Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zachary Tong f8fd4321f8 Link rare_terms docs from index page (#43882)
Docs for rare_terms were added in #35718, but neglected to
link it from the bucket index page
2019-07-03 09:32:01 -04:00
Zachary Tong ea1794832f Add RareTerms aggregation (#35718)
This adds a `rare_terms` aggregation.  It is an aggregation designed
to identify the long-tail of keywords, e.g. terms that are "rare" or
have low doc counts.

This aggregation is designed to be more memory efficient than the
alternative, which is setting a terms aggregation to size: LONG_MAX
(or worse, ordering a terms agg by count ascending, which has
unbounded error).

This aggregation works by maintaining a map of terms that have
been seen. A counter associated with each value is incremented
when we see the term again.  If the counter surpasses a predefined
threshold, the term is removed from the map and inserted into a cuckoo
filter.  If a future term is found in the cuckoo filter we assume it
was previously removed from the map and is "common".

The map keys are the "rare" terms after collection is done.
2019-07-01 10:30:02 -04:00
Tal Levy 193464d8c8
add geotile_grid ref to asciidoc (#38632) (#38639)
Co-authored-by: Yuri Astrakhan <yuriastrakhan@gmail.com>
2019-02-08 09:40:53 -08:00
Dominik Stadler d351422215 Add parent-aggregation to parent-join module (#34210)
Add `parent` aggregation, a special single bucket aggregation that joins children documents to their parent.
2018-11-08 14:13:00 +01:00
Colin Goodheart-Smithe 0edb096eb4 Adds a new auto-interval date histogram (#28993)
* Adds a new auto-interval date histogram

This change adds a new type of histogram aggregation called `auto_date_histogram` where you can specify the target number of buckets you require and it will find an appropriate interval for the returned buckets. The aggregation works by first collecting documents in buckets at second interval, when it has created more than the target number of buckets it merges these buckets into minute interval bucket and continues collecting until it reaches the target number of buckets again. It will keep merging buckets when it exceeds the target until either collection is finished or the highest interval (currently years) is reached. A similar process happens at reduce time.

This aggregation intentionally does not support min_doc_count, offest and extended_bounds to keep the already complex logic from becoming more complex. The aggregation accepts sub-aggregations but will always operate in `breadth_first` mode deferring the computation of sub-aggregations until the final buckets from the shard are known. min_doc_count is effectively hard-coded to zero meaning that we will insert empty buckets where necessary.

Closes #9572

* Adds documentation

* Added sub aggregator test

* Fixes failing docs test

* Brings branch up to date with master changes

* trying to get tests to pass again

* Fixes multiBucketConsumer accounting

* Collects more buckets than needed on shards

This gives us more options at reduce time in terms of how we do the
final merge of the buckeets to produce the final result

* Revert "Collects more buckets than needed on shards"

This reverts commit 993c782d117892af9a3c86a51921cdee630a3ac5.

* Adds ability to merge within a rounding

* Fixes nonn-timezone doc test failure

* Fix time zone tests

* iterates on tests

* Adds test case and documentation changes

Added some notes in the documentation about the intervals that can bbe
returned.

Also added a test case that utilises the merging of conseecutive buckets

* Fixes performance bug

The bug meant that getAppropriate rounding look a huge amount of time
if the range of the data was large but also sparsely populated. In
these situations the rounding would be very low so iterating through
the rounding values from the min key to the max keey look a long time
(~120 seconds in one test).

The solution is to add a rough estimate first which chooses the
rounding based just on the long values of the min and max keeys alone
but selects the rounding one lower than the one it thinks is
appropriate so the accurate method can choose the final rounding taking
into account the fact that intervals are not always fixed length.

Thee commit also adds more tests

* Changes to only do complex reduction on final reduce

* merge latest with master

* correct tests and add a new test case for 10k buckets

* refactor to perform bucket number check in innerBuild

* correctly derive bucket setting, update tests to increase bucket threshold

* fix checkstyle

* address code review comments

* add documentation for default buckets

* fix typo
2018-07-13 13:08:35 -04:00
Jim Ferenczi c4e0a84344
Mark the composite aggregation as a beta feature (#28431)
The `composite` aggregation should be marked as beta (rather than experimental) in the documentation.
2018-02-02 09:24:10 +01:00
Jim Ferenczi caea6b70fa
Add a new cluster setting to limit the total number of buckets returned by a request (#27581)
This commit adds a new dynamic cluster setting named `search.max_buckets` that can be used to limit the number of buckets created per shard or by the reduce phase. Each multi bucket aggregator can consume buckets during the final build of the aggregation at the shard level or during the reduce phase (final or not) in the coordinating node. When an aggregator consumes a bucket, a global count for the request is incremented and if this number is greater than the limit an exception is thrown (TooManyBuckets exception).
This change adds the ability for multi bucket aggregator to "consume" buckets in the global limit, the default is 10,000. It's an opt-in consumer so each multi-bucket aggregator must explicitly call the consumer when a bucket is added in the response.

