The default similarity was set to `classic` which refers to TFIDF and has not been moved after the upgrade to Lucene 6.
Though moving to BM25 could have some downside for queries that relies on coordination factor (match_query, multi_match_query) ?
relates #18944
```
> Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: file handle leaks: [SeekableByteChannel(/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/elastic+elasticsearch+master+g1gc/core/build/testrun/integTest/J0/temp/org.elasticsearch.search.suggest.CompletionSuggestSearch2xIT_518545A20D129C8C-001/tempDir-001/data/nodes/1/indices/4sTECv6WSJOJsw9L4CGamg/0/index/segments_1), SeekableByteChannel(/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/elastic+elasticsearch+master+g1gc/core/build/testrun/integTest/J0/temp/org.elasticsearch.search.suggest.CompletionSuggestSearch2xIT_518545A20D129C8C-001/tempDir-001/data/nodes/1/indices/4sTECv6WSJOJsw9L4CGamg/0/index/segments_1)]
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([518545A20D129C8C]:0)
> at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.LeakFS.onClose(LeakFS.java:63)
> at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.FilterFileSystem.close(FilterFileSystem.java:77)
> at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.FilterFileSystem.close(FilterFileSystem.java:78)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: java.lang.Exception
> at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.LeakFS.onOpen(LeakFS.java:46)
> at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.callOpenHook(HandleTrackingFS.java:81)
> at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.newByteChannel(HandleTrackingFS.java:271)
> at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.FilterFileSystemProvider.newByteChannel(FilterFileSystemProvider.java:212)
> at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.newByteChannel(HandleTrackingFS.java:240)
> at java.nio.file.Files.newByteChannel(Files.java:361)
> at java.nio.file.Files.newByteChannel(Files.java:407)
> at org.apache.lucene.store.SimpleFSDirectory.openInput(SimpleFSDirectory.java:77)
> at org.apache.lucene.store.FilterDirectory.openInput(FilterDirectory.java:94)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.slowFileExists(LuceneTestCase.java:2695)
> at org.apache.lucene.store.MockDirectoryWrapper.openInput(MockDirectoryWrapper.java:737)
> at org.apache.lucene.store.FilterDirectory.openInput(FilterDirectory.java:94)
> at org.elasticsearch.common.lucene.Lucene$1.doBody(Lucene.java:237)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:685)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:637)
> at org.elasticsearch.common.lucene.Lucene.checkSegmentInfoIntegrity(Lucene.java:242)
> at org.elasticsearch.index.store.Store$MetadataSnapshot.loadMetadata(Store.java:847)
> at org.elasticsearch.index.store.Store$MetadataSnapshot.<init>(Store.java:740)
> at org.elasticsearch.index.store.Store.getMetadata(Store.java:260)
> at org.elasticsearch.index.store.Store.getMetadata(Store.java:240)
> at org.elasticsearch.index.shard.IndexShard.doCheckIndex(IndexShard.java:1310)
> at org.elasticsearch.common.util.CancellableThreads.executeIO(CancellableThreads.java:102)
> at org.elasticsearch.index.shard.IndexShard.checkIndex(IndexShard.java:1288)
> at org.elasticsearch.index.shard.IndexShard.internalPerformTranslogRecovery(IndexShard.java:921)
> at org.elasticsearch.index.shard.IndexShard.skipTranslogRecovery(IndexShard.java:964)
> at org.elasticsearch.indices.recovery.RecoveryTarget.prepareForTranslogOperations(RecoveryTarget.java:297)
> at
```
We wrote that the document is:
```json
{
"value" : ["foo", "bar", "baz"]
}
```
But the processor is using a `values` field:
```json
{
"foreach" : {
"field" : "values",
"processors" : [
// ...
]
}
}
```
It should be `values`.
ES only sends a non-200 response all shards fail but we should
fail the tests generated by docs if any of them fail.
Depending on the outcome of #18978 this might be a temporary
workaround.
The MMapDirectory has a switch that allows the content of files to be loaded
into the filesystem cache upon opening. This commit exposes it with the new
`index.store.pre_load` setting.
Today we only emit that the setting wasn't found unless we have
some DYM suggestions. Yet, if a setting is not found at all and there
are no suggestions due to typos it's likely a removed setting or the plugin
that is supposed to be configured is not installed.
This commit adds some info text to the exception to help the user debugging
the problem before opening bugreports.
Instead of emitting:
`unknown setting [foo.bar]`
we now emit:
`unknown setting [foo.bar] please check the migration guide for removed settings and ensure that the plugin you are configuring is installed`
Relates to #18663
If someone sets `index.shard.check_on_startup`, indexing start up time can be slow (by design, it diligently goes and checks all data). If for some reason the shard is closed in that time, the store ref is kept around and prevents a new shard copy to be allocated to this node via the shard level locks. This is especially tricky if the shard is close due to a cancelled recovery which may re-restart soon.
This commit adds a cancellable threads instance to each IndexShard and perform index checking underneath it, so it can be cancelled on close.
We pretended to be able to ackt like a different version node for so long it's
time to be honest and remove this ability. It's just confusing and where needed
and tested we should build dedicated extension points.
This commit introduce unit testing infrastructure to test replication operations using real index shards. This is infra is complementary to the full integration tests and unit testing of ReplicationOperation we already have. The new ESIndexLevelReplicationTestCase base makes it easier to test and simulate failure mode that require real shards and but do not need the full blow stack of a complete node.
The commit also add a simple "nothing is wrong" test plus a test that checks we don't drop docs during the various stages of recovery.
For now, only single doc indexing is supported but this can be easily extended in the future.
This class was forked in 0.20 to remove a volatile keyword. While there
is no issue attached to the commit, no evidence of the criticality of the
change nor does it seem to be correct since we set this value internally as well
I think this class should be used as is from joda time even if we have to pay
the price of volatile reads. We can't do 3rd party optimization in our codebase that
way it just not maintainable.
This was added in 2280915d3c
Jim Ferenczi
Martijn van Groningen
Boaz Leskes
Jason Tedor
Robert Muir
Robert Muir
Mike McCandless
David Pilato
Nik Everett
Simon Willnauer
Eric Sherman
Adrien Grand
Simon Willnauer
Tanguy Leroux
Florian Hopf
Uwe Schindler
Ryan Ernst