This commit creates a new Gradle plugin to provide a separate task name
and source set for running YAML based REST tests. The only project
converted to use the new plugin in this PR is distribution/archives/integ-test-zip.
For which the testing has been moved to :rest-api-spec since it makes the most
sense and it avoids a small but awkward change to the distribution plugin.
The remaining cases in modules, plugins, and x-pack will be handled in followups.
This plugin is distinctly different from the plugin introduced in #55896 since
the YAML REST tests are intended to be black box tests over HTTP. As such they
should not (by default) have access to the classpath for that which they are testing.
The YAML based REST tests will be moved to separate source sets (yamlRestTest).
The which source is the target for the test resources is dependent on if this
new plugin is applied. If it is not applied, it will default to the test source
set.
Further, this introduces a breaking change for plugin developers that
use the YAML testing framework. They will now need to either use the new source set
and matching task, or configure the rest resources to use the old "test" source set that
matches the old integTest task. (The former should be preferred).
As part of this change (which is also breaking for plugin developers) the
rest resources plugin has been removed from the build plugin and now requires
either explicit application or application via the new YAML REST test plugin.
Plugin developers should be able to fix the breaking changes to the YAML tests
by adding apply plugin: 'elasticsearch.yaml-rest-test' and moving the YAML tests
under a yamlRestTest folder (instead of test)
* Replace compile configuration usage with api (#58451)
- Use java-library instead of plugin to allow api configuration usage
- Remove explicit references to runtime configurations in dependency declarations
- Make test runtime classpath input for testing convention
- required as java library will by default not have build jar file
- jar file is now explicit input of the task and gradle will ensure its properly build
* Fix compile usages in 7.x branch
* Remove usage of deprecated testCompile configuration
* Replace testCompile usage by testImplementation
* Make testImplementation non transitive by default (as we did for testCompile)
* Update CONTRIBUTING about using testImplementation for test dependencies
* Fail on testCompile configuration usage
* Smarter copying of the rest specs and tests (#52114)
This PR addresses the unnecessary copying of the rest specs and allows
for better semantics for which specs and tests are copied. By default
the rest specs will get copied if the project applies
`elasticsearch.standalone-rest-test` or `esplugin` and the project
has rest tests or you configure the custom extension `restResources`.
This PR also removes the need for dozens of places where the x-pack
specs were copied by supporting copying of the x-pack rest specs too.
The plugin/task introduced here can also copy the rest tests to the
local project through a similar configuration.
The new plugin/task allows a user to minimize the surface area of
which rest specs are copied. Per project can be configured to include
only a subset of the specs (or tests). Configuring a project to only
copy the specs when actually needed should help with build cache hit
rates since we can better define what is actually in use.
However, project level optimizations for build cache hit rates are
not included with this PR.
Also, with this PR you can no longer use the includePackaged flag on
integTest task.
The following items are included in this PR:
* new plugin: `elasticsearch.rest-resources`
* new tasks: CopyRestApiTask and CopyRestTestsTask - performs the copy
* new extension 'restResources'
```
restResources {
restApi {
includeCore 'foo' , 'bar' //will include the core specs that start with foo and bar
includeXpack 'baz' //will include x-pack specs that start with baz
}
restTests {
includeCore 'foo', 'bar' //will include the core tests that start with foo and bar
includeXpack 'baz' //will include the x-pack tests that start with baz
}
}
```
Backport / reimplementation of #50786 on 7.x.
Opt-in `buildSrc` for automatic formatting. This required a config tweak
in order to pick up all the Java sources, and as a result more files are
now found in the Enrich plugin, that were previously missed.
I also moved the 2 Java files in `buildSrc/src/main/groovy` into the Java
directory, which required some follow-up changes.
Backport of #48849. Update `.editorconfig` to make the Java settings the
default for all files, and then apply a 2-space indent to all `*.gradle`
files. Then reformat all the files.
Prior to this change the `target_field` would always be a json array
field in the document being ingested. This to take into account that
multiple enrich documents could be inserted into the `target_field`.
However the default `max_matches` is `1`. Meaning that by default
only a single enrich document would be added to `target_field` json
array field.
This commit changes this; if `max_matches` is set to `1` then the single
document would be added as a json object to the `target_field` and
if it is configured to a higher value then the enrich documents will be
added as a json array (even if a single enrich document happens to be
enriched).
Changes the execution logic to create a new task using the execute request,
and attaches the new task to the policy runner to be updated. Also, a new
response is now returned from the execute api, which contains either the task
id of the execution, or the completed status of the run. The fields are mutually
exclusive to make it easier to discern what type of response it is.
Currently the policy config is placed directly in the json object
of the toplevel `policies` array field. For example:
```
{
"policies": [
{
"match": {
"name" : "my-policy",
"indices" : ["users"],
"match_field" : "email",
"enrich_fields" : [
"first_name",
"last_name",
"city",
"zip",
"state"
]
}
}
]
}
```
This change adds a `config` field in each policy json object:
```
{
"policies": [
{
"config": {
"match": {
"name" : "my-policy",
"indices" : ["users"],
"match_field" : "email",
"enrich_fields" : [
"first_name",
"last_name",
"city",
"zip",
"state"
]
}
}
}
]
}
```
This allows us in the future to add other information about policies
in the get policy api response.
The UI will consume this API to build an overview of all policies.
The UI may in the future include additional information about a policy
and the plan is to include that in the get policy api, so that this
information can be gathered in a single api call.
An example of the information that is likely to be added is:
* Last policy execution time
* The status of a policy (executing, executed, unexecuted)
* Information about the last failure if exists
This change also slightly modifies the stats response,
so that is can easier consumer by monitoring and other
users. (coordinators stats are now in a list instead of
a map and has an additional field for the node id)
Relates to #32789
The enrich api returns enrich coordinator stats and
information about currently executing enrich policies.
The coordinator stats include per ingest node:
* The current number of search requests in the queue.
* The total number of outstanding remote requests that
have been executed since node startup. Each remote
request is likely to include multiple search requests.
This depends on how much search requests are in the
queue at the time when the remote request is performed.
* The number of current outstanding remote requests.
* The total number of search requests that `enrich`
processors have executed since node startup.
The current execution policies stats include:
* The name of policy that is executing
* A full blow task info object that is executing the policy.
Relates to #32789
Besides a rename, this changes allows to processor to attach multiple
enrich docs to the document being ingested.
Also in order to control the maximum number of enrich docs to be
included in the document being ingested, the `max_matches` setting
is added to the enrich processor.
Relates #32789
A policy type controls how the enrich index is created and
the query executed against the match field. Currently there
is a single policy type (`exact_match`). In the near future
more policy types will be added and different policy may have
different configuration options.
For this reason type should be a json object instead of a string field:
```
{
"exact_match": {
...
}
}
```
instead of:
```
{
"type": "exact_match",
...
}
```
This will make streaming parsing of enrich policies easier as in the
new format, the parsing code can know ahead what configuration fields
to expect. In the latter format that is not possible if the type field
appears not as the first field.
Relates to #32789
Enrich processor configuration changes:
* Renamed `enrich_key` option to `field` option.
* Replaced `set_from` and `targets` options with `target_field`.
The `target_field` option behaves different to how `set_from` and
`targets` worked. The `target_field` is the field that will contain
the looked up document.
Relates to #32789
The get and list APIs are a single API in this commit. Whether
requesting one named policy or all policies, a list of policies is
returened. The list API code has all been removed and the GET api is
what remains, which contains much of the list response code.
The delete policy had a subtle bug in that it would still delete the
policy if pipelines were accessing it, after giving the client back an
error. This commit fixes that and ensures it does not happen by adding
verification in the test.
If a pipeline that refrences the policy exists, we should not allow the
policy to be deleted. The user will need to remove the processor from
the pipeline before deleting the policy. This commit adds a check to
ensure that the policy cannot be deleted if it is referenced by any
pipeline in the system.
In the case that source and target are the same in `enrich_values` then
a string array can be specified.
For example instead of this:
```
PUT /_ingest/pipeline/my-pipeline
{
"processors": [
{
"enrich" : {
"policy_name": "my-policy",
"enrich_values": [
{
"source": "first_name",
"target": "first_name"
},
{
"source": "last_name",
"target": "last_name"
},
{
"source": "address",
"target": "address"
},
{
"source": "city",
"target": "city"
},
{
"source": "state",
"target": "state"
},
{
"source": "zip",
"target": "zip"
}
]
}
}
]
}
```
This more compact format can be specified:
```
PUT /_ingest/pipeline/my-pipeline
{
"processors": [
{
"enrich" : {
"policy_name": "my-policy",
"targets": [
"first_name",
"last_name",
"address",
"city",
"state",
"zip"
]
}
}
]
}
```
And the `enrich_values` key has been renamed to `set_from`.
Relates to #32789
This commit adds permissions validation on the indices provided in the
enrich policy. These indices should be validated at store time so as not
to have cryptic error messages in the event the user does not have
permissions to access said indices.
This commit adds the manage_enrich privilege, which grants access to all
of the enrich processor lifecycle actions. In addition this commit also
creates a role which grants access to the generated indices.
Relates #41939
Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
The enrich key field is being kept track in _meta field by the policy runner.
The ingest processor uses the field name defined in enrich index _meta field and
not in the policy. This will avoid problems if policy is changed without
a new enrich index being created.
This also complete decouples EnrichPolicy from ExactMatchProcessor.
The following scenario results in failure without this change:
1) Create policy
2) Execute policy
3) Create pipeline with enrich processor
4) Use pipeline
5) Update enrich key in policy
6) Use pipeline, which then fails.
The enrich processor performs a lookup in a locally allocated
enrich index shard using a field value from the document being enriched.
If there is a match then the _source of the enrich document is fetched.
The document being enriched then gets the decorate values from the
enrich document based on the configured decorate fields in the pipeline.
Note that the usage of the _source field is temporary until the enrich
source field that is part of #41521 is merged into the enrich branch.
Using the _source field involves significant decompression which not
desired for enrich use cases.
The policy contains the information what field in the enrich index
to query and what fields are available to decorate a document being
enriched with.
The enrich processor has the following configuration options:
* `policy_name` - the name of the policy this processor should use
* `enrich_key` - the field in the document being enriched that holds to lookup value
* `ignore_missing` - Whether to allow the key field to be missing
* `enrich_values` - a list of fields to decorate the document being enriched with.
Each entry holds a source field and a target field.
The source field indicates what decorate field to use that is available in the policy.
The target field controls the field name to use in the document being enriched.
The source and target fields can be the same.
Example pipeline config:
```
{
"processors": [
{
"policy_name": "my_policy",
"enrich_key": "host_name",
"enrich_values": [
{
"source": "globalRank",
"target": "global_rank"
}
]
}
]
}
```
In the above example documents are being enriched with a global rank value.
For each document that has match in the enrich index based on its host_name field,
the document gets an global rank field value, which is fetched from the `globalRank`
field in the enrich index and saved as `global_rank` in the document being enriched.
This is PR is part one of #41521
move put policy api yaml test to this rest module.
The main benefit is that all tests will then be run when running:
`./gradlew -p x-pack/plugin/enrich check`
The rest qa module starts a node with default distribution and basic
license.
This qa module will also be used for adding different rest tests (not yaml),
for example rest tests needed for #41532
Also when we are going to work on security integration then we can
add a security qa module under the qa folder. Also at some point
we should add a multi node qa module.
Jake Landis
Rene Groeschke
Rory Hunter
Martijn van Groningen
James Baiera
Michael Basnight