* Merge test runner task into RestIntegTest (#60261)
* Merge test runner task into RestIntegTest
* Reorganizing Standalone runner and RestIntegTest task
* Rework general test task configuration and extension
* Fix merge issues
* use former 7.x common test configuration
* Remove usage of deprecated testCompile configuration
* Replace testCompile usage by testImplementation
* Make testImplementation non transitive by default (as we did for testCompile)
* Update CONTRIBUTING about using testImplementation for test dependencies
* Fail on testCompile configuration usage
We believe there's no longer a need to be able to disable basic-license
features completely using the "xpack.*.enabled" settings. If users don't
want to use those features, they simply don't need to use them. Having
such features always available lets us build more complex features that
assume basic-license features are present.
This commit deprecates settings of the form "xpack.*.enabled" for
basic-license features, excluding "security", which is a special case.
It also removes deprecated settings from integration tests and unit
tests where they're not directly relevant; e.g. monitoring and ILM are
no longer disabled in many integration tests.
Currently when an ILM policy finishes its execution, the index moves into the `TerminalPolicyStep`,
denoted by a completed/completed/completed phase/action/step lifecycle execution state.
This commit changes the behavior so that the index lifecycle execution state halts at the last
configured phase's `PhaseCompleteStep`, so for instance, if an index were configured with a policy
containing a `hot` and `cold` phase, the index would stop at the `cold/complete/complete`
`PhaseCompleteStep`. This allows an ILM user to update the policy to add any later phases and have
indices configured to use that policy pick up execution at the newly added "later" phase. For
example, if a `delete` phase were added to the policy specified about, the index would then move
from `cold/complete/complete` into the `delete` phase.
Relates to #48431
It's possible that the index could return no settings and thus throw a
`NullPointerException`.
I wasn't able to reproduce the original issue, but this should guard
against in the future.
Resolves#50646
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport of #48849. Update `.editorconfig` to make the Java settings the
default for all files, and then apply a 2-space indent to all `*.gradle`
files. Then reformat all the files.
When checking for the existence of a document in the ILM/CCR integration
tests, `assertDocumentExists` makes an HTTP request and checks the
response code. However, if the repsonse code is not successful, the call
will throw a `ResponseException`. `assertDocumentExists` is often called
inside an `assertBusy`, and wrapping the `ResponseException` in an
`AssertionError` will allow the `assertBusy` to retry.
In particular, this fixes an issue with `testCCRUnfollowDuringSnapshot`
where the index in question may still be closed when the document is
requested.
* Restrict which tasks can use testclusters
This PR fixes a problem between the interaction of test-clusters and
build cache.
Before this any task could have used a cluster without tracking it as
input.
With this change a new interface is introduced to track the tasks that
can use clusters and we do consider the cluster as input for all of
them.
* Rename indexlifecycle to ilm and snapshotlifecycle to slm (#44917)
As a followup to #44725 and #44608, which renamed the packages within
the x-pack project, this renames the packages within the core x-pack
project. It also renames 'snapshotlifecycle' within the HLRC to slm.
* Fix one more import
This commit renames the ILM package from indexlifecycle to ilm. We have
all come to know index lifecycle management as ILM, the APIs and
settings use ilm, and it would be nice of the package did too. This
commit makes that change.
Test clusters currently has its own set of logic for dealing with
finding different versions of Elasticsearch, downloading them, and
extracting them. This commit converts testclusters to use the
DistributionDownloadPlugin.
This commit adds functionality so that aliases that are manipulated on
leader indices are replicated by the shard follow tasks to the follower
indices. Note that we ignore write indices. This is due to the fact that
follower indices do not receive direct writes so the concept is not
useful.
Relates #41815
* Replace usages RandomizedTestingTask with built-in Gradle Test (#40978)
This commit replaces the existing RandomizedTestingTask and supporting code with Gradle's built-in JUnit support via the Test task type. Additionally, the previous workaround to disable all tasks named "test" and create new unit testing tasks named "unitTest" has been removed such that the "test" task now runs unit tests as per the normal Gradle Java plugin conventions.
(cherry picked from commit 323f312bbc829a63056a79ebe45adced5099f6e6)
* Fix forking JVM runner
* Don't bump shadow plugin version
It is possible that the Unfollow API may fail to release shard history
retention leases when unfollowing, so this needs to be handled by the
ILM Unfollow action. There's nothing much that can be done automatically
about it from the follower side, so this change makes the ILM unfollow
action simply ignore those failures.
This test should no longer pass when the functionality it is intended to
test is broken, as it now indexes a number of documents and verifies
that the index is staying on the same step until after indexing and
replication of those documents is finished. This prevents the test from
passing if the leader index progresses in its lifecycle during that time.
