* Allow forcemerge in the hot phase for ILM policies
This commit changes the `forcemerge` action to also be allowed in the `hot` phase for policies. The
forcemerge will occur after a rollover, and allows users to take advantage of higher disk speeds for
performing the force merge (on a separate node type, for example).
On caveat with this is that a `forcemerge` in the `hot` phase *MUST* be accompanied by a `rollover`
action. ILM validates policies to ensure this is the case.
Resolves#43165
* Use anyMatch instead of findAny in validation
* Make randomTimeseriesLifecyclePolicy single-pass
* ILM action to wait for SLM policy execution (#50454)
This change add new ILM action to wait for SLM policy execution to ensure that index has snapshot before deletion.
Closes#45067
* Fix flaky TimeSeriesLifecycleActionsIT#testWaitForSnapshot test
This change adds some randomness and cleanup step to TimeSeriesLifecycleActionsIT#testWaitForSnapshot and testWaitForSnapshotSlmExecutedBefore tests in attempt to make them stable.
Reletes to #50781
* Formatting changes
* Longer timeout
* Fix Map.of in Java8
* Unused import removed
* Refresh cached phase policy definition if possible on new policy
There are some cases when updating a policy does not change the
structure in a significant way. In these cases, we can reread the
policy definition for any indices using the updated policy.
This commit adds this refreshing to the `TransportPutLifecycleAction`
to allow this. It allows us to do things like change the configuration
values for a particular step, even when on that step (for example,
changing the rollover criteria while on the `check-rollover-ready` step).
There are more cases where the phase definition can be reread that just
the ones checked here (for example, removing an action that has already
been passed), and those will be added in subsequent work.
Relates to #48431
The warning section above the example tells that index name has to end with the digits but the example itself uses index name without digits which is confusing.
* [ILM] Add date setting to calculate index age
Add the `index.lifecycle.origination_date` to allow users to configure a
custom date that'll be used to calculate the index age for the phase
transmissions (as opposed to the default index creation date).
This could be useful for users to create an index with an "older"
origination date when indexing old data.
Relates to #42449.
* [ILM] Don't override creation date on policy init
The initial approach we took was to override the lifecycle creation date
if the `index.lifecycle.origination_date` setting was set. This had the
disadvantage of the user not being able to update the `origination_date`
anymore once set.
This commit changes the way we makes use of the
`index.lifecycle.origination_date` setting by checking its value when
we calculate the index age (ie. at "read time") and, in case it's not
set, default to the index creation date.
* Make origination date setting index scope dynamic
* Document orignation date setting in ilm settings
(cherry picked from commit d5bd2bb77ee28c1978ab6679f941d7c02e389d32)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan <andrei.dan@elastic.co>
We already have a note that the order of actions is up to ILM for each
phase, this commit puts the actions in the same order as they will be
executed.
Resolves#41729
We inject an Unfollow action before Shrink because the Shrink action
cannot be safely used on a following index, as it may not be fully
caught up with the leader index before the "original" following index is
deleted and replaced with a non-following Shrunken index. The Unfollow
action will verify that 1) the index is marked as "complete", and 2) all
operations up to this point have been replicated from the leader to the
follower before explicitly disconnecting the follower from the leader.
Injecting an Unfollow action before the Rollover action is done mainly
as a convenience: This allow users to use the same lifecycle policy on
both the leader and follower cluster without having to explictly modify
the policy to unfollow the index, while doing what we expect users to
want in most cases.
This change adds the unfollow action for CCR follower indices.
This is needed for the shrink action in case an index is a follower index.
This will give the follower index the opportunity to fully catch up with
the leader index, pause index following and unfollow the leader index.
After this the shrink action can safely perform the ilm shrink.
The unfollow action needs to be added to the hot phase and acts as
barrier for going to the next phase (warm or delete phases), so that
follower indices are being unfollowed properly before indices are expected
to go in read-only mode. This allows the force merge action to execute
its steps safely.
