For each remote cluster the auto follow coordinator, starts an auto
follower that checks the remote cluster state and determines whether an
index needs to be auto followed. The time since last auto follow is
reported per remote cluster and gives insight whether the auto follow
process is alive.
Relates to #33007
Originates from #35895
The following updates were made:
* Add deprecation warnings to `RestUpdateAction`, plus a test in `RestUpdateActionTests`.
* Deprecate relevant methods on the Java HLRC requests/ responses.
* Add HLRC integration tests for the typed APIs.
* Update documentation (for both the REST API and Java HLRC).
* Fix failing integration tests.
Because of an earlier PR, the REST yml tests were already updated (one version without types, and another legacy version that retains types).
These classes were introduced when Action required a RequestBuilder type.
That is no longer needed, hence we can remove `NoopBulkRequestBuilder`
and `NoopSearchRequestBuilder`.
this test was failing because of two reason
- it was creating invalid users with passwords shorter than 6 characters
- it was expecting 7 total users to be returned, but it should be 9
* add read_ilm cluster privilege
Although managing ILM policies is best done using the
"manage" cluster privilege, it is useful to have read-only
views.
* adds `read_ilm` cluster privilege for viewing policies and status
* adds Explain API to the `view_index_metadata` index privilege
* add manage_ilm privileges
The security documentation test uses
SecureRandom#getStrongInstance. This defaults to
securerandom.strongAlgorithms=NativePRNGBlocking:SUN,DRBG:SUN which
means a blocking implementation that reads from /dev/random. This means
that this test can stall if the entropy on the machine is
exhausted. Anyway, it also means that the randomness is
non-reproducible, a thing that we try to avoid in tests. This commit
switches to a boring randomness source to avoid the blocking, and to
keep the test reproducible.
* Make sure to test conversion for both typed and typeless HLRC requests.
* Update a few more statements to deprecatedAndMaybeLog.
* Make sure Rest*SearchTemplateActionTests extend RestActionTestCase.
This adds the _security/user/_privileges API to the High
Level Rest Client.
This also makes some changes to the Java model for the Role APIs
in order to better accommodate the GetPrivileges API
Redeprecates the `/_xpack/rollup` endpoints in favor of `/_rollup`.
When we cleanup the rollup in a cluster containing 6.x nodes we need to
use `/_xpack/rollup` instead of `/_rollup` because the 6.x nodes don't
know about `/_rollup`. In those cases we must ignore the deprecation
warnings that the 7.0 node will return for the end point.
Closes#36044
Adding logging to confirm the suspicion that there might be another old index
lingering around in the test cluster in cases where this test occasionally
fails.
Added helper methods to ESRestTestCase for checking warnings in mixed and current-version-only clusters.
This is supported by a new VersionSpecificWarningsHandler class with associated unit test.
Closes#36251
* This commit is part of our plan to deprecate and ultimately remove the use of _xpack in the REST APIs.
- REST API docs
- HLRC docs and doc tests
- Handle REST actions with deprecation warnings
- Changed endpoints in rest-api-spec and relevant file names
The following updates were made:
- Add a new untyped endpoint `{index}/_explain/{id}`.
- Add deprecation warnings to Rest*Action, plus tests in Rest*ActionTests.
- For each REST yml test, make sure there is one version without types, and another legacy version that retains types (called *_with_types.yml).
- Deprecate relevant methods on the Java HLRC requests/ responses.
- Update documentation (for both the REST API and Java HLRC).
For each API, the following updates were made:
- Add deprecation warnings to `Rest*Action`, plus tests in `Rest*ActionTests`.
- For each REST yml test, make sure there is one version without types, and another legacy version that retains types (called *_with_types.yml).
- Deprecate relevant methods on the Java HLRC requests/ responses.
- Update documentation (for both the REST API and Java HLRC).
This commit adds support for the index templates exist API, creating
new client-side request types for that API and the get index
templates API. Also adds links in hlrc docs to pages for supported
index template APIs
This commit creates JodaDateFormatter to replace
FormatDateTimeFormatter. It converts all uses of the old class
to DateFormatter to allow a future change to use JavaDateFormatter
when appropriate.
This allows you to plug the behavior that the LLRC uses to handle
warnings on a per request basis.
We entertained the idea of allowing you to set the warnings behavior to
strict mode on a per request basis but that wouldn't allow the high
level rest client to fail when it sees an unexpected warning.
We also entertained the idea of adding a list of "required warnings" to
the `RequestOptions` but that won't work well with failures that occur
*sometimes* like those we see in mixed clusters.
Adding a list of "allowed warnings" to the `RequestOptions` would work
for mixed clusters but it'd leave many of the assertions in our tests
weaker than we'd like.
This behavior plugging implementation allows us to make a "required
warnings" option when we need it and an "allowed warnings" behavior when
we need it.
I don't think this behavior is going to be commonly used by used outside
of the Elasticsearch build, but I expect they'll be a few commendably
paranoid folks who could use this behavior.
This commit makes FormatDateTimeFormatter and DateFormatter apis close
to each other, so that the former can be removed in favor of the latter.