Closes #27452 #26012
2017-12-06 09:15:28 +01:00
Jim Ferenczi 623367d793
Add composite aggregator (#26800)
* This change adds a module called `aggs-composite` that defines a new aggregation named `composite`.
The `composite` aggregation is a multi-buckets aggregation that creates composite buckets made of multiple sources.
The sources for each bucket can be defined as:
  * A `terms` source, values are extracted from a field or a script.
  * A `date_histogram` source, values are extracted from a date field and rounded to the provided interval.
This aggregation can be used to retrieve all buckets of a deeply nested aggregation by flattening the nested aggregation in composite buckets.
A composite buckets is composed of one value per source and is built for each document as the combinations of values in the provided sources.
For instance the following aggregation:

````
"test_agg": {
  "terms": {
    "field": "field1"
  },
  "aggs": {
    "nested_test_agg":
      "terms": {
        "field": "field2"
      }
  }
}
````
... which retrieves the top N terms for `field1` and for each top term in `field1` the top N terms for `field2`, can be replaced by a `composite` aggregation in order to retrieve **all** the combinations of `field1`, `field2` in the matching documents:

````
"composite_agg": {
  "composite": {
    "sources": [
      {
	"field1": {
          "terms": {
              "field": "field1"
            }
        }
      },
      {
	"field2": {
          "terms": {
            "field": "field2"
          }
        }
      },
    }
  }
````

The response of the aggregation looks like this:

````
"aggregations": {
  "composite_agg": {
    "buckets": [
      {
        "key": {
          "field1": "alabama",
          "field2": "almanach"
        },
        "doc_count": 100
      },
      {
        "key": {
          "field1": "alabama",
          "field2": "calendar"
        },
        "doc_count": 1
      },
      {
        "key": {
          "field1": "arizona",
          "field2": "calendar"
        },
        "doc_count": 1
      }
    ]
  }
}
````

By default this aggregation returns 10 buckets sorted in ascending order of the composite key.
Pagination can be achieved by providing `after` values, the values of the composite key to aggregate after.
For instance the following aggregation will aggregate all composite keys that sorts after `arizona, calendar`:

````
"composite_agg": {
  "composite": {
    "after": {"field1": "alabama", "field2": "calendar"},
    "size": 100,
    "sources": [
      {
	"field1": {
          "terms": {
            "field": "field1"
          }
        }
      },
      {
	"field2": {
          "terms": {
            "field": "field2"
          }
	}
      }
    }
  }
````

This aggregation is optimized for indices that set an index sorting that match the composite source definition.
For instance the aggregation above could run faster on indices that defines an index sorting like this:

````
"settings": {
  "index.sort.field": ["field1", "field2"]
}
````

In this case the `composite` aggregation can early terminate on each segment.
This aggregation also accepts multi-valued field but disables early termination for these fields even if index sorting matches the sources definition.
This is mandatory because index sorting picks only one value per document to perform the sort.
2017-11-16 15:13:36 +01:00
markharwood b7197f5e21 SignificantText aggregation - like significant_terms, but for text (#24432)
* SignificantText aggregation - like significant_terms but doesn’t require fielddata=true, recommended used with `sampler` agg to limit expense of tokenizing docs and takes optional `filter_duplicate_text`:true setting to avoid stats skew from repeated sections of text in search results.

Closes #23674
2017-05-24 13:46:43 +01:00
markharwood 87495750ff Docs fix - Added missing link to new Adjacency-matrix agg 2017-01-23 10:18:30 +00:00
ericamick 069eb72604 Update bucket.asciidoc 2016-04-22 10:54:25 -06:00
Colin Goodheart-Smithe 1aea0faa86 Aggregations Refactor: Refactor Sampler Aggregation 2015-12-21 09:35:46 +00:00
Zachary Tong e3ae1df6f0 [DOCS] Restructure Aggs documentation 2015-05-01 16:04:55 -04:00