This allows any datetime function to be present in `EXTRACT` which feels
more consistent. `EXTRACT(FOO FROM bar)` is now just sugar for
`FOO(bar)`. This is *much* simpler to explain in the documentation then
"these 10 fields are supported by extract and they are the same as this
subset of the datetime functions."
The implementation of this is a little simpler then the old way. Instead
of resolving the function in the parser we create an
`UnresolvedFunction` that looks *almost* just like what we'd create for
a single argument function and resolve the function in the `Analyzer`.
This feels like a net positive as it allows us to group `EXTRACT`
resolution failures with other function resolution failures.
This also creates `UnresolvedFunctionTests` and
`UnresolvedAttributeTests`. I had to create `UnresolvedFunctionTests`
because `UnreolvedFunction` now has three boolean parameters which is
incompatible with the generic `NodeSubclassTests`'s requirement that all
ctor parameters be unique. I created `UnresolvedAttributeTests` because
I didn't want `UnresolvedFunctionTests` to call `NodeSubclassTests` and
figured that we'd want `UnresolvedAttributeTest` eventually and now felt
like as good a time as any.
Added a
Original commit: elastic/x-pack-elasticsearch@358aada308
* Starts to build the list of supported functions, adding links to
wikipedia when there is any doubt what the functions mean.
* Extracts an example of using the function from the test suite.
* Explicitly calls out how we round (half up) because there are
lots of ways to round.
Original commit: elastic/x-pack-elasticsearch@5fb64ba869
Nik Everett
Costin Leau
Costin Leau