There is a single example in the Java API docs that contains an inline
callout that is incompatible with Asciidoctor:
```
client.prepareUpdate("ttl", "doc", "1")
.setScript(new Script(
"ctx._source.gender = \"male\"" <1> , ScriptService.ScriptType.INLINE, null, null))
.get();
```
This rewrites the example to use an Asciidoctor compatible end of line
callout. It also looks nicer to me because it fits better on the page.
```
client.prepareUpdate("ttl", "doc", "1")
.setScript(new Script(
"ctx._source.gender = \"male\"", <1>
ScriptService.ScriptType.INLINE, null, null))
.get();
```
The transport client was linking to a page in maven central that didn't
have the transport client in it. This is better link and happens to be
the same link that the low and high level rest client use.
This commit changes the format of the `hits.total` in the search response to be an object with
a `value` and a `relation`. The `value` indicates the number of hits that match the query and the
`relation` indicates whether the number is accurate (in which case the relation is equals to `eq`)
or a lower bound of the total (in which case it is equals to `gte`).
This change also adds a parameter called `rest_total_hits_as_int` that can be used in the
search APIs to opt out from this change (retrieve the total hits as a number in the rest response).
Note that currently all search responses are accurate (`track_total_hits: true`) or they don't contain
`hits.total` (`track_total_hits: true`). We'll add a way to get a lower bound of the total hits in a
follow up (to allow numbers to be passed to `track_total_hits`).
Relates #33028
Bulk Request in High level rest client should be consistent with what is
possible in Rest API, therefore should support global parameters. Global
parameters are passed in URL in Rest API.
Some parameters are mandatory - index, type - and would fail validation
if not provided before before the bulk is executed.
Optional parameters - routing, pipeline.
The usage of these should be consistent across sync/async execution,
bulk processor and BulkRequestBuilder
closes#26026
* Replace custom type names with _doc in REST examples.
* Avoid using two mapping types in the percolator docs.
* Rename doc -> _doc in the main repository README.
* Also replace some custom type names in the HLRC docs.
The current docs of the put-mapping Java API is currently broken. It its current
form, it creates an index and uses the whole mapping definition given as a JSON
string as the type name. Since we didn't check the index created in the
IndicesDocumentationIT so far this went unnoticed.
This change adds test to catch this error to the documentation test, changes the
documentation so it works correctly now and adds an input validation to
PutMappingRequest#buildFromSimplifiedDef() which was used internally to reject
calls where no mapping definition is given.
Closes#31906
* Migrate scripted metric aggregation scripts to ScriptContext design #29328
* Rename new script context container class and add clarifying comments to remaining references to params._agg(s)
* Misc cleanup: make mock metric agg script inner classes static
* Move _score to an accessor rather than an arg for scripted metric agg scripts
This causes the score to be evaluated only when it's used.
* Documentation changes for params._agg -> agg
* Migration doc addition for scripted metric aggs _agg object change
* Rename "agg" Scripted Metric Aggregation script context variable to "state"
* Rename a private base class from ...Agg to ...State that I missed in my last commit
* Clean up imports after merge
In 6.3 this was moved to `Strings.toString(XContentBuilder)` as part of the
XContent extraction. This commit fixes the docs to reference the new method.
Resolves#31326
Additionally:
* Included the existing update by query java api docs in java-api docs.
(for some reason it was never included, it needed some tweaking and
then it was good to go)
* moved delete-by-query / update-by-query code samples to java file so
that we can verify that these samples at least compile.
Closes#24203
The Java API documentation for index administration currenty is wrong because
the PutMappingRequestBuilder#setSource(Object... source) an
CreateIndexRequestBuilder#addMapping(String type, Object... source) methods
delegate to methods that check that the input arguments are valid key/value
pairs. This changes the docs so the java api code examples are included from
documentation integration tests so we detect compile and runtime issues earlier.
Closes#28131
The Java API documentation for index administration currenty is wrong because
the PutMappingRequestBuilder#setSource(Object... source) and
CreateIndexRequestBuilder#addMapping(String type, Object... source) methods
delegate to methods that check that the input arguments are valid key/value
pairs:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/java-api/current/java-admin-indices.html
This changes the docs so the java api code examples are included from
documentation integration tests so we detect compile and runtime issues earlier.
Closes#28131
When using the High Level Rest Client 6.0.0-beta1, we are missing some transitive dependencies for Lucene as Lucene 7 has not been released yet. See the following `pom.xml`:
```xml
<dependency>
<groupId>org.elasticsearch.client</groupId>
<artifactId>elasticsearch-rest-client</artifactId>
<version>6.0.0-beta1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.elasticsearch.client</groupId>
<artifactId>elasticsearch-rest-high-level-client</artifactId>
<version>6.0.0-beta1</version>
</dependency>
```
It gives:
```
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project fscrawler: Could not resolve dependencies for project fr.pilato.elasticsearch.crawler:fscrawler:jar:2.4-SNAPSHOT: The following artifacts could not be resolved: org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers-common:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-backward-codecs:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-grouping:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-highlighter:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-join:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-memory:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-misc:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-queries:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-queryparser:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-sandbox:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-spatial:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-spatial-extras:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-spatial3d:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-suggest:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9: Failure to find org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers-common:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9 in https://artifacts.elastic.co/maven/ was cached in the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of elastic-download-service has elapsed or updates are forced -
```
We need to add some temporary documentation on how to add the missing repository to a gradle or maven project:
```xml
<repository>
<id>elastic-lucene-snapshots</id>
<name>Elastic Lucene Snapshots</name>
<url>http://s3.amazonaws.com/download.elasticsearch.org/lucenesnapshots/00142c9</url>
<releases><enabled>true</enabled></releases>
<snapshots><enabled>false</enabled></snapshots>
</repository>
```
This also applies to the transport client.
Closes#26106.
We publish javadocs to artifacts.elastic.co (and snapshots.elastic.co) for a while. This commit adds the link to them to the transport client, low level REST client, sniffer and high level REST client pages.
Closes#23761
Nik Everett
Mayya Sharipova
Josh Soref
Wilder Pereira
Jim Ferenczi
Christoph Büscher
Stéphane Campinas
Przemyslaw Gomulka
Julie Tibshirani
Morten Segelvik
Armin Braun
Jonathan Little
Lee Hinman
lukens
Adrien Grand
Martijn van Groningen
Jason Tedor
olcbean
David Pilato
Combalgorythm
Simon Willnauer
Catalin Ursachi
Luca Cavanna
Christoph Büscher
jiangzhuolin
hanbj
Tanguy Leroux