Until now we had a cloud-aws plugin which is providing 2 disctinct features:
* discovery on EC2
* snapshot/restore on S3
This commit splits the plugin by feature so people can use either one or the other or both features.
Doc is updated accordingly.
The shaded version of elasticsearch was built at the very beginning to avoid dependency conflicts in a specific case where:
* People use elasticsearch from Java
* People needs to embed elasticsearch jar within their own application (as it's today the only way to get a `TransportClient`)
* People also embed in their application another (most of the time older) version of dependency we are using for elasticsearch, such as: Guava, Joda, Jackson...
This conflict issue can be solved within the projects themselves by either upgrade the dependency version and use the one provided by elasticsearch or by shading elasticsearch project and relocating some conflicting packages.
Example
-------
As an example, let's say you want to use within your project `Joda 2.1` but elasticsearch `2.0.0-beta1` provides `Joda 2.8`.
Let's say you also want to run all that with shield plugin.
Create a new maven project or module with:
```xml
<groupId>fr.pilato.elasticsearch.test</groupId>
<artifactId>es-shaded</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<properties>
<elasticsearch.version>2.0.0-beta1</elasticsearch.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.elasticsearch</groupId>
<artifactId>elasticsearch</artifactId>
<version>${elasticsearch.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.elasticsearch.plugin</groupId>
<artifactId>shield</artifactId>
<version>${elasticsearch.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
```
And now shade and relocate all packages which conflicts with your own application:
```xml
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>shade</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<relocations>
<relocation>
<pattern>org.joda</pattern>
<shadedPattern>fr.pilato.thirdparty.joda</shadedPattern>
</relocation>
</relocations>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
```
You can create now a shaded version of elasticsearch + shield by running `mvn clean install`.
In your project, you can now depend on:
```xml
<dependency>
<groupId>fr.pilato.elasticsearch.test</groupId>
<artifactId>es-shaded</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>joda-time</groupId>
<artifactId>joda-time</artifactId>
<version>2.1</version>
</dependency>
```
Build then your TransportClient as usual:
```java
TransportClient client = TransportClient.builder()
.settings(Settings.builder()
.put("path.home", ".")
.put("shield.user", "username:password")
.put("plugin.types", "org.elasticsearch.shield.ShieldPlugin")
)
.build();
client.addTransportAddress(new InetSocketTransportAddress(new InetSocketAddress("localhost", 9300)));
// Index some data
client.prepareIndex("test", "doc", "1").setSource("foo", "bar").setRefresh(true).get();
SearchResponse searchResponse = client.prepareSearch("test").get();
```
If you want to use your own version of Joda, then import for example `org.joda.time.DateTime`. If you want to access to the shaded version (not recommended though), import `fr.pilato.thirdparty.joda.time.DateTime`.
You can run a simple test to make sure that both classes can live together within the same JVM:
```java
CodeSource codeSource = new org.joda.time.DateTime().getClass().getProtectionDomain().getCodeSource();
System.out.println("unshaded = " + codeSource);
codeSource = new fr.pilato.thirdparty.joda.time.DateTime().getClass().getProtectionDomain().getCodeSource();
System.out.println("shaded = " + codeSource);
```
It will print:
```
unshaded = (file:/path/to/joda-time-2.1.jar <no signer certificates>)
shaded = (file:/path/to/es-shaded-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar <no signer certificates>)
```
This PR also removes fully-loaded module.
By the way, the project can now build with Maven 3.3.3 so we can relax a bit our maven policy.
Prior to 2.0 we summed up the available space on all disk on a node
due to the raid-0 like behavior. Now we don't do this anymore and use the
min & max disk space to make decisions.
Closes#13106
detect_noop is pretty cheap and noop updates compartively expensive so this
feels like a sensible default.
Also had to do some testing and documentation around how _ttl works with
detect_noop.
Closes#11282
Until a couple of hours ago we expected the position_offset_gap to default
to 0 in 2.0 and 100 in 2.1. We decided it was worth backporting that new
default to 2.0. So now that its backported we need to teach 2.1 that 2.0
also defaults to 100.
Closes#7268
This is much more fiddly than you'd expect it to be because of the way
position_offset_gap is applied in StringFieldMapper. Instead of setting
the default to 100 its simpler to make sure that all the analyzers default
to 100 and that StringFieldMapper doesn't override the default unless the
user specifies something different. Unless the index was created before
2.1, in which case the old default of 0 has to take.
Also postition_offset_gaps less than 0 aren't allowed at all.
New tests test that:
1. the new default doesn't match phrases across values with reasonably low
slop (5)
2. the new default doest match phrases across values with reasonably high
slop (50)
3. you can override the value and phrases work as you'd expect
4. if you leave the value undefined in the mapping and define it on a
custom analyzer the the value from the custom analyzer shines through
Closes#7268
Britta Weber
Britta Weber
David Pilato
Adrien Grand
Lee Hinman
Colin Goodheart-Smithe
Shane Connelly
Robert Muir
Nik Everett
Robert Muir
Clinton Gormley
xuzha
Tanguy Leroux
Simon Willnauer
Michael McCandless
Ryan Ernst
Michael McCandless
Igor Motov
Dan Tuffery