We have an example in `reindex`'s docs about copying from many indices
at once. It doesn't work at the moment because we only allow a single
type per index. We didn't notice it in the docs tests because those
tests didn't copy any documents. This change:
1. Adds documents to the docs tests to fully exercise the snippet.
2. Fixes the example by moving all copied documents to the same type.
3. Moves the note about id collisions and expands on it because it is
even more likely than before.
Closes#35150
Deprecates `_source_include` and `_source_exclude` url parameters
in favor of `_source_inclues` and `_source_excludes` because those
are consistent with the rest of Elasticsearch's APIs.
Relates to #22792
* Replace custom type names with _doc in REST examples.
* Avoid using two mapping types in the percolator docs.
* Rename doc -> _doc in the main repository README.
* Also replace some custom type names in the HLRC docs.
It took me quite a while of online searching and experimenting to realize the function-call asymmetry in the Add versus Remove from a list, like the "tags" list! I realize we cannot give examples for every single thing the user wants to do in Painless, but this is such a common use case (removing a tag from a single doc, or from a set of docs with Update-By-Query) that I believe it ought to be demonstrated immediately after the "add a tag" example. We have an example of removing an entire document field, but not removing one element of a list (a multi-valued field).
Also, a minor grammar fix: I have added an apostrophe to the word "its" in the accompanying text of the example just above.
Only the shards that receive the bulk request will be affected by
`refresh`. Imagine a `_bulk?refresh=wait_for` request with three
documents in it that happen to be routed to different shards in an index
with five shards. The request will only wait for those three shards to
refresh. The other two shards of that make up the index do not
participate in the `_bulk` request at all.
Relates to #31819
Folks tend to want to be able to make a single `_reindex` call to
migrate many indices. You *can* do that and we even have an example of
how to do that in the docs but it isn't always a good idea. This change
adds some advice to the docs: generally you want to make one reindex
call per index.
Closes#22920
We had been using `task_id:1` or `taskId:1` because it is parses as a
valid task identifier but the `:1` part is confusing. This replaces
those examples with `task_id` which matches the response from the list
tasks API.
Closes#28314
We already had *some* documentation of the batch nature of `reindex` and
friends but it wasn't super obvious how it interacted with the
`failures` element in the response. This adds some more documentation
the `failures` element.
The documentation for settings index.routing.allocation.enable,
index.routing.rebalance.enable and index.gc_deletes was lost in
f123a53d7258349a171e47a35f4581899d8fa776. This change reinstates it.
Some features have been deprecated since `6.0` like the `_parent` field or the
ability to have multiple types per index. This allows to remove quite some
code, which in-turn will hopefully make it easier to proceed with the removal
of types.
Elasticsearch 6.x indices do not allow multiple types index. Instead, they use "_doc" as default if created internally (Elasticsearch), or "doc" default if sent by Logstash.
The implementation maintains the order of the original requests yet this
functionality is not documented. This commit adds a note to the docs
regarding the ordering of responses to an multi-get request.
Relates #28356
Allowing `_doc` as a type will enable users to make the transition to 7.0
smoother since the index APIs will be `PUT index/_doc/id` and `POST index/_doc`.
This also moves most of the documentation to `_doc` as a type name.
Closes#27750Closes#27751
Stardardize underscore requirements in parameters across different type of
requests:
_index, _type, _source, _id keep their underscores
params like version and retry_on_conflict will be without underscores
Throw an error if older versions of parameters are used
BulkRequest, MultiGetRequest, TermVectorcRequest, MoreLikeThisQuery
were changed
Closes#26886
The shard preference _primary, _replica and its variants were useful
for the asynchronous replication. However, with the current impl, they
are no longer useful and should be removed.
Closes#26335
Removing several occurrences of this typo in the docs and javadocs, seems to be
a common mistake. Corrections turn up once in a while in PRs, better to correct
some of this in one sweep.
All of the snippets in our docs marked with `// TESTRESPONSE` are
checked against the response from Elasticsearch but, due to the
way they are implemented they are actually parsed as YAML instead
of JSON. Luckilly, all valid JSON is valid YAML! Unfurtunately
that means that invalid JSON has snuck into the exmples!
This adds a step during the build to parse them as JSON and fail
the build if they don't parse.
But no! It isn't quite that simple. The displayed text of some of
these responses looks like:
```
{
...
"aggregations": {
"range": {
"buckets": [
{
"to": 1.4436576E12,
"to_as_string": "10-2015",
"doc_count": 7,
"key": "*-10-2015"
},
{
"from": 1.4436576E12,
"from_as_string": "10-2015",
"doc_count": 0,
"key": "10-2015-*"
}
]
}
}
}
```
Note the `...` which isn't valid json but we like it anyway and want
it in the output. We use substitution rules to convert the `...`
into the response we expect. That yields a response that looks like:
```
{
"took": $body.took,"timed_out": false,"_shards": $body._shards,"hits": $body.hits,
"aggregations": {
"range": {
"buckets": [
{
"to": 1.4436576E12,
"to_as_string": "10-2015",
"doc_count": 7,
"key": "*-10-2015"
},
{
"from": 1.4436576E12,
"from_as_string": "10-2015",
"doc_count": 0,
"key": "10-2015-*"
}
]
}
}
}
```
That is what the tests consume but it isn't valid JSON! Oh no! We don't
want to go update all the substitution rules because that'd be huge and,
ultimately, wouldn't buy much. So we quote the `$body.took` bits before
parsing the JSON.
Note the responses that we use for the `_cat` APIs are all converted into
regexes and there is no expectation that they are valid JSON.
Closes#26233
In #26185 we made the description of `requests_per_second` sane
for reindex. This improves on the description by using some more
common vocabulary ("batch size", etc) and improving the formatting
of the example calculation so it stands out and doesn't require
scrolling.
In reindex APIs, when using the `slices` parameter to choose the number of slices, adds the option to specify `slices` as "auto" which will choose a reasonable number of slices. It uses the number of shards in the source index, up to a ceiling. If there is more than one source index, it uses the smallest number of shards among them.
This gives users an easy way to use slicing in these APIs without having to make decisions about how to configure it, as it provides a good-enough configuration for them out of the box. This may become the default behavior for these APIs in the future.
The created and found fields in index and delete responses became obsolete after the introduction of the result field in index, update and delete responses (#19566).
After deprecating the created and found fields in 5.x (#19633), now they are removed.
Fixes#19630
