The Java API documentation for index administration currenty is wrong because
the PutMappingRequestBuilder#setSource(Object... source) and
CreateIndexRequestBuilder#addMapping(String type, Object... source) methods
delegate to methods that check that the input arguments are valid key/value
pairs:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/java-api/current/java-admin-indices.html
This changes the docs so the java api code examples are included from
documentation integration tests so we detect compile and runtime issues earlier.
Closes#28131
When using the High Level Rest Client 6.0.0-beta1, we are missing some transitive dependencies for Lucene as Lucene 7 has not been released yet. See the following `pom.xml`:
```xml
<dependency>
<groupId>org.elasticsearch.client</groupId>
<artifactId>elasticsearch-rest-client</artifactId>
<version>6.0.0-beta1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.elasticsearch.client</groupId>
<artifactId>elasticsearch-rest-high-level-client</artifactId>
<version>6.0.0-beta1</version>
</dependency>
```
It gives:
```
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project fscrawler: Could not resolve dependencies for project fr.pilato.elasticsearch.crawler:fscrawler:jar:2.4-SNAPSHOT: The following artifacts could not be resolved: org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers-common:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-backward-codecs:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-grouping:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-highlighter:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-join:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-memory:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-misc:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-queries:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-queryparser:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-sandbox:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-spatial:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-spatial-extras:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-spatial3d:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9, org.apache.lucene:lucene-suggest:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9: Failure to find org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers-common:jar:7.0.0-snapshot-00142c9 in https://artifacts.elastic.co/maven/ was cached in the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of elastic-download-service has elapsed or updates are forced -
```
We need to add some temporary documentation on how to add the missing repository to a gradle or maven project:
```xml
<repository>
<id>elastic-lucene-snapshots</id>
<name>Elastic Lucene Snapshots</name>
<url>http://s3.amazonaws.com/download.elasticsearch.org/lucenesnapshots/00142c9</url>
<releases><enabled>true</enabled></releases>
<snapshots><enabled>false</enabled></snapshots>
</repository>
```
This also applies to the transport client.
Closes#26106.
We publish javadocs to artifacts.elastic.co (and snapshots.elastic.co) for a while. This commit adds the link to them to the transport client, low level REST client, sniffer and high level REST client pages.
Closes#23761
The Log4j dependency is separated into two artifacts, the API and the
core implementation. This is to enable replacing Log4j on the backend
through the SLF4J bridge with another logging implementation. For this
reason, the dependencies are marked as optional. This causes confusion
amongst users as to use the bridge, the API should be non-optional since
it is needed for the bridge to function correctly. While they could pull
it into their application directly, it would be clearer if we simply
marked this depdendency as non-optional. Note that this does not mean
that users have to use Log4j for logging in their application, so we are
not marking core as required, it only clarifies what they need to be
able to plug in a different logging implementation.
Relates #25136
* Add parent-join module
This change adds a new module named `parent-join`.
The goal of this module is to provide a replacement for the `_parent` field but as a first step this change only moves the `has_child`, `has_parent` queries and the `children` aggregation to this module.
These queries and aggregations are no longer in core but they are deployed by default as a module.
Relates #20257
This commit adds support for histogram and date_histogram agg compound order by refactoring and reusing terms agg order code. The major change is that the Terms.Order and Histogram.Order classes have been replaced/refactored into a new class BucketOrder. This is a breaking change for the Java Transport API. For backward compatibility with previous ES versions the (date)histogram compound order will use the first order. Also the _term and _time aggregation order keys have been deprecated; replaced by _key.
Relates to #20003: now that all these aggregations use the same order code, it should be easier to move validation to parse time (as a follow up PR).
Relates to #14771: histogram and date_histogram aggregation order will now be validated at reduce time.
Closes#23613: if a single BucketOrder that is not a tie-breaker is added with the Java Transport API, it will be converted into a CompoundOrder with a tie-breaker.
We've had `QueryDSLDocumentationTests` for a while but it had a very
hopeful comment at the top about how we want to make sure that the
example in the query-dsl docs match up with the test but we never
had anything that made *sure* that they did. This changes that!
Now the examples from the query-dsl docs are all built from the
`QueryDSLDocumentationTests`. All except for the percolator example
because that is hard to do as it stands now.
To make this easier this change moves `QueryDSLDocumentationTests`
from core and into the high level rest client. This is useful for
two reasons:
1. We expect the high level rest client to be able to use the builders.
2. The code that builds that docs doesn't check out all of
Elasticsearch. It only checks out certain directories. Since we're
already including snippets from that directory we don't have to
make any changes to that process.
Closes#24320
This commit upgrades the Log4j dependencies from version 2.7 to version
2.8.2. This release includes a fix for a case where Log4j could lose
exceptions in the presence of a security manager.
Relates #23995
The reindex API is mature now, and we will work to maintain backwards
compatibility in accordance with our backwards compatibility
policy. This commit unmarks the reindex API as experimental.
Relates #23621
When using a bulk processor in test, you might write something like:
```java
BulkProcessor bulkProcessor = BulkProcessor.builder(client, new BulkProcessor.Listener() {
@Override public void beforeBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request) {}
@Override public void afterBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request, BulkResponse response) {}
@Override public void afterBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request, Throwable failure) {}
})
.setBulkActions(10000)
.setFlushInterval(TimeValue.timeValueSeconds(10))
.build();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
bulkProcessor.add(new IndexRequest("foo", "bar", "doc_" + i)
.source(jsonBuilder().startObject().field("foo", "bar").endObject()
));
}
bulkProcessor.flush();
client.admin().indices().prepareRefresh("foo").get();
SearchResponse response = client.prepareSearch("foo").get();
// response does not contain any hit
```
The problem is that by default bulkProcessor defines the number of concurrent requests to 1 which is using behind the scene an Async BulkRequestHandler.
When you call `flush()` in a test, you expect it to flush all the content of the bulk so you can search for your docs.
But because of the async handling, there is a great chance that none of the documents has been indexed yet when you call the `refresh` method.
We should advice in our Java guide to explicitly set concurrent requests to `0` so users will use behind the scene the Sync BulkRequestHandler.
```java
BulkProcessor bulkProcessor = BulkProcessor.builder(client, new BulkProcessor.Listener() {
@Override public void beforeBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request) {}
@Override public void afterBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request, BulkResponse response) {}
@Override public void afterBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request, Throwable failure) {}
})
.setBulkActions(5000)
.setFlushInterval(TimeValue.timeValueSeconds(10))
.setConcurrentRequests(0)
.build();
```
Closes#22158.
When we decided to deprecate and remove fuzzy query in #15760, we didn't realize we would take away the possibililty for uses to use a fuzzy query as part of a span query, which is not possible using match query. This means we have to go back and un-deprecate fuzzy query, which will not be removed.
Closes#15760
olcbean
David Pilato
Christoph Büscher
Combalgorythm
Martijn van Groningen
Simon Willnauer
Catalin Ursachi
Luca Cavanna
Christoph Büscher
Jason Tedor
jiangzhuolin
hanbj
Tanguy Leroux
Jim Ferenczi
qwerty4030
Nik Everett
makeyang
BUPTAnderson
Minwoo Kim
Clinton Gormley
Rob Moore
Rui Hu
Chris Earle