This PR does not change the uses of FormatDateTimeFormatter yet, so that
that future change can be purely mechanical.
This commit gets rid of the 'NONE' and 'INFO' severity levels for
deprecation issues.
'NONE' is unused and does not make much sense as a severity level.
'INFO' can be separated into two categories: Either 1) we can
definitively tell there will be a problem with the cluster/node/index
configuration that can be resolved prior to upgrade, in which case
the issue should be a WARNING, or 2) we can't, because any issues would
be at the application level, for which the user should review the
deprecation logs and/or response headers.
ML jobs and datafeeds wrap collections into their unmodifiable
equivalents in their constructor. However, the copying builder
does not make a copy of some of those collections resulting
in wrapping those again and again. This can eventually result
to stack overflow.
This commit addressed this issue by copying the collections in
question in the copying builder constructor.
Closes#36360
* Add deprecation warnings to `Rest*TermVectorsAction`, plus tests in `Rest*TermVectorsActionTests`.
* Deprecate relevant methods on the Java HLRC requests/ responses.
* Update documentation (for both the REST API and Java HLRC).
* For each REST yml test, create one version without types, and another legacy version that retains types (called *_with_types.yml).
- GetSslCertificatesRequest need not implement toXContentObject
- getRequest() returns a new Request object
- Add tests for GetSslCertificatesResponse
- Adjust docs to the new format
This commit changes the format of the `hits.total` in the search response to be an object with
a `value` and a `relation`. The `value` indicates the number of hits that match the query and the
`relation` indicates whether the number is accurate (in which case the relation is equals to `eq`)
or a lower bound of the total (in which case it is equals to `gte`).
This change also adds a parameter called `rest_total_hits_as_int` that can be used in the
search APIs to opt out from this change (retrieve the total hits as a number in the rest response).
Note that currently all search responses are accurate (`track_total_hits: true`) or they don't contain
`hits.total` (`track_total_hits: true`). We'll add a way to get a lower bound of the total hits in a
follow up (to allow numbers to be passed to `track_total_hits`).
Relates #33028
The current response format is:
```
{
"pattern1": {
...
},
"pattern2": {
...
}
}
```
The new format is:
```
{
"patterns": [
{
"name": "pattern1",
"pattern": {
...
}
},
{
"name": "pattern2",
"pattern": {
...
}
}
]
}
```
This format is more structured and more friendly for parsing and generating specs.
This is a breaking change, but it is better to do this now while ccr
is still a beta feature than later.
Follow up from #36049
Add a more detailed section about what exceptions to expect from the blocking
calls in this class and removing the mostly redundant mentions of the
IOExceptions from each method javadoc since it doesn't give much details about
the expected exceptions anyway.
Closes#30334
AutoFollowCoordinator should take into account that after auto following
an index and while updating that a leader index has been followed, that
the auto follow pattern may have been removed via delete auto follow patterns
api.
Also fixed a bug that when a remote cluster connection has been removed,
the auto follow coordinator does not die when it tries get a remote client for
that cluster.
Closes#35480
`PreferHasAttributeNodeSelector` works like exactly like
`HasAttributeNodeSelector` but if not nodes match the attribute
then it will not filter the list of nodes.
- Add the authentication realm and lookup realm name and type in the response for the _authenticate API
- The authentication realm is set as the lookup realm too (instead of setting the lookup realm to null or empty ) when no lookup realm is used.
* [Rollup] Add more diagnostic stats to job
To help debug future performance issues, this adds the
min/max/avg/count/total latencies (in milliseconds) for search
and bulk phase. This latency is the total service time including
transfer between nodes, not just the `took` time.
It also adds the count of search/bulk failures encountered during
runtime. This information is also in the log, but a runtime counter
will help expose problems faster
* review cleanup
* Remove dead ParseFields
step times were set. The assumption was that these are always set.
Tests passed, which led me to believe this was true. There is a time
when shrunk indices have their step phase/action/step details set,
but with no time information (in the CopyExecutionStateStep).
Explain API fails for these
added validation for complete information of step details.
also changed the rendering of explain responses so null strings are not rendered
Another thing that I changed is the format of the client-side response. I found it difficult to maintain the two subtly-different objects, so I migrated the usage of long for the fields, to Long (just as it is on the server-side).
Update PutUserRequest to support password_hash (see: #35242)
This also updates the documentation to bring it in line with our more
recent approach to HLRC docs.
We didn't check that the ExplainLifecycleRequest was constructed with at least
one index before, now that we do we must also make sure the tests
mutateInstance() method used in equals/hashCode checks doesn't accidentally
create an empty index array.
Closes#35822
Previously, it was possible to initialize a request
that does not include any indices. This results in undefined
behavior when generating the URL path to send to ES. By
enforcing indices to be defined, users will be more explicit
about the intention.
This commit removes the parsing code from the PostStartBasicResponse server variant. It also makes the server response implement StatusToXContent which allows us to save a couple of lines of code in the corredponding REST action.
Relates to #35547
this adds documentation for the retry method in the
high-level-ilm-rest-client.
this PR also renames retryLifecycleStep to retryLifecyclePolicy in the index-lifecycle-client