The example use of a scoring script was incorrectly using a filter
script query, which has no scoring, and thus no _score variable
avialable. This commit converts the example doc to using the newer
script_score query.
Adds the following parameters to `outlier_detection`:
- `compute_feature_influence` (boolean): whether to compute or not
feature influence scores
- `outlier_fraction` (double): the proportion of the data set assumed
to be outlying prior to running outlier detection
- `standardization_enabled` (boolean): whether to apply standardization
to the feature values
Backport of #47600
This commit adds support to retrieve all API keys if the authenticated
user is authorized to do so.
This removes the restriction of specifying one of the
parameters (like id, name, username and/or realm name)
when the `owner` is set to `false`.
Closes#46887
While function scores using scripts do allow explanations, they are only
creatable with an expert plugin. This commit improves the situation for
the newer script score query by adding the ability to set the
explanation from the script itself.
To set the explanation, a user would check for `explanation != null` to
indicate an explanation is needed, and then call
`explanation.set("some description")`.
The warning section above the example tells that index name has to end with the digits but the example itself uses index name without digits which is confusing.
* Add API to execute SLM retention on-demand (#47405)
This is a backport of #47405
This commit adds the `/_slm/_execute_retention` API endpoint. This
endpoint kicks off SLM retention and then returns immediately.
This in particular allows us to run retention without scheduling it
(for entirely manual invocation) or perform a one-off cleanup.
This commit also includes HLRC for the new API, and fixes an issue
in SLMSnapshotBlockingIntegTests where retention invoked prior to the
test completing could resurrect an index the internal test cluster
cleanup had already deleted.
Resolves#46508
Relates to #43663
* [DOCS] Adds examples to the PUT dfa and the evaluate dfa APIs.
* [DOCS] Removes extra lines from examples.
* Update docs/reference/ml/df-analytics/apis/evaluate-dfanalytics.asciidoc
Co-Authored-By: Lisa Cawley <lcawley@elastic.co>
* Update docs/reference/ml/df-analytics/apis/put-dfanalytics.asciidoc
Co-Authored-By: Lisa Cawley <lcawley@elastic.co>
* [DOCS] Explains examples.
We do mention that rolling back an upgrade requires a restore from a snapshot,
but it's hidden at the bottom of the "preparing to upgrade" instructions on a
different page from the actual upgrade instructions. This commit duplicates the
preparatory instructions onto the pages containing the actual upgrade
instructions and rewords the point about rollbacks a bit.
DATE_PART(<datetime unit>, <date/datetime>) is a function that allows
the user to extract the specified unit from a date/datetime field
similar to the EXTRACT (<datetime unit> FROM <date/datetime>) but
with different names and aliases for the units and it also provides more
options like `DATE_PART('tzoffset', datetimeField)`.
Implemented following the SQL server's spec: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/datepart-transact-sql?view=sql-server-2017
with the difference that the <datetime unit> argument is either a
literal single quoted string or gets a value from a table field, whereas
in SQL server keywords are used (unquoted identifiers) and it's not
possible to use a value coming for a table column.
Closes: #46372
(cherry picked from commit ead743d3579eb753fd314d4a58fae205e465d72e)
Ryan Ernst
Lisa Cawley
Dimitris Athanasiou
James Rodewig
Yogesh Gaikwad
Przemyslaw Gomulka
debadair
Mark Tozzi
István Zoltán Szabó
Francois-Clement Brossard
Paweł Krześniak
AndyHunt66
Russ Cam
Ioannis Kakavas
Lee Hinman
David Turner
Robin Clarke
Marios Trivyzas