This PR adds deprecation warnings when accessing System Indices via the REST layer. At this time, these warnings are only enabled for Snapshot builds by default, to allow projects external to Elasticsearch additional time to adjust their access patterns.
Deprecation warnings will be triggered by all REST requests which access registered System Indices, except for purpose-specific APIs which access System Indices as an implementation detail a few specific APIs which will continue to allow access to system indices by default:
- `GET _cluster/health`
- `GET {index}/_recovery`
- `GET _cluster/allocation/explain`
- `GET _cluster/state`
- `POST _cluster/reroute`
- `GET {index}/_stats`
- `GET {index}/_segments`
- `GET {index}/_shard_stores`
- `GET _cat/[indices,aliases,health,recovery,shards,segments]`
Deprecation warnings for accessing system indices take the form:
```
this request accesses system indices: [.some_system_index], but in a future major version, direct access to system indices will be prevented by default
```
This commit adds the `index.routing.allocation.prefer._tier` setting to the
`DataTierAllocationDecider`. This special-purpose allocation setting lets a user specify a
preference-based list of tiers for an index to be assigned to. For example, if the setting were set
to:
```
"index.routing.allocation.prefer._tier": "data_hot,data_warm,data_content"
```
If the cluster contains any nodes with the `data_hot` role, the decider will only allow them to be
allocated on the `data_hot` node(s). If there are no `data_hot` nodes, but there are `data_warm` and
`data_content` nodes, then the index will be allowed to be allocated on `data_warm` nodes.
This allows us to specify an index's preference for tier(s) without causing the index to be
unassigned if no nodes of a preferred tier are available.
Subsequent work will change the ILM migration to make additional use of this setting.
Relates to #60848
This commit adds the functionality to allocate newly created indices on nodes in the "hot" tier by
default when they are created.
This does not break existing behavior, as nodes with the `data` role are considered to be part of
the hot tier. Users that separate their deployments by using the `data_hot` (and `data_warm`,
`data_cold`, `data_frozen`) roles will have their data allocated on the hot tier nodes now by
default.
This change is a little more complicated than changing the default value for
`index.routing.allocation.include._tier` from null to "data_hot". Instead, this adds the ability to
have a plugin inject a setting into the builder for a newly created index. This has the benefit of
allowing this setting to be visible as part of the settings when retrieving the index, for example:
```
// Create an index
PUT /eggplant
// Get an index
GET /eggplant?flat_settings
```
Returns the default settings now of:
```json
{
"eggplant" : {
"aliases" : { },
"mappings" : { },
"settings" : {
"index.creation_date" : "1597855465598",
"index.number_of_replicas" : "1",
"index.number_of_shards" : "1",
"index.provided_name" : "eggplant",
"index.routing.allocation.include._tier" : "data_hot",
"index.uuid" : "6ySG78s9RWGystRipoBFCA",
"index.version.created" : "8000099"
}
}
}
```
After the initial setting of this setting, it can be treated like any other index level setting.
This new setting is *not* set on a new index if any of the following is true:
- The index is created with an `index.routing.allocation.include.<anything>` setting
- The index is created with an `index.routing.allocation.exclude.<anything>` setting
- The index is created with an `index.routing.allocation.require.<anything>` setting
- The index is created with a null `index.routing.allocation.include._tier` value
- The index was created from an existing source metadata (shrink, clone, split, etc)
Relates to #60848
Converting AllFieldMapper to parametrized form ended up not being run through BWC
testing, resulting in an incorrect implementation being committed. This commit fixes
the serialization, and adds unit tests as well as unmuting the BWC test that uncovered
the bug.
Fixes#60986
This commit introduces a new thread pool, `system_read`, which is
intended for use by system indices for all read operations (get and
search). The `system_read` pool is a fixed thread pool with a maximum
number of threads equal to lesser of half of the available processors
or 5. Given the combination of both get and read operations in this
thread pool, the queue size has been set to 2000. The motivation for
this change is to allow system read operations to be serviced in spite
of the number of user searches.
In order to avoid a significant performance hit due to pattern matching
on all search requests, a new metadata flag is added to mark indices
as system or non-system. Previously created system indices will have
flag added to their metadata upon upgrade to a version with this
capability.
Additionally, this change also introduces a new class, `SystemIndices`,
which encapsulates logic around system indices. Currently, the class
provides a method to check if an index is a system index and a method
to find a matching index descriptor given the name of an index.
Relates #50251
Relates #37867
Backport of #57936
These tests sometimes install a template so they can be compatible with older versions, but they run
amok of the occasionally installed "global" template which changes the default number of shards.
This commit adds `allowedWarnings` and allows these warnings to be present, but doesn't fail if they
are not (since the global template is only randomly installed).
Resolves#58807Resolves#58258
If the recovery source is on an old node (before 7.2), then the recovery
target won't have the safe commit after phase1 because the recovery
source does not send the global checkpoint in the clean_files step. And
if the recovery fails and retries, then the recovery stage won't
transition properly. If a sync_id is used in peer recovery, then the
clean_files step won't be executed to move the stage to TRANSLOG.
Relates ##7187
Closes#57708
This template was added for 7.0 for what I am guessing is a BWC issue related to deprecation
warnings. It unfortunately seems to cause failures because templates for these tests are not cleared
after the test (because these are upgrade tests).
