When using S3 or EC2, it was possible to use a proxy to access EC2 or S3 API but username and password were not possible to be set.
This commit adds support for this. Also, to make all that consistent, proxy settings for both plugins have been renamed:
* from `cloud.aws.proxy_host` to `cloud.aws.proxy.host`
* from `cloud.aws.ec2.proxy_host` to `cloud.aws.ec2.proxy.host`
* from `cloud.aws.s3.proxy_host` to `cloud.aws.s3.proxy.host`
* from `cloud.aws.proxy_port` to `cloud.aws.proxy.port`
* from `cloud.aws.ec2.proxy_port` to `cloud.aws.ec2.proxy.port`
* from `cloud.aws.s3.proxy_port` to `cloud.aws.s3.proxy.port`
New settings are `proxy.username` and `proxy.password`.
```yml
cloud:
aws:
protocol: https
proxy:
host: proxy1.company.com
port: 8083
username: myself
password: theBestPasswordEver!
```
You can also set different proxies for `ec2` and `s3`:
```yml
cloud:
aws:
s3:
proxy:
host: proxy1.company.com
port: 8083
username: myself1
password: theBestPasswordEver1!
ec2:
proxy:
host: proxy2.company.com
port: 8083
username: myself2
password: theBestPasswordEver2!
```
Note that `password` is filtered with `SettingsFilter`.
We also fix a potential issue in S3 repository. We were supposed to accept key/secret either set under `cloud.aws` or `cloud.aws.s3` but the actual code never implemented that.
It was:
```java
account = settings.get("cloud.aws.access_key");
key = settings.get("cloud.aws.secret_key");
```
We replaced that by:
```java
String account = settings.get(CLOUD_S3.KEY, settings.get(CLOUD_AWS.KEY));
String key = settings.get(CLOUD_S3.SECRET, settings.get(CLOUD_AWS.SECRET));
```
Also, we extract all settings for S3 in `AwsS3Service` as it's already the case for `AwsEc2Service` class.
Closes#15268.
Do not to load fields from _source when using the `fields` option.
Non stored (non existing) fields are ignored by the fields visitor when using the `fields` option.
Fixes#10783
Support * wildcard to retrieve stored fields when using the `fields` option.
Supported pattern styles are "xxx*", "*xxx", "*xxx*" and "xxx*yyy".
In the example we show an `exists` query inside a constant score query. While this is possible, it can mislead users to think it is necessary so we should remove it.
