Clarify searchable snapshot cost trade-offs (#65384)
Clarify that searchable snapshots only result in cost savings for less frequently accessed data and that the savings do not apply to the entire cluster.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b4b4483e24
commit
9f35b3d402
|
@ -12,11 +12,12 @@ searching any other index, and minimizes the need to access the snapshot
|
|||
repository. Should a node fail, shards of a {search-snap} index are
|
||||
automatically recovered from the snapshot repository.
|
||||
|
||||
This can result in significant cost savings. With {search-snaps}, you may be
|
||||
able to halve your cluster size without increasing the risk of data loss or
|
||||
reducing the amount of data you can search. Because {search-snaps} rely on the
|
||||
same snapshot mechanism you use for backups, they have a minimal impact on your
|
||||
snapshot repository storage costs.
|
||||
This can result in significant cost savings for less frequently searched data.
|
||||
With {search-snaps}, you no longer need an extra index shard copy to avoid data
|
||||
loss, potentially halving the node local storage capacity necessary for
|
||||
searching that data. Because {search-snaps} rely on the same snapshot mechanism
|
||||
you use for backups, they have a minimal impact on your snapshot repository
|
||||
storage costs.
|
||||
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
[[using-searchable-snapshots]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue