ignore some docker craziness in scccomp environment checks
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f88a8194a
commit
f77e8a512c
|
@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ final class Seccomp {
|
|||
static final int SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW = 0x7FFF0000;
|
||||
|
||||
// some errno constants for error checking/handling
|
||||
static final int EPERM = 0x01;
|
||||
static final int EACCES = 0x0D;
|
||||
static final int EFAULT = 0x0E;
|
||||
static final int EINVAL = 0x16;
|
||||
|
@ -275,7 +276,20 @@ final class Seccomp {
|
|||
|
||||
// check that unimplemented syscalls actually return ENOSYS
|
||||
// you never know (e.g. https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=439795)
|
||||
if (linux_syscall(999) >= 0 || Native.getLastError() != ENOSYS) {
|
||||
if (linux_syscall(999) >= 0) {
|
||||
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("seccomp unavailable: your kernel is buggy and you should upgrade");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (Native.getLastError()) {
|
||||
case ENOSYS:
|
||||
break; // ok
|
||||
case EPERM:
|
||||
// NOT ok, but likely a docker container
|
||||
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
logger.debug("syscall(BOGUS) bogusly gets EPERM instead of ENOSYS");
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("seccomp unavailable: your kernel is buggy and you should upgrade");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue