From cdbde4a57887a5fbda4fb4f5e45c0c9c18d63531 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: fransflippo Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 12:01:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [DOCS] Reworded note about shorthand suggest syntax The existing Note about the shorthand suggest syntax was poorly worded and confusing. Please check whether the way I've phrased it now is still correct as to what the shorthand form actually does and doesn't do: the original wording did not provide me enough information to be sure. Thanks! --- .../search/suggesters/completion-suggest.asciidoc | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/reference/search/suggesters/completion-suggest.asciidoc b/docs/reference/search/suggesters/completion-suggest.asciidoc index 03fe636ad2d..dacafd017d1 100644 --- a/docs/reference/search/suggesters/completion-suggest.asciidoc +++ b/docs/reference/search/suggesters/completion-suggest.asciidoc @@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ The following parameters are supported: A positive integer, which defines a weight and allows you to rank your suggestions. This field is optional. -NOTE: Even though you are losing most of the features of the -completion suggest, you can opt in for the shortest form, which even -allows you to use inside of multi fields. But keep in mind, that you will -not be able to use several inputs, an output, payloads or weights. +NOTE: Even though you will lose most of the features of the +completion suggest, you can choose to use the following shorthand form. +Keep in mind that you will not be able to use several inputs, an output, +payloads or weights. This form does still work inside of multi fields. [source,js] --------------------------------------------------