The read-only-allow-delete block is not really under the user's control
since Elasticsearch adds/removes it automatically. This commit removes
support for it from the new API for adding blocks to indices that was
introduced in #58094.
Restoring from a snapshot (which is a particular form of recovery) does not currently take recovery throttling into account
(i.e. the `indices.recovery.max_bytes_per_sec` setting). While restores are subject to their own throttling (repository
setting `max_restore_bytes_per_sec`), this repository setting does not allow for values to be configured differently on a
per-node basis. As restores are very similar in nature to peer recoveries (streaming bytes to the node), it makes sense to
configure throttling in a single place.
The `max_restore_bytes_per_sec` setting is also changed to default to unlimited now, whereas previously it was set to
`40mb`, which is the current default of `indices.recovery.max_bytes_per_sec`). This means that no behavioral change
will be observed by clusters where the recovery and restore settings were not adapted.
Relates https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/57023
Co-authored-by: James Rodewig <james.rodewig@elastic.co>
Today the disk-based shard allocator accounts for incoming shards by
subtracting the estimated size of the incoming shard from the free space on the
node. This is an overly conservative estimate if the incoming shard has almost
finished its recovery since in that case it is already consuming most of the
disk space it needs.
This change adds to the shard stats a measure of how much larger each store is
expected to grow, computed from the ongoing recovery, and uses this to account
for the disk usage of incoming shards more accurately.
Backport of #58029 to 7.x
* Picky picky
* Missing type
Adds an explicit check to `variable_width_histogram` to stop it from
trying to collect from many buckets because it can't. I tried to make it
do so but that is more than an afternoon's project, sadly. So for now we
just disallow it.
Relates to #42035
This commit adds conditional logic to the docs to avoid including any
docs on searchable snapshots in released versions.
Rework of #58556 which was reverted.
Adds an API for putting an index block in place, which also ensures for write blocks that, once successfully returning to
the user, all shards of the index are properly accounting for the block, for example that all in-flight writes to an index have
been completed after adding the write block.
This API allows coordinating more complex workflows, where it is crucial that an index is no longer receiving writes after
the API completes, useful for example when marking an index as read-only during an upgrade in order to reindex its
documents.
* Adding create index snapshot API page.
* Condense API description.
* Remove parameter from query.
* Add POST method and remove `-name` from the snapshot variable.
* Expand description of `<snapshot>`.
* Add data streams to introduction and expand the overall description.
* Add support for data streams.
* Add support for data streams.
* Add data stream and reference for "point-in-time view".
* Add data streams.
* Change `my_backup` to `my_repository`.
* Add description of boolean options for `wait_for_completion` parameter.
* Change command --> response
* Clarify `indices` parameter description
* Update `ignore-unavailable` parameter description
* Reword example description
* Remove "index" from API name
* Incorporating review comments from James R.
* Adding a much better request + response
* Clarify `include_global_state` description
* Incorporating additional edits.
* Changing my_backup to my_repository in example.
* Update snippet test to avoid failures
* Update TESTRESPONSE snippets
* Remove errant space
* Removing the parameter per reviewer comments
Adds parsing of `status` and `memory_reestimate_bytes`
to data frame analytics `memory_usage`. When the training surpasses
the model memory limit, the status will be set to `hard_limit` and
`memory_reestimate_bytes` can be used to update the job's
limit in order to restart the job.
Backport of #58588
Introduce pipe support, in particular head and tail
(which can also be chained).
(cherry picked from commit 4521ca3367147d4d6531cf0ab975d8d705f400ea)
(cherry picked from commit d6731d659d012c96b19879d13cfc9e1eaf4745a4)
Replaces `composable index template` and `composable template` with
`index template` throughout data stream-related docs.
`Composable index template` is only used to contrast with legacy index
templates.
Removes references to partial results from the async EQL search docs.
If an EQL search does not complete during the `wait_for_completion_timeout`
timeout period, it returns no results.
Changes the titles for tokenizer pages to sentence case.
Also moves the 'Path hierarchy tokenizer examples' page within the
'Path hierarchy tokenizer' page and adds a related redirect.
We're tracking this aggregation's experimental-progress in #58573. We'd
like a little time to be able to make backwards incompatible changes to
the aggregation because we're not 100% sure about the request and
response format yet.
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
Implements a new histogram aggregation called `variable_width_histogram` which
dynamically determines bucket intervals based on document groupings. These
groups are determined by running a one-pass clustering algorithm on each shard
and then reducing each shard's clusters using an agglomerative
clustering algorithm.
This PR addresses #9572.
The shard-level clustering is done in one pass to minimize memory overhead. The
algorithm was lightly inspired by
[this paper](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1198387). It fetches
a small number of documents to sample the data and determine initial clusters.
Subsequent documents are then placed into one of these clusters, or a new one
if they are an outlier. This algorithm is described in more details in the
aggregation's docs.
At reduce time, a
[hierarchical agglomerative clustering](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchical_clustering)
algorithm inspired by [this paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00304)
continually merges the closest buckets from all shards (based on their
centroids) until the target number of buckets is reached.
The final values produced by this aggregation are approximate. Each bucket's
min value is used as its key in the histogram. Furthermore, buckets are merged
based on their centroids and not their bounds. So it is possible that adjacent
buckets will overlap after reduction. Because each bucket's key is its min,
this overlap is not shown in the final histogram. However, when such overlap
occurs, we set the key of the bucket with the larger centroid to the midpoint
between its minimum and the smaller bucket’s maximum:
`min[large] = (min[large] + max[small]) / 2`. This heuristic is expected to
increases the accuracy of the clustering.
Nodes are unable to share centroids during the shard-level clustering phase. In
the future, resolving https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/50863
would let us solve this issue.
It doesn’t make sense for this aggregation to support the `min_doc_count`
parameter, since clusters are determined dynamically. The `order` parameter is
not supported here to keep this large PR from becoming too complex.
Co-authored-by: James Dorfman <jamesdorfman@users.noreply.github.com>
debadair
Adam Locke
James Rodewig
Nik Everett
Lee Hinman
Dan Hermann
Przemysław Witek
David Turner
Yannick Welsch
Russ Cam
István Zoltán Szabó
Dimitris Athanasiou
Costin Leau
Przemyslaw Gomulka
Jason Tedor
Igor Motov