* Remove a checked exception, replacing it with `ParsingException`.
* Remove all Parser classes for the yaml sections, replacing them with static methods.
* Remove `ClientYamlTestFragmentParser`. Isn't used any more.
* Remove `ClientYamlTestSuiteParseContext`, replacing it with some static utility methods.
I did not rewrite the parsers using `ObjectParser` because I don't think it is worth it right now.
Introduces `XContentParser#namedObject which works a little like
`StreamInput#readNamedWriteable`: on startup components register
parsers under names and a superclass. At runtime we look up the
parser and call it to parse the object.
Right now the parsers take a context object they use to help with
the parsing but I hope to be able to eliminate the need for this
context as most what it is used for at this point is to move
around parser registries which should be replaced by this method
eventually. I make no effort to do so in this PR because it is
big enough already. This is meant to the a start down a road that
allows us to remove classes like `QueryParseContext`,
`AggregatorParsers`, `IndicesQueriesRegistry`, and
`ParseFieldRegistry`.
The goal here is to reduce the amount of plumbing required to
allow parsing pluggable things. With this you don't have to pass
registries all over the place. Instead you must pass a super
registry to fewer places and use it to wrap the reader. This is
the same tradeoff that we use for NamedWriteable and it allows
much, much simpler binary serialization. We think we want that
same thing for xcontent serialization.
The only parsing actually converted to this method is parsing
`ScoreFunctions` inside of `FunctionScoreQuery`. I chose this
because it is relatively self contained.
At one point in the past when moving out the rest tests from core to
their own subproject, we had multiple test classes which evenly split up
the tests to run. However, we simplified this and went back to a single
test runner to have better reproduceability in tests. This change
removes the remnants of that multiplexing support.
This makes it obvious that these tests are for running the client yaml
suites. Now that there are other ways of running tests using the REST
client against a running cluster we can't go on calling the shared
client yaml tests "REST tests". They are rest tests, but they aren't
**the** rest tests.
This adds a header that looks like `Location: /test/test/1` to the
response for the index/create/update API. The requirement for the header
comes from https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.htmlhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.2 claims that relative
URIs are OK. So we use an absolute path which should resolve to the
appropriate location.
Closes#19079
This makes large changes to our rest test infrastructure, allowing us
to write junit tests that test a running cluster via the rest client.
It does this by splitting ESRestTestCase into two classes:
* ESRestTestCase is the superclass of all tests that use the rest client
to interact with a running cluster.
* ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase is the superclass of all tests that use the
rest client to run the yaml tests. These tests are shared across all
official clients, thus the `ClientYamlSuite` part of the name.
Also introduced a `Processor.Parameters` class that is holder for several services processors rely on,
the IngestPlugin#getProcessors(...) method has been changed to accept `Processor.Parameters` instead
of each service seperately.
Nik Everett
Tal Levy
Ryan Ernst
Martijn van Groningen
Jason Tedor