Resolves#56363
As the datastream information is stored in the `ClusterState.Metadata` we exposed
the `Metadata` to the `AsyncWaitStep#evaluateCondition` method in order for
the steps to be able to identify when a managed index is part of a DataStream.
If a managed index is part of a DataStream the rollover target is the DataStream
name and the highest generation index is the write index (ie. the rolled index).
(cherry picked from commit 6b410dfb78f3676fce1b7401f1628c1ca6fbd45a)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan <andrei.dan@elastic.co>
I've noticed that a lot of our tests are using deprecated static methods
from the Hamcrest matchers. While this is not a big deal in any
objective sense, it seems like a small good thing to reduce compilation
warnings and be ready for a new release of the matcher library if we
need to upgrade. I've also switched a few other methods in tests that
have drop-in replacements.
This is a simple naming change PR, to fix the fact that "metadata" is a
single English word, and for too long we have not followed general
naming conventions for it. We are also not consistent about it, for
example, METADATA instead of META_DATA if we were trying to be
consistent with MetaData (although METADATA is correct when considered
in the context of "metadata"). This was a simple find and replace across
the code base, only taking a few minutes to fix this naming issue
forever.
If an index was created in version 6 and contain a date field with a joda-style pattern it should still be allowed to search and insert document into it.
Those created in 6 but date pattern starts with 8, should be considered as java style.
Today, the replica allocator uses peer recovery retention leases to
select the best-matched copies when allocating replicas of indices with
soft-deletes. We can employ this mechanism for indices without
soft-deletes because the retaining sequence number of a PRRL is the
persisted global checkpoint (plus one) of that copy. If the primary and
replica have the same retaining sequence number, then we should be able
to perform a noop recovery. The reason is that we must be retaining
translog up to the local checkpoint of the safe commit, which is at most
the global checkpoint of either copy). The only limitation is that we
might not cancel ongoing file-based recoveries with PRRLs for noop
recoveries. We can't make the translog retention policy comply with
PRRLs. We also have this problem with soft-deletes if a PRRL is about to
expire.
Relates #45136
Relates #46959
We need to make sure that the global checkpoints and peer recovery
retention leases were advanced to the max_seq_no and synced; otherwise,
we can risk expiring some peer recovery retention leases because of the
file-based recovery threshold.
Relates #49448
Fixes the muted test "testAutoExpandIndicesDuringRollingUpgrade". We can't wait in the test for
the index to be green, as we have put a filter exclusion into place that prevents all shards from
being allocated after a node rejoins. Instead we check whether the correct auto-expansion has
taken place.
Closes#50426
Follow-up to #48974 that ensures that replicas are only auto-expanded according to allocation
filtering rules once all nodes are upgraded to a version that supports this. Helps with
orchestrating cluster upgrades.
Follow-up to #48974 that ensures that replicas are only auto-expanded according to allocation
filtering rules once all nodes are upgraded to a version that supports this. Helps with
orchestrating cluster upgrades.
Since 7.4, we switch from translog to Lucene as the source of history
for peer recoveries. However, we reduce the likelihood of
operation-based recoveries when performing a full cluster restart from
pre-7.4 because existing copies do not have PPRL.
To remedy this issue, we fallback using translog in peer recoveries if
the recovering replica does not have a peer recovery retention lease,
and the replication group hasn't fully migrated to PRRL.
Relates #45136
This change adds a dynamic cluster setting named `indices.id_field_data.enabled`.
When set to `false` any attempt to load the fielddata for the `_id` field will fail
with an exception. The default value in this change is set to `false` in order to prevent
fielddata usage on this field for future versions but it will be set to `true` when backporting
to 7x. When the setting is set to true (manually or by default in 7x) the loading will also issue
a deprecation warning since we want to disallow fielddata entirely when https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/26472
is implemented.
Closes#43599
* Bwc testclusters all (#46265)
Convert all bwc projects to testclusters
* Fix bwc versions config
* WIP fix rolling upgrade
* Fix bwc tests on old versions
* Fix rolling upgrade
Changes auto-id index requests to use optype CREATE, making it compliant with our docs.
This will also make these auto-id index requests compatible with the new "create-doc" index
privilege (which is based on the optype), the default optype is changed to create, just as it is
already documented.
Bulk requests currently do not allow adding "create" actions with auto-generated IDs.
This commit allows using the optype CREATE for append-only indexing operations. This is
mainly the user facing aspect of it.
We hit a bug where we can't partially update documents created in a
mixed cluster between 5.x and 6.x. Although this bug does not affect
7.0 or later, we should have a good test that catches this issue.
Relates #46198
Today we recover a replica by copying operations from the primary's translog.
However we also retain some historical operations in the index itself, as long
as soft-deletes are enabled. This commit adjusts peer recovery to use the
operations in the index for recovery rather than those in the translog, and
ensures that the replication group retains enough history for use in peer
recovery by means of retention leases.
Reverts #38904 and #42211
Relates #41536
Backport of #45136 to 7.x.
This change verifies and aborts recovery if source and target have the
same syncId but different sequenceId. This commit also adds an upgrade
test to ensure that we always utilize syncId.
If the relocation is throttled, the subsequent search request on the
target node (i.e., with preference _only_nodes=target_node) will fail
because some shards have not moved to that node yet. With this change,
we will wait for the relocation happens by busily checking the routing
table of the testing index on the target node.
Closes#34950
There were some test failures caused by the background retention lease sync running on a relocated
primary. This commit fixes the situation that triggered the assertion and reactivates the failing test.
Closes#40731