The unfollow action has three steps:
* `wait-for-indexing-complete` step: waits for the index in question
to get the `index.lifecycle.indexing_complete` setting be set to `true`
* `wait-for-follow-shard-tasks` step: waits for all the shard follow tasks
for the index being handled to report that the leader shard global checkpoint
is equal to the follower shard global checkpoint.
* `pause-follower-index` step: Pauses index following, necessary to unfollow
* `close-follower-index` step: Closes the index, necessary to unfollow
* `unfollow-follower-index` step: Actually unfollows the index using
the CCR Unfollow API
* `open-follower-index` step: Reopens the index now that it is a normal index
* `wait-for-yellow` step: Waits for primary shards to be allocated after
reopening the index to ensure the index is ready for the next step
In the case of the last two steps, if the index in being handled is
a regular index then the steps acts as a no-op.
Relates to #34648
Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gordon Brown <gordon.brown@elastic.co>
The "include_type_name" parameter was temporarily introduced in #37285 to facilitate
moving the default parameter setting to "false" in many places in the documentation
code snippets. Most of the places can simply be reverted without causing errors.
In this change I looked for asciidoc files that contained the
"include_type_name=true" addition when creating new indices but didn't look
likey they made use of the "_doc" type for mappings. This is mostly the case
e.g. in the analysis docs where index creating often only contains settings. I
manually corrected the use of types in some places where the docs still used an
explicit type name and not the dummy "_doc" type.
This commit adds a set_priority action to the hot, warm, and cold
phases for an ILM policy. This action sets the `index.priority`
on the managed index to allow different priorities between the
hot, warm, and cold recoveries.
This commit also includes the HLRC and documentation changes.
closes#36905
* Default include_type_name to false for get and put mappings.
* Default include_type_name to false for get field mappings.
* Add a constant for the default include_type_name value.
* Default include_type_name to false for get and put index templates.
* Default include_type_name to false for create index.
* Update create index calls in REST documentation to use include_type_name=true.
* Some minor clean-ups around the get index API.
* In REST tests, use include_type_name=true by default for index creation.
* Make sure to use 'expression == false'.
* Clarify the different IndexTemplateMetaData toXContent methods.
* Fix FullClusterRestartIT#testSnapshotRestore.
* Fix the ml_anomalies_default_mappings test.
* Fix GetFieldMappingsResponseTests and GetIndexTemplateResponseTests.
We make sure to specify include_type_name=true during xContent parsing,
so we continue to test the legacy typed responses. XContent generation
for the typeless responses is currently only covered by REST tests,
but we will be adding unit test coverage for these as we implement
each typeless API in the Java HLRC.
This commit also refactors GetMappingsResponse to follow the same appraoch
as the other mappings-related responses, where we read include_type_name
out of the xContent params, instead of creating a second toXContent method.
This gives better consistency in the response parsing code.
* Fix more REST tests.
* Improve some wording in the create index documentation.
* Add a note about types removal in the create index docs.
* Fix SmokeTestMonitoringWithSecurityIT#testHTTPExporterWithSSL.
* Make sure to mention include_type_name in the REST docs for affected APIs.
* Make sure to use 'expression == false' in FullClusterRestartIT.
* Mention include_type_name in the REST templates docs.
There are a handful of examples in the ILM documentation that could result in
rolling over indices more quickly than we might normally recommend,
contributing to over-sharding in cases where the examples are copied without
modification. This change makes some numbers bigger to try and avoid this.
This adds an example to drive home the semantics of `min_age` and explain
how actions from one phase must complete before `min_age` is even tested
closes#34020.
Lee Hinman
Przemko Robakowski
Brandon Morelli
Paweł Krześniak
Andrei Dan
James Rodewig
Deb Adair
Gordon Brown
Martijn van Groningen
Christoph Büscher
Jake Landis
Julie Tibshirani
Tal Levy
David Turner
Lisa Cawley