This commit introduces "Application Privileges" to the X-Pack security
model.
Application Privileges are managed within Elasticsearch, and can be
tested with the _has_privileges API, but do not grant access to any
actions or resources within Elasticsearch. Their purpose is to allow
applications outside of Elasticsearch to represent and store their own
privileges model within Elasticsearch roles.
Access to manage application privileges is handled in a new way that
grants permission to specific application names only. This lays the
foundation for more OLS on cluster privileges, which is implemented by
allowing a cluster permission to inspect not just the action being
executed, but also the request to which the action is applied.
To support this, a "conditional cluster privilege" is introduced, which
is like the existing cluster privilege, except that it has a Predicate
over the request as well as over the action name.
Specifically, this adds
- GET/PUT/DELETE actions for defining application level privileges
- application privileges in role definitions
- application privileges in the has_privileges API
- changes to the cluster permission class to support checking of request
objects
- a new "global" element on role definition to provide cluster object
level security (only for manage application privileges)
- changes to `kibana_user`, `kibana_dashboard_only_user` and
`kibana_system` roles to use and manage application privileges
Closes#29820Closes#31559
This introduces a new GetRollupIndexCaps API which allows the user to retrieve rollup capabilities of a specific rollup index (or index pattern). This is distinct from the existing RollupCaps endpoint.
- Multiple jobs can be stored in multiple indices and point to a single target data index pattern (logstash-*). The existing API finds capabilities/config of all jobs matching that data index pattern.
- One rollup index can hold data from multiple jobs, targeting multiple data index patterns. This new API finds the capabilities based on the concrete rollup indices.
There is currently no way to see what user executed a watch. This commit
adds the decrypted username to each execution in the watch history, in a
new field "user".
Closes#31772
This change adds stats about forecasts, to the jobstats api as well as xpack/_usage. The following
information is collected:
_xpack/ml/anomaly_detectors/{jobid|_all}/_stats:
- total number of forecasts
- memory statistics (mean/min/max)
- runtime statistics
- record statistics
- counts by status
_xpack/usage
- collected by job status as well as overall (_all):
- total number of forecasts
- number of jobs that have at least 1 forecast
- memory, runtime, record statistics
- counts by status
Fixes#31395
This is related to #31325. There is currently information about the
get-trial-status api on the start-trial api documentation page. It also
has the incorrect route for that api. This commit removes that
information as the start-trial page properly links to a page providing
documenation about get-trial-status.
- All rollup pages should be marked as experimental instead of just
the top page
- While the job config docs state which aggregations are allowed, adding
a section which specifically details this in one place is more convenient
for the user
- Add a clarification that the DeleteJob API does not delete the rollup
data, just the rollup job.
This change adds a grok_pattern field to the GET categories API
output in ML. It's calculated using the regex and examples in the
categorization result, and applying a list of candidate Grok
patterns to the bits in between the tokens that are considered to
define the category.
This can currently be considered a prototype, as the Grok patterns
it produces are not optimal. However, enough people have said it
would be useful for it to be worthwhile exposing it as experimental
functionality for interested parties to try out.
This is related to #30134. It modifies the start_trial action to require
an acknowledgement parameter in the rest request to actually start the
trial license. There are backwards compatibility issues as prior ES
versions did not support this parameter. To handle this, it is assumed
that a request coming from a node prior to 6.3 is acknowledged. And
attempts to write a non-acknowledged request to a prior to 6.3 node will
throw an exception.
Additionally this PR adds messages about the trial license the user is
generating.