This commit attempts to remove the retention leases on the leader shards
when unfollowing an index. This is best effort, since the leader might
not be available.
This commit is the first step in integrating shard history retention
leases with CCR. In this commit we integrate shard history retention
leases with recovery from remote. Before we start transferring files, we
take out a retention lease on the primary. Then during the file copy
phase, we repeatedly renew the retention lease. Finally, when recovery
from remote is complete, we disable the background renewing of the
retention lease.
`CreateIndexRequest#source(Map<String, Object>, ... )`, which is used when
deserializing index creation requests, accidentally accepts mappings that are
nested twice under the type key (as described in the bug report #38266).
This in turn causes us to be too lenient in parsing typeless mappings. In
particular, we accept the following index creation request, even though it
should not contain the type key `_doc`:
```
PUT index?include_type_name=false
{
"mappings": {
"_doc": {
"properties": { ... }
}
}
}
```
There is a similar issue for both 'put templates' and 'put mappings' requests
as well.
This PR makes the minimal changes to detect and reject these typed mappings in
requests. It does not address #38266 generally, or attempt a larger refactor
around types in these server-side requests, as I think this should be done at a
later time.
This test should not pass until CCR finishes integrating shard history
retention leases. It currently sometimes passes (which is a bug in the
test), but cannot pass reliably until the linked issue is resolved.
Adds a Step to the Shrink and Delete actions which prevents those
actions from running on a leader index - all follower indices must first
unfollow the leader index before these actions can run. This prevents
the loss of history before follower indices are ready, which might
otherwise result in the loss of data.
This commit modifies the put follow index action to use a
CcrRepository when creating a follower index. It routes
the logic through the snapshot/restore process. A
wait_for_active_shards parameter can be used to configure
how long to wait before returning the response.
We inject an Unfollow action before Shrink because the Shrink action
cannot be safely used on a following index, as it may not be fully
caught up with the leader index before the "original" following index is
deleted and replaced with a non-following Shrunken index. The Unfollow
action will verify that 1) the index is marked as "complete", and 2) all
operations up to this point have been replicated from the leader to the
follower before explicitly disconnecting the follower from the leader.
Injecting an Unfollow action before the Rollover action is done mainly
as a convenience: This allow users to use the same lifecycle policy on
both the leader and follower cluster without having to explictly modify
the policy to unfollow the index, while doing what we expect users to
want in most cases.
Some steps, such as steps that delete, close, or freeze an index, may fail due to a currently running snapshot of the index. In those cases, rather than move to the ERROR step, we should retry the step when the snapshot has completed.
This change adds an abstract step (`AsyncRetryDuringSnapshotActionStep`) that certain steps (like the ones I mentioned above) can extend that will automatically handle a situation where a snapshot is taking place. When a `SnapshotInProgressException` is received by the listener wrapper, a `ClusterStateObserver` listener is registered to wait until the snapshot has completed, re-running the ILM action when no snapshot is occurring.
This also adds integration tests for these scenarios (thanks to @talevy in #37552).
Resolves#37541
This change adds the unfollow action for CCR follower indices.
This is needed for the shrink action in case an index is a follower index.
This will give the follower index the opportunity to fully catch up with
the leader index, pause index following and unfollow the leader index.
After this the shrink action can safely perform the ilm shrink.
The unfollow action needs to be added to the hot phase and acts as
barrier for going to the next phase (warm or delete phases), so that
follower indices are being unfollowed properly before indices are expected
to go in read-only mode. This allows the force merge action to execute
its steps safely.
The unfollow action has three steps:
* `wait-for-indexing-complete` step: waits for the index in question
to get the `index.lifecycle.indexing_complete` setting be set to `true`
* `wait-for-follow-shard-tasks` step: waits for all the shard follow tasks
for the index being handled to report that the leader shard global checkpoint
is equal to the follower shard global checkpoint.
* `pause-follower-index` step: Pauses index following, necessary to unfollow
* `close-follower-index` step: Closes the index, necessary to unfollow
* `unfollow-follower-index` step: Actually unfollows the index using
the CCR Unfollow API
* `open-follower-index` step: Reopens the index now that it is a normal index
* `wait-for-yellow` step: Waits for primary shards to be allocated after
reopening the index to ensure the index is ready for the next step
In the case of the last two steps, if the index in being handled is
a regular index then the steps acts as a no-op.
Relates to #34648
Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gordon Brown <gordon.brown@elastic.co>
Rene Groeschke
Lee Hinman
William Brafford
Nhat Nguyen
Rory Hunter
Gordon Brown
Dimitrios Liappis
Alpar Torok
Jason Tedor
Ryan Ernst
Mark Vieira
Julie Tibshirani
Tim Brooks
Martijn van Groningen