parent
98dfc26fb1
commit
ff12585fea
|
@ -12,16 +12,16 @@ results to retrieve from each shard. For example, if we have 10 shards,
|
|||
the 1st shard might hold the most relevant results from 0 till 10, with
|
||||
other shards results ranking below it. For this reason, when executing a
|
||||
request, we will need to get results from 0 till 10 from all shards,
|
||||
sort them, and then return the results if we want to insure correct
|
||||
sort them, and then return the results if we want to ensure correct
|
||||
results.
|
||||
|
||||
Another question, which relates to search engine, is the fact that each
|
||||
Another question, which relates to the search engine, is the fact that each
|
||||
shard stands on its own. When a query is executed on a specific shard,
|
||||
it does not take into account term frequencies and other search engine
|
||||
information from the other shards. If we want to support accurate
|
||||
ranking, we would need to first execute the query against all shards and
|
||||
gather the relevant term frequencies, and then, based on it, execute the
|
||||
query.
|
||||
ranking, we would need to first gather the term frequencies from all
|
||||
shards to calculate global term frequencies, then execute the query on
|
||||
each shard using these globale frequencies.
|
||||
|
||||
Also, because of the need to sort the results, getting back a large
|
||||
document set, or even scrolling it, while maintaing the correct sorting
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue