We currently use the djb2 hash function in order to compute the shard a
document should go to. Unfortunately this hash function is not very
sophisticated and you can sometimes hit adversarial cases, such as numeric ids
on 33 shards.
Murmur3 generates hashes with a better distribution, which should avoid the
adversarial cases.
Here are some examples of how 100000 incremental ids are distributed to shards
using either djb2 or murmur3.
5 shards:
Murmur3: [19933, 19964, 19940, 20030, 20133]
DJB: [20000, 20000, 20000, 20000, 20000]
3 shards:
Murmur3: [33185, 33347, 33468]
DJB: [30100, 30000, 39900]
33 shards:
Murmur3: [2999, 3096, 2930, 2986, 3070, 3093, 3023, 3052, 3112, 2940, 3036, 2985, 3031, 3048, 3127, 2961, 2901, 3105, 3041, 3130, 3013, 3035, 3031, 3019, 3008, 3022, 3111, 3086, 3016, 2996, 3075, 2945, 2977]
DJB: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 900, 900, 900, 900, 1000, 1000, 10000, 10000, 10000, 10000, 9100, 9100, 9100, 9100, 9000, 9000, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Even if djb2 looks ideal in some cases (5 shards), the fact that the
distribution of its hashes has some patterns can raise issues with some shard
counts (eg. 3, or even worse 33).
Some tests have been modified because they relied on implementation details of
the routing hash function.
Close#7954
delete/50_refresh tests per shard refresh using refresh:true in delete api. We might run into troubles though if we have a replica that gets initialized after a doc was indexed and deleted, without a refresh, as that doc won't be found when searching against that specific replica shard (as a refresh happens automatically before a replica gets exposed as started).
Adrien Grand
javanna
Clinton Gormley