Avoid overflow when computing total FS stats
When adding filesystem stats from individual filesystems, free and available can overflow. This commit guards against this by adjusting these situations to Long.MAX_VALUE. Relates #23641
This commit is contained in:
parent
23f0bf6b68
commit
b23adb6d15
|
@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ public class FsInfo implements Iterable<FsInfo.Path>, Writeable, ToXContent {
|
|||
|
||||
public void add(Path path) {
|
||||
total = FsProbe.adjustForHugeFilesystems(addLong(total, path.total));
|
||||
free = addLong(free, path.free);
|
||||
available = addLong(available, path.available);
|
||||
free = FsProbe.adjustForHugeFilesystems(addLong(free, path.free));
|
||||
available = FsProbe.adjustForHugeFilesystems(addLong(available, path.available));
|
||||
if (path.spins != null && path.spins.booleanValue()) {
|
||||
// Spinning is contagious!
|
||||
spins = Boolean.TRUE;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ import java.util.HashSet;
|
|||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.Set;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Function;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Supplier;
|
||||
|
||||
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.equalTo;
|
||||
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.greaterThan;
|
||||
|
@ -93,26 +95,64 @@ public class FsProbeTests extends ESTestCase {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testFsInfoOverflow() throws Exception {
|
||||
FsInfo.Path pathStats = new FsInfo.Path("/foo/bar", null,
|
||||
randomNonNegativeLong(), randomNonNegativeLong(), randomNonNegativeLong());
|
||||
final FsInfo.Path pathStats =
|
||||
new FsInfo.Path(
|
||||
"/foo/bar",
|
||||
null,
|
||||
randomNonNegativeLong(),
|
||||
randomNonNegativeLong(),
|
||||
randomNonNegativeLong());
|
||||
|
||||
// While not overflowing, keep adding
|
||||
FsInfo.Path pathToAdd = new FsInfo.Path("/foo/baz", null,
|
||||
randomNonNegativeLong(), randomNonNegativeLong(), randomNonNegativeLong());
|
||||
while ((pathStats.total + pathToAdd.total) > 0) {
|
||||
// Add itself as a path, to increase the total bytes until it overflows
|
||||
logger.info("--> adding {} bytes to {}, will be: {}", pathToAdd.total, pathStats.total, pathToAdd.total + pathStats.total);
|
||||
pathStats.add(pathToAdd);
|
||||
pathToAdd = new FsInfo.Path("/foo/baz", null,
|
||||
randomNonNegativeLong(), randomNonNegativeLong(), randomNonNegativeLong());
|
||||
addUntilOverflow(
|
||||
pathStats,
|
||||
p -> p.total,
|
||||
"total",
|
||||
() -> new FsInfo.Path("/foo/baz", null, randomNonNegativeLong(), 0, 0));
|
||||
|
||||
addUntilOverflow(
|
||||
pathStats,
|
||||
p -> p.free,
|
||||
"free",
|
||||
() -> new FsInfo.Path("/foo/baz", null, 0, randomNonNegativeLong(), 0));
|
||||
|
||||
addUntilOverflow(
|
||||
pathStats,
|
||||
p -> p.available,
|
||||
"available",
|
||||
() -> new FsInfo.Path("/foo/baz", null, 0, 0, randomNonNegativeLong()));
|
||||
|
||||
// even after overflowing these should not be negative
|
||||
assertThat(pathStats.total, greaterThan(0L));
|
||||
assertThat(pathStats.free, greaterThan(0L));
|
||||
assertThat(pathStats.available, greaterThan(0L));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("--> adding {} bytes to {}, will be: {}", pathToAdd.total, pathStats.total, pathToAdd.total + pathStats.total);
|
||||
assertThat(pathStats.total + pathToAdd.total, lessThan(0L));
|
||||
private void addUntilOverflow(
|
||||
final FsInfo.Path pathStats,
|
||||
final Function<FsInfo.Path, Long> getter,
|
||||
final String field,
|
||||
final Supplier<FsInfo.Path> supplier) {
|
||||
FsInfo.Path pathToAdd = supplier.get();
|
||||
while ((getter.apply(pathStats) + getter.apply(pathToAdd)) > 0) {
|
||||
// add a path to increase the total bytes until it overflows
|
||||
logger.info(
|
||||
"--> adding {} bytes to {}, {} will be: {}",
|
||||
getter.apply(pathToAdd),
|
||||
getter.apply(pathStats),
|
||||
field,
|
||||
getter.apply(pathStats) + getter.apply(pathToAdd));
|
||||
pathStats.add(pathToAdd);
|
||||
pathToAdd = supplier.get();
|
||||
}
|
||||
// this overflows
|
||||
logger.info(
|
||||
"--> adding {} bytes to {}, {} will be: {}",
|
||||
getter.apply(pathToAdd),
|
||||
getter.apply(pathStats),
|
||||
field,
|
||||
getter.apply(pathStats) + getter.apply(pathToAdd));
|
||||
assertThat(getter.apply(pathStats) + getter.apply(pathToAdd), lessThan(0L));
|
||||
pathStats.add(pathToAdd);
|
||||
|
||||
// Even after overflowing, it should not be negative
|
||||
assertThat(pathStats.total, greaterThan(0L));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testIoStats() {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue