The remove-ilm-from-index API was using the DELETE http method
to signify that something is being removed. Although, metadata
about ILM for the index is being deleted, no entity/resource
is being deleted during this operation. POST is more in line with
what this API is actually doing, it is modifying the metadata for
an index. As part of this change, `remove` is also appended to the path
to be more explicit about its actions.
Error was thrown if leader index had no soft deletes enabled, but it then continued creating the follower index.
The test caught this bug, but very rarely due to timing issue.
Build failure instance:
```
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,597][INFO ][o.e.x.c.LocalIndexFollowingIT] [testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes] before test
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,599][INFO ][o.e.c.s.ClusterSettings ] [node_s_0] updating [cluster.remote.local.seeds] from [[]] to [["127.0.0.1:9300"]]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,599][INFO ][o.e.c.s.ClusterSettings ] [node_s_0] updating [cluster.remote.local.seeds] from [[]] to [["127.0.0.1:9300"]]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,609][INFO ][o.e.c.m.MetaDataCreateIndexService] [node_s_0] [leader-index] creating index, cause [api], templates [random-soft-deletes-templat
e, one_shard_index_template], shards [2]/[0], mappings []
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,628][INFO ][o.e.c.r.a.AllocationService] [node_s_0] Cluster health status changed from [YELLOW] to [GREEN] (reason: [shards started [[leader-
index][0]] ...]).
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,660][INFO ][o.e.x.c.a.TransportPutFollowAction] [node_s_0] [follower-index] creating index, cause [ccr_create_and_follow], shards [2]/[0]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,675][INFO ][o.e.c.s.ClusterSettings ] [node_s_0] updating [cluster.remote.local.seeds] from [["127.0.0.1:9300"]] to [[]]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,676][INFO ][o.e.c.s.ClusterSettings ] [node_s_0] updating [cluster.remote.local.seeds] from [["127.0.0.1:9300"]] to [[]]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,678][INFO ][o.e.x.c.LocalIndexFollowingIT] [testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes] after test
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,678][INFO ][o.e.x.c.LocalIndexFollowingIT] [testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes] [LocalIndexFollowingIT#testDoNotCreateFoll
owerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes]: cleaning up after test
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,678][INFO ][o.e.c.m.MetaDataDeleteIndexService] [node_s_0] [follower-index/TlWlXp0JSVasju2Kr_hksQ] deleting index
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,678][INFO ][o.e.c.m.MetaDataDeleteIndexService] [node_s_0] [leader-index/FQ6EwIWcRAKD8qvOg2eS8g] deleting index
FAILURE 0.23s J0 | LocalIndexFollowingIT.testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes <<< FAILURES!
> Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError:
> Expected: <false>
> but: was <true>
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([7A3C89DA3BCA17DD:65C26CBF6FEF0B39]:0)
> at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
> at org.elasticsearch.xpack.ccr.LocalIndexFollowingIT.testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes(LocalIndexFollowingIT.java:83)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```
Build failure: https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+6.5+intake/46/console
Override `process()` in `BinaryLogicProcessor` which doesn't immediately
return null if left or right argument is null, which is the behaviour of
`process()` of the parent class `BinaryProcessor`.
Also, add more tests for `AND` and `OR` in SELECT clause with literal.
Fixes: #35240
We have seen an improvement when we bumped the timeout from 1s to 5s, but there are still a few failures for this tests. With this commit we bump the timeout to 10 seconds hoping it will stop all the failures.
* Add missing up-to-date configuration
The source properties file and the dynamic elasticsearch version
(set based on properties ) were missing from task outputs leading
to the task being incorrectly considered up to date.
Closes#35204
Today if a wildcard, date-math expression or alias expands/resolves
to an index that is search-throttled we still search it. This is likely
not the desired behavior since it can unexpectedly slow down searches
significantly.
This change adds a new indices option that allows `search`, `count`
and `msearch` to ignore throttled indices by default. Users can
force expansion to throttled indices by using `ignore_throttled=true`
on the rest request to expand also to throttled indices.
Relates to #34352
This moves all Realm settings to an Affix definition.
However, because different realm types define different settings
(potentially conflicting settings) this requires that the realm type
become part of the setting key.
Thus, we now need to define realm settings as:
xpack.security.authc.realms:
file.file1:
order: 0
native.native1:
order: 1
- This is a breaking change to realm config
- This is also a breaking change to custom security realms (SecurityExtension)
This is a forward port of some of the changes made in #8445, specifically the change mentioned in https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/34023#issuecomment-433212636.
Currently, in master, the `cluster_stats` collector collects _all_ cluster metadata and indexes it into `.monitoring-es-*`. However, per the discussion linked to above, we decided to collect _only_ the `display_name` cluster metadata setting for now. This PR makes this change.
Add NotEquals node in parser to simplify expressions so that <value1> != <value2> is
no longer translated internally to NOT(<value1> = <value2>)
Closes: #35210Fixes: #35233
This adds a new step for checking whether an index is allocated correctly based
on the rules added prior to running the shrink step. It also fixes a bug where
for shrink we are not allowed to have the shards relocating for the shrink step.
This also allows us to simplify AllocationRoutedStep and provide better
feedback in the step info for why either the allocation or the shrink checks
have failed.
Resolves#34938
We have an example in `reindex`'s docs about copying from many indices
at once. It doesn't work at the moment because we only allow a single
type per index. We didn't notice it in the docs tests because those
tests didn't copy any documents. This change:
1. Adds documents to the docs tests to fully exercise the snippet.
2. Fixes the example by moving all copied documents to the same type.
3. Moves the note about id collisions and expands on it because it is
even more likely than before.
Closes#35150
If the Rollover step would fail due to the next index in sequence
already existing, just skip to the next step instead of going to the
Error step.
This prevents spurious `ResourceAlreadyExistsException`s created by
simultaneous RolloverStep executions from causing ILM to error out
unnecessarily.
This test has a bug that got introduced during the refactoring of #32442. With 2 concurrent term increments,
we can only assert under the operation permit that we are in the correct operation term, not that there is
not already another term bump pending.
Closes#34862
This commit removes the Joda time usage from ILM and the HLRC components of ILM.
It also fixes an issue where using the `?human=true` flag could have caused the
parser not to work. These millisecond fields now follow the standard we use
elsewhere in the code, with additional fields added iff the `human` flag is
specified.
This is a breaking change for ILM, but since ILM has not yet been released, no
compatibility shim is needed.
If the random query string is "now" by accident _and_ we are also not setting
some field names to use explicitely, then we can hit the "mapped_date" field
from default test setup. This correctly leads to the query being was marked as
not cacheable, but we assume and check so later. This change fixes this rare
edge case by making sure we don't hit the "date" field in this rare cases.
Closes#35183
When the engine is asked for historical operations, we check if some of the requested operations
are not yet refreshed and if so we refresh before returning the operations. The refresh check is
based on capturing the local checkpoint before each refresh and comparing that value to the one
requested when `newChangesSnapshot` was called. If the requested range is above the captured
local checkpoint we issue a refresh.
This can currently cause unneeded extra refreshes if the method is called concurrently which may cause unwanted degradation in indexing performance. This is especially relevant for CCR where we always ask for a range below the global checkpoint. That range is guaranteed to be below the local
checkpoint of the shard and one refresh is enough to serve multiple changes requests.
This commit fixes this by introducing a dedicated mutex to make sure the test for whether a refresh
is needed actually wait for concurrents for concurrent refreshes that were caused by another
change refresh.
Note that this is not a big change in semantics as refreshes are serialized by lucene anyway. I also
opted not to keep the synchronization to the changes snapshot request only even if in theory we
can apply it to all refreshes, not matter where they come from.
The suite FollowerFailOverIT is failing because some documents are not
replicated to the follower. Maybe the FollowTask is not working as
expected or the background indexers eat all resources while the follower
cluster is trying to reform after a failover; then CI is not fast enough
to replicate all the indexed docs within 60 seconds (sometimes I see 80k
docs on the leader).
This commit limits the number of documents to be indexed into the leader
index by the background threads so that we can eliminate the latter
case. This change also replaces a docCount assertion with a docIds
assertion so we can have more information if these tests fail again.
Relates #33337
javanna
Zachary Tong
Andrei Stefan
Nik Everett
Gytis Šk
Tal Levy
Martijn van Groningen
Marios Trivyzas
Simon Willnauer
Alpar Torok
Jim Ferenczi
Costin Leau
Nick Knize
Alan Woodward
Jeff Soloshy
Tim Vernum
Tim Vernum
Shaunak Kashyap
lcawl
Jake Landis
Armin Braun
Lee Hinman
Alexander Zhukov
Gordon Brown
Yannick Welsch
Benjamin Trent
Vladimir Dolzhenko
Christoph Büscher
Alexander Reelsen
David Kyle
Mayya Sharipova
Boaz Leskes
Nhat Nguyen