From b9cb70198e84bf1d97182497a9760882a25d8ef0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Radu Gheorghe Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 20:32:12 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Typo in the description for include_in_all I know this is uber-minor, but I was confused by the phrase "the raw field value to be copied". I assume "is" was supposed to be instead of "to" --- docs/reference/mapping/types/core-types.asciidoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/reference/mapping/types/core-types.asciidoc b/docs/reference/mapping/types/core-types.asciidoc index e4f4715a2aa..98f16536adc 100644 --- a/docs/reference/mapping/types/core-types.asciidoc +++ b/docs/reference/mapping/types/core-types.asciidoc @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ it gets processed as a not analyzed string and is accessible under the name `nam The `include_in_all` setting is ignored on any field that is defined in the `fields` options. Setting the `include_in_all` only makes sense on -the main field, since the raw field value to copied to the `_all` field, +the main field, since the raw field value is copied to the `_all` field, the tokens aren't copied. [float]