Adds a common base class for testing subclasses of
`InternalSingleBucketAggregation`. They are so similar they
call into question the utility of having all of these classes.
We maybe could just use `InternalSingleBucketAggregation` in
all those cases.... But for now, let's test the classes!
Relates to #22278
Today when resetting the deprecation logger after a test is torn down,
we attach a new thread context to the deprecation logger. This thread
context is never cleared and we are left with a thread context attached
to the deprecation logger for every test method that ran in the same
JVM. This commit adds a flag when resetting the deprecation logger to
not attach a new thread context when the test is being torn down.
Relates #23441
This commit sets the version on the repository-hdfs Guava dependency to
version 11.0.2. This change is made to align the version here with the
version that is defined in the POM for Hadoop 2.7.1, the version of
Hadoop that the repository-hdfs plugin is based on. See HADOOP-10101 and
HADOOP-11319 for the ridiculous history of trying to upgrade Guava past
this version in the Hadoop project.
Relates #23420
The code was testing `PointRangeQuery` however we now use the
`IndexOrDocValuesQuery` in field mappers. This makes the test generate queries
through mappers so that we test the actual queries that would be generated.
This commit changes the build hash to be the string "Unknown" when for
some reason this build hash is not available. This aligns the value with
the value we use when the hash is not available from the jar
manifest. This situation can occur when running tests from a worktree
which is not currently handled correctly by JGit, the upstream
dependency that is used to acquire the hash. This causes problems when
running tests locally because the warning header pattern expects a hash
or the string "Unknown". While the warning header pattern be changed to
allow "N/A" as well, it seemed more sensible to align the value here
with the value when the hash is not available from the jar manifest.
Relates #23421
Two tests were periodically failing. What both tests are doing is starting a relocation of a shard from one node to another. Once the
recovery process is started, the test blocks cluster state processing on the relocation target using the BlockClusterStateProcessing disruption. The test then indefinitely
waits for the relocation to complete. The stack dump shows that the relocation is stuck in the PeerRecoveryTargetService.waitForClusterState method, waiting for the relocation target node to have at least the same cluster state
version as the relocation source.
The reason why it gets stuck is the following race:
1) The test code executes a reroute command that relocates a shard from one node to another
2) Relocation target node starts applying the clusterstate with relocation info, starting the recovery process.
4) Recovery is super fast and quickly goes to the waitForClusterState method, which wants to ensure that the cluster state that is
applied on the relocation target is at least as new as the one on the relocation source. The relocation source has already applied the
cluster state but the relocation target is still in the process of applying it. The waitForClusterState method thus uses a
ClusterObserver to wait for the next cluster state. Internally this means submitting a task with priority HIGH to the cluster service.
5) Cluster state application is about to finish on the relocation target. As one of the last steps, it acks to the master which makes the
reroute command return successfully.
6) The test code then blocks cluster state processing on the relocation target by submitting a cluster state update task (with priority
IMMEDIATE) that blocks execution.
If the task that is submitted in step 6 is handled before the one in step 4 by ClusterService's thread executor, cluster state
processing becomes blocked and prevents the cluster state observer from observing the applied cluster state.
This refactors the `TransportShardBulkAction` to split it appart and make it
unit-testable, and then it also adds unit tests that use these methods.
In particular, this makes `executeBulkItemRequest` shorter and more readable
This commit fixes the date format in warning headers. There is some
confusion around whether or not RFC 1123 requires two-digit
days. However, the warning header specification very clearly relies on a
format that requires two-digit days. This commit removes the usage of
RFC 1123 date/time format from Java 8, which allows for one-digit days,
in favor of a format that forces two-digit days (it's otherwise
identical to RFC 1123 format, it is just fixed width).
Relates #23418
This commit adds a convenience method for simultaneously asserting
settings deprecations and other warnings and fixes some tests where
setting deprecations and general warnings were present.
We have many version constants in master that have already been
released, but are still marked (by naming convention) as unreleased.
This commit renames those version constants.
Previously, cluster.routing.allocation.same_shard.host was not a dynamic
setting and could not be updated after startup. This commit changes the
behavior to allow the setting to be dynamically updatable. The
documentation already states that the setting is dynamic so no
documentation changes are required.
Closes#22992
When multiple reduce phases were needed the per term error got lost in subsequent reduces in some situations:
When a previous reduce phase had calculated a non-zero error for a particular bucket we were not accounting for this error in subsequent reduce phases and instead were relying on the overall error for the agg which meant we were implicitly assuming that all shards that made up that aggregation had returned the term. This is plainly not true so we need to make sure the per term error for the aggregation is used when calcualting the error for that term in the new reduced aggregation.
Change Setting#get(Settings, Settings) to fallback only if the setting is present in the secondary.
This is needed to fix setting that relies on other settings.
Replace IT with uts.
The current implementation of RestClient.performAsync() methods can throw exceptions before the request is asynchronously executed. Since it only throws unchecked exceptions, it's easy for the user/dev to forget to catch them. Instead I think async methods should never throw exceptions and should always call the listener onFailure() method.
Martijn van Groningen
Nik Everett
Jason Tedor
Tanguy Leroux
msancho
Randall Britten
Adrien Grand
gabriel-tessier
David Pilato
Yannick Welsch
Lee Hinman
Ryan Ernst
Christoph Büscher
Ali Beyad
Jürgen van Dijk
Colin Goodheart-Smithe
Jim Ferenczi