The query shard reset() method resets some internal state in the
query shard context, like clearing query names, the filter flag
or named queries. The problem with this method being public is
that it currently (miss?) used for modifying an existing context
for recursive invocatiob, but the contexts that have been reseted
that way cannot be properly set back to their previous state.
This PR is a step towards removing reset() entirely by first making
it only be used internally in QueryShardContext. In places where
reset() was used we can either create new QueryShardContexts or
modify the existing context because it is discarded afterwards anyway.
Today, the constructor for IngestDocument#FieldPath does a string
concatentation and two object allocation on every field path. This
commit removes these unnecessary operations.
Relates #18108
With this commit we compress HTTP responses provided the client
supports it (as indicated by the HTTP header 'Accept-Encoding').
We're also able to process compressed HTTP requests if needed.
The default compression level is lowered from 6 to 3 as benchmarks
have indicated that this reduces query latency with a negligible
increase in network traffic.
Closes#7309
Don't try to compute completion stats on a reader after we already closed it
Conflicts:
core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/shard/IndexShard.java
This commit removes an unnecessary if statement in Bootstrap#check. The
removed if statement was duplicating the conditionals in the nested if
statements and was merely an artifact of an earlier refactoring.
Today when running in production mode the bootstrap checks are
completely unforgiving. But there are cases where an end-user might not
have the ability to modify some of the system-level settings that cause
the bootstrap checks to trip (e.g., guest settings that are inherited
from a host and can not be modified). This commit adds a setting that
allows system-level bootstrap checks to be ignored for these
end-users. We classify certain bootstrap checks into system-level checks
and only those bootstrap checks will be ignored if this flag is
enabled. All other bootstrap checks are still subject to being enforced
if the user is in production mode. We will still log warnings for these
bootstrap checks because the end-user does still need to be made aware
that they are running in a configuration that is less-than-ideal from a
resiliency perspective.
Relates #18088
This commit removes a racy but unnecessary assertion in scaling thread
pool idle test. Namely, the main test thread can reach the removed
assertion before the last few threads in the thread pool have completed
their tasks and caused the completed tasks count on the underlying
executor to be updated. But this assertion is unnecessary. The main test
thread already waits on a latch that is only decremented immediately
before a task completes. This ensures that it was in fact the case that
every submitted task was executed.
Closes#18072
When the termslookup (mocked in this case) doesn't return any terms, the
query used to rewrite to an empty boolean query. Now it rewrites to a
MatchNoDocsQuery. This changes the test expectation accordingly.
Closes#18071
This commit modifes the EsThreadPoolTestCase#info helper method to
return null when info for the thread pool can not be found. This really
should only happen for the "same" thread pool, and so we also assert
that we only get to a place where there is no info if the thread pool
that info was requested for is in fact the "same" thread pool. Not
returning null here and instead throwing an exception would fail tests
that tried to lookup info on the "same" thread pool.
Today we use a sliced lock strategy for acquiring locks to prevent
concurrent updates to the same document. The number of sliced locks is
computed as a linear function of the number of logical
processors. Unfortunately, the probability of a collision against a
sliced lock is prone to the birthday problem and grows faster than
expected. In fact, the mathematics works out such that for a fixed
target probability of collision, the number of lock slices should grow
like the square of the number of logical processors. This is
less-than-ideal, and we can do better anyway. This commit introduces a
strategy for avoiding lock contention within the internal
engine. Ideally, we would only have lock contention if there were
concurrent updates to the same document. We can get close to this ideal
world by associating a lock with the ID of each document. This
association can be held in a concurrent hash map. Now, the JDK
ConcurrentHashMap also uses a sliced lock internally, but it has several
strategies for avoiding taking the locks and these locks are only held
for a very short period of time. This implementation associates a
reference count with the lock that is associated with a document ID and
automatically removes the document ID from the concurrent hash map when
the reference count reaches zero.
Relates #18060