::max
|
// tag::max
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue