In the example we show an `exists` query inside a constant score query. While this is possible, it can mislead users to think it is necessary so we should remove it.
# Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary,
# especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch.
#
# Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts
# the commit.
- moves calculation of the delay to a single place (ReplicaShardAllocator)
- reduces coupling between GatewayAllocator and RoutingService
- in master failover situations, elapsed delay time is forgotten
Closes#14808
At the time of geo_shape query conception, CONTAINS was not yet a supported spatial operation in Lucene. Since it is now available this commit adds ShapeRelation.CONTAINS to GeoShapeQuery. Randomized testing is included and documentation is updated.
We actually want to keep the test when using deprecated setting in 3.0.
We will keep this setting deprecated as well so people will be able to update in a smoother way.
Also add the deprecating information to the migration documentation.
Follow up for #13228.
This commit adds support for a secondary storage account:
```yml
cloud:
azure:
storage:
my_account1:
account: your_azure_storage_account1
key: your_azure_storage_key1
default: true
my_account2:
account: your_azure_storage_account2
key: your_azure_storage_key2
```
When creating a repository, you can choose which azure account you want to use for it:
```sh
curl -XPUT localhost:9200/_snapshot/my_backup1?pretty -d '{
"type": "azure"
}'
curl -XPUT localhost:9200/_snapshot/my_backup2?pretty -d '{
"type": "azure",
"settings": {
"account" : "my_account2",
"location_mode": "secondary_only"
}
}'
```
`location_mode` supports `primary_only` or `secondary_only`. Defaults to `primary_only`. Note that if you set it
to `secondary_only`, it will force `read_only` to true.
We already introduced the MatchNoneQueryBuilder query that does not
return any documents, mainly because we needed it for internal
representation of the NONE option in the IndicesQueryBuilder.
However, the query was requested at least once also for the query dsl,
and since we can parser it already we should document it as
`match_none` query in the relevant reference docs as well.