Currently, stored scripts use a namespace of (lang, id) to be put, get, deleted, and executed. This is not necessary since the lang is stored with the stored script. A user should only have to specify an id to use a stored script. This change makes that possible while keeping backwards compatibility with the previous namespace of (lang, id). Anywhere the previous namespace is used will log deprecation warnings.
The new behavior is the following:
When a user specifies a stored script, that script will be stored under both the new namespace and old namespace.
Take for example script 'A' with lang 'L0' and data 'D0'. If we add script 'A' to the empty set, the scripts map will be ["A" -- D0, "A#L0" -- D0]. If a script 'A' with lang 'L1' and data 'D1' is then added, the scripts map will be ["A" -- D1, "A#L1" -- D1, "A#L0" -- D0].
When a user deletes a stored script, that script will be deleted from both the new namespace (if it exists) and the old namespace.
Take for example a scripts map with {"A" -- D1, "A#L1" -- D1, "A#L0" -- D0}. If a script is removed specified by an id 'A' and lang null then the scripts map will be {"A#L0" -- D0}. To remove the final script, the deprecated namespace must be used, so an id 'A' and lang 'L0' would need to be specified.
When a user gets/executes a stored script, if the new namespace is used then the script will be retrieved/executed using only 'id', and if the old namespace is used then the script will be retrieved/executed using 'id' and 'lang'
This is related to #22116. URLRepository requires SocketPermission
connect. This commit introduces a new module called "repository-url"
where URLRepository will reside. With the new module, permissions can
be removed from core.
* Fix Translog.Delete serialization for sequence numbers
Translog.Delete used `.writeVLong` instead of `.writeLong` for the sequence
number and primary term (and their respective "read" variants). This could lead
to issues where a 5.x node sent a translog operation with a negative sequence
number (-2 for unassigned seq no) that tripped an assertion serializing a
negative number and causing ES to exit.
Adds a unit test for serialization and a mixed-cluster REST test, since that was
how this was originally caught.
* Use more realistic values for random seqNum and primary term
* Add comment with TODO for removal in 7.0
* Change comment into an assert
* Remove a checked exception, replacing it with `ParsingException`.
* Remove all Parser classes for the yaml sections, replacing them with static methods.
* Remove `ClientYamlTestFragmentParser`. Isn't used any more.
* Remove `ClientYamlTestSuiteParseContext`, replacing it with some static utility methods.
I did not rewrite the parsers using `ObjectParser` because I don't think it is worth it right now.
Sequence BWC logic consists of two elements:
1) Wire level BWC using stream versions.
2) A changed to the global checkpoint maintenance semantics.
For the sequence number infra to work with a mixed version clusters, we have to consider situation where the primary is on an old node and replicas are on new ones (i.e., the replicas will receive operations without seq#) and also the reverse (i.e., the primary sends operations to a replica but the replica can't process the seq# and respond with local checkpoint). An new primary with an old replica is a rare because we do not allow a replica to recover from a new primary. However, it can occur if the old primary failed and a new replica was promoted or during primary relocation where the source primary is treated as a replica until the master starts the target.
1) Old Primary & New Replica - this case is easy as is taken care of by the wire level BWC. All incoming requests will have their seq# set to `UNASSIGNED_SEQ_NO`, which doesn't confuse the local checkpoint logic (keeping it at `NO_OPS_PERFORMED`)
2) New Primary & Old replica - this one is trickier as the global checkpoint service currently takes all in sync replicas into consideration for the global checkpoint calculation. In order to deal with old replicas, we change the semantics to say all *new node* in sync replicas. That means the replicas on old nodes don't count for the global checkpointing. In this state the seq# infra is not fully operational (you can't search on it, because copies may miss it) but it is maintained on shards that can support it. The old replicas will have to go through a file based recovery at some point and will get the seq# information at that point. There is still an edge case where a new primary fails and an old replica takes over. I'lll discuss this one with @ywelsch as I prefer to avoid it completely.
This PR also re-enables the BWC tests which were disabled. As such it had to fix any BWC issue that had crept in. Most notably an issue with the removal of the `timestamp` field in #21670.
The commit also includes a fix for the default value of the seq number field in replicated write requests (it was 0 but should be -2), that surface some other minor bugs which are fixed as well.
Last - I added some debugging tools like more sane node names and forcing replication request to implement a `toString`
There is not yet a BWC layer in sequence numbers. This commit sets the
BWC version to 6.0.0 for the BWC and rolling upgrade tests until this
BWC layer is built.
This commit enables real BWC testing against a 5.1 snapshot. All
REST tests plus rolling upgrade test now run against a mixed version
cross major version cluster.
At one point in the past when moving out the rest tests from core to
their own subproject, we had multiple test classes which evenly split up
the tests to run. However, we simplified this and went back to a single
test runner to have better reproduceability in tests. This change
removes the remnants of that multiplexing support.
automatically between tasks, as we want some of the nodes from
the previous task to continue running in the next task. This
commit enables a cluster configuration setting to not stop
nodes automatically after a task runs, but instead the creator
of the test task must stop the running nodes explicitly in a
cleanup phase.
cluster, we wait for the cluster health to indicate the
necessary nodes have formed a cluster. This check was an
exact value (equality) check. However, if we are trying to
connect the nodes in the cluster to nodes from a previously
formed cluster (of the same name), then we will have more
nodes returned by the cluster health check than the current
task's configured number of nodes. Hence, this check needs
to be a >= check. This commit fixes it.
Ali Beyad
Jack Conradson
Tim Brooks
Lee Hinman
Igor Motov
Nik Everett
Boaz Leskes
jaymode
Jason Tedor
Simon Willnauer
Ryan